Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
You go sailing (not racing) in an Optimist pram. You're going north. The east wind is right on your starboard beam. Up ahead you see a Hobie Cat 14 sailing fast flying a hull and he's headed right at your bow (he's going south). He changes course to the west and you change course to the east. Did you act the way the colregs tell you to? Cheers, Ellen |
#2
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
Ellen MacArthur wrote:
You go sailing (not racing) in an Optimist pram. You're going north. The east wind is right on your starboard beam. Up ahead you see a Hobie Cat 14 sailing fast flying a hull and he's headed right at your bow (he's going south). He changes course to the west and you change course to the east. Did you act the way the colregs tell you to? No. ColRegs clearly state that 180# men are not allowed in Optimist prams. DSK |
#3
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
"DSK" wrote | No. ColRegs clearly state that 180# men are not allowed in | Optimist prams. :-( OK, sorry. Change "you" to "a petite young woman of 105 pounds..." Cheers, Ellen |
#4
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
DSK wrote:
Ellen MacArthur wrote: You go sailing (not racing) in an Optimist pram. You're going north. The east wind is right on your starboard beam. Up ahead you see a Hobie Cat 14 sailing fast flying a hull and he's headed right at your bow (he's going south). He changes course to the west and you change course to the east. Did you act the way the colregs tell you to? No. ColRegs clearly state that 180# men are not allowed in Optimist prams. DSK Most people (under the age of 8) that would sail an Optimist pram wouldn't have the reading level to read ColRegs...they'd just be grateful that they didn't do a tippy.... |
#5
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
Ellen MacArthur wrote:
You go sailing (not racing) in an Optimist pram. You're going north. The east wind is right on your starboard beam. Up ahead you see a Hobie Cat 14 sailing fast flying a hull and he's headed right at your bow (he's going south). He changes course to the west and you change course to the east. Did you act the way the colregs tell you to? Cheers, Ellen The Colregs give no particular guidance on this. |
#6
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
"Jeff" wrote | The Colregs give no particular guidance on this. Wrong Jeff! There's definitely at least one rule covering it. Cheers, Ellen |
#7
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
Ellen MacArthur wrote:
"Jeff" wrote | The Colregs give no particular guidance on this. Wrong Jeff! There's definitely at least one rule covering it. Cheers, Ellen Don't kill innocent chilfren trying to learn how to sail? |
#8
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
Ellen MacArthur wrote:
"Jeff" wrote | The Colregs give no particular guidance on this. Wrong Jeff! There's definitely at least one rule covering it. Cheers, Ellen Well, of course they both acted to avoid the collision, but whether to turn left or right is not in the rules. The Opti was standon, but the way you told it the Hobie bore off so the Opti was free to do whatever. You could claim that the Opti should have held its course, but if that's what you were looking for you should have worded it differently. |
#9
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
"Jeff" wrote | You could claim that the Opti should have held its course, | but if that's what you were looking for you should have worded it | differently. I do claim the Optimist should have remained on course. The sailing rules require it to stay on course. That's what stand on means. It means to stay on the same course and speed. It was on starboard tack. My wording was as clear as I could make it. It was clear enough for any sensible person. You can nitpik anything if you've a mind to... Cheers, Ellen |
#10
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
My seamanship question #3
Ellen MacArthur wrote:
"Jeff" wrote | You could claim that the Opti should have held its course, | but if that's what you were looking for you should have worded it | differently. I do claim the Optimist should have remained on course. The sailing rules require it to stay on course. That's what stand on means. It means to stay on the same course and speed. It was on starboard tack. My wording was as clear as I could make it. It was clear enough for any sensible person. You can nitpik anything if you've a mind to... Cheers, Ellen Perhaps a bit of nitpicking, but if that's "as clear as you can make it" you don't have very good command of the language. If the boats were a certain distance apart, then the Opti is under no obligation to hold course. Also, if they are close and "in extremis" the the Opti must act to avoid collision. The rewording of the '72 rules also says the standon vessel can alter course earlier if it thinks the giveway vessel in not taking appropriate action. Thus, there's actually a relatively small window (if any!) where you could claim the opti *must* hold its course. Further, by saying the cat bore off and the opti headed up, you open the possibility that the cat bore off first. If I was in the opti I would probably head up the instant I sensed the cat was bearing off. Unless you can state the problem so that it clear you're talking about the standon obligation, you should pick a different scenario. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My seamanship question #1 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #34 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #33 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #23 | ASA | |||
OT--9/11 Commission Suppressed the Evidence. | General |