Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message reenews.ne t... "Capt. JG" wrote | Since there's no indication of a collision from the text, I'd agree. There's | nothing wrong or improper in changing course as long as you don't make the | situation worse. There's definitely something wrong with the Optimist changing course. According to the sailing rules it's required to hold to its course. Stand on vessel is assureadly allowed to alter course if it gives the burdened vessel more room. How can you say there's no incidation of a collision from the text? I said the Hobie Cat was heading straight for the bow of the Optimist. ''Heading straight for the bow'' does not necessarily mean a collision is immanent. Both sailboats turning is following the motor boat rule and sailboats are supposed to follow the sailing rules. Are you getting this out of the 'Sailing For Dummies' book? Keep reading! Scotty |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scotty" wrote | Stand on vessel is assureadly allowed to alter course if it | gives the burdened vessel more room. It's not allowed to alter course. The rule says it should hold its course and speed till the close quarters situation goes away. If boats go around willy-nilly altering course when they shouldn't they add confusion and cause accidents... | ''Heading straight for the bow'' does not necessarily mean a | collision is immanent. One boat was sailing 180 degrees and the other was sailing 360. When headed straight for the bow on these courses a collision is almost a sure thing. | Are you getting this out of the 'Sailing For Dummies' book? I'm getting it out of the colregs. Maybe you should read 'em too. Cheers, Ellen |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. It's not a sure thing. How about changes in current, depending on where
you are on the body of water. Current moves faster in some place than in others at the same time. Deep vs. shallow for example. Try again. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message reenews.net... "Scotty" wrote | Stand on vessel is assureadly allowed to alter course if it | gives the burdened vessel more room. It's not allowed to alter course. The rule says it should hold its course and speed till the close quarters situation goes away. If boats go around willy-nilly altering course when they shouldn't they add confusion and cause accidents... | ''Heading straight for the bow'' does not necessarily mean a | collision is immanent. One boat was sailing 180 degrees and the other was sailing 360. When headed straight for the bow on these courses a collision is almost a sure thing. | Are you getting this out of the 'Sailing For Dummies' book? I'm getting it out of the colregs. Maybe you should read 'em too. Cheers, Ellen |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ellen MacArthur" wrote in message reenews.ne t... "Scotty" wrote | Stand on vessel is assureadly allowed to alter course if it | gives the burdened vessel more room. It's not allowed to alter course. The rule says it should hold its course and speed till the close quarters situation goes away. If boats go around willy-nilly altering course when they shouldn't they add confusion and cause accidents... check again | ''Heading straight for the bow'' does not necessarily mean a | collision is immanent. One boat was sailing 180 degrees and the other was sailing 360. When headed straight for the bow on these courses a collision is almost a sure thing. ''almost''. Backing down are we? | Are you getting this out of the 'Sailing For Dummies' book? I'm getting it out of the colregs. Maybe you should read 'em too. Why? I'm not sailing. SBV |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My seamanship question #1 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #34 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #33 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #23 | ASA | |||
OT--9/11 Commission Suppressed the Evidence. | General |