You're your own typo Naxi. :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On 22 Sep 2006 09:01:01 -0500, Dave said:

gumming bureaucrats

While probably true, what I meant was gummint bureaucrats.

I met him. He talks to me. I refuse to say what he told me.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"katy" wrote in message
...
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article , Bart Senior .@. wrote:
Gore/Chavez '08
Cheney/Robertson '08 - we're not going to live forever anyway.

Dick Cheney will never run...his health is on the brink...he'd meltdown
before the world did....

So there is a god....


I keep telling you that...finally sunk in....

Capt. JG wrote:
I met him. He talks to me. I refuse to say what he told me.

As it should be...

Capt. JG wrote:
Yes, that's exactly what I want. It would, for one thing, reduce crime. It
would be far cheaper to invest in education and give people a handout than
put them in prison after they've victimized people.

I know this upsets you. I'm sorry.

But it doesn't work that way...look at Michigan...none of that
happened..crime went up (if you can't get out of the ghetto, you start
looking for things to amuse yourself...)

One can't help the corruption that results except to deal with it as it
comes.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
Yes, that's exactly what I want. It would, for one thing, reduce crime.
It would be far cheaper to invest in education and give people a handout
than put them in prison after they've victimized people.

I know this upsets you. I'm sorry.

But it doesn't work that way...look at Michigan...none of that
happened..crime went up (if you can't get out of the ghetto, you start
looking for things to amuse yourself...)

As opposed to the uncaring, all or nothing society? I pick the Great
Society. If it hadn't been for Vietnam, the GS would have had a chance.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:54:56 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

that's exactly what I want. It would, for one thing, reduce crime. It
would be far cheaper to invest in education and give people a handout than
put them in prison after they've victimized people.

Ah, yes. The Great Society all over again.

Amen to that sister...

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
I met him. He talks to me. I refuse to say what he told me.

As it should be...

Capt. JG wrote:
One can't help the corruption that results except to deal with it as it
comes.

And dealing with it costs money..because you have to deal with it, the
money you want earmarked for education goes to crime prevention
programs, beefed up cop shops, and court costs.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:59:10 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

If it hadn't been for Vietnam, the GS would have had a chance.

And if it hadn't been for the torching of our major cities.

??

And if it hadn't been for paying single teenage girls to stay home and
make
babies.

Who did that?

And if it hadn't been for the .....

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article t,
Maxprop wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
Joe wrote:

Gilligan wrote:
http://reuters.myway.com/article/200...A-SPAT-DC.html

Baby Hugo is a wacko.

Anyone who buys Citco gasoline is putting money in his pocket.
We have one down the street, Regular is 2.07 but right across the
street Exxon Mobil is 2.09.

They are always 2 - 3 cents cheaper so they can suck in the dumb ****s
to stupid to know any better.

We should be paying $5/gallon.

I find it amusing that you and the left wing are the first to condemn Bush
for his role with big oil, but turn around and advocate $5 per gallon
gasoline.

It should be in the form of a gas tax. Big oil has nothing to do with
it.

I'd much rather the additional cost of gasoline be in the form of profits to
big oil than in the form of additional federal gas taxes. The government
needs to learn to live within its means. Just dumping more revenue into
Washington won't solve anything. And the bottom line: the working poor
still won't be able to fill their vehicles with gasoline, regardless of
where the money goes.

You live in an area with relative affluence. Around here we have lots of
po' folk, and I watch them struggle with the price of fuel every time I go
to the pumps. Most of them own the only vehicles they can afford--big old,
poorly-running American cars with horrible fuel economy. I put gas in one
elderly woman's car one morning. She had put in $2 worth--all she
had--which was not even a gallon. She had to drive to a friend's funeral in
a nearby town and she was worried that she wouldn't make it, let alone get
home. So I put in $20 worth--it was the most that had been put in that old
junk heap in over a year, she said.

I recall John Kerry advocating much higher fuel prices during the campaign,
ostensibly in order to force people and automakers to gravitate to more
economical vehicles, and to encourage alternative energy schemes. Sounds
great on paper, but no one seems to care that a large segment of our
population will suffer under such artificially-high fuel prices.

Max