Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
Ellen MacArthur wrote: You are sailing your Sunfish. There's a lot of current where your sailing and the wind is pretty strong and blowing the same direction the currents going. You tack and get in irons. The wind pushes you backwards and the current pushes you backwards. Your sail flutters and your rudder doesn't work. Suddenly another Sunfish runs into the side of your boat. Who's at fault for the collision and why? Sorry, my rudder never "doesn't work." But I know it occasionally happens to others... an Sunfish are pretty easy to get in irons anyway, especially with the old rudder design (round tip profile). Jeff wrote: The current is irrelevant. All you have is boat A blew a tack and while it was in irons, boat B hit it. If A tacked too close, it could be A's fault. Otherwise, B gets most of the blame. Agreed, if they're not racing, then ColRegs says A is not under command and B should give way. If they are racing then it's A's fault under the IYRU rules which say that a boat which is tacking shall keep clear of a boat on a tack. I've always wondered about claiming NUC in these cases. Clearly, the letter of the law isn't followed if you don't show the appropriate signals. However, its been ruled that obvious signs like the outboard cover off are close enough. While the luffing sails could be considered a clear signal, being in irons is not an "exceptional circumstance" as required by the rule. OTOH, rule 2 certainly would cover this under "limitations of vessels." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My seamanship question #1 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #34 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #33 | ASA | |||
Seamanship Question #23 | ASA | |||
OT--9/11 Commission Suppressed the Evidence. | General |