Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It looks like the deal on my Seaward is dead. Two significant occurrences took place.
1. The small issue: The current owner informed me that he was keeping the anchor, docking lines, and bumpers because he needs them for his "next boat." It just seemed petty. I drove 8 hours to look at the boat, and felt that that would have been a good time to let me know which things I was inspecting weren't staying. More of a tell-tale, but no real big deal. However, when someone is handing you a check for your asking price of nearly $50K, is it then prudent to let the buyer know that you didn't mean to imply that the necessary hardware stays with the boat? 2. The big issue: the current owner wants me to pay off his loan on the boat and wait 2 weeks for the bank to clear the lien and produce the title. I'm not big on finance but it didn't feel right to be in limbo for 2 weeks. Can I sail the boat? Get it insured? Since I am essentially giving the current owner cash, I feel very vulnerable. I think he is an honest guy but too much can happen in two weeks, and I don't have the time or financial and legal expertise to make it work comfortably for me. I know it can be done, but the physical miles between us and the small details will surely become a burden. Major bummer. Back to the Google Board! ****! Scout |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scout, that's a drag. The Seaward was a boat I suggested to you, while Doug bashed it. I was wondering why you decided Doug's comments had no bearing on the purchase attempt. For what it's worth, I work with several surveyors, 2 are sailboat specialists (pretty much all they do) and all agree the Seaward is one of the better built small cruising boats. We've had a few come through here for work and they are damn solid. Sorry it's not working out, but I think if you talk things over a bit, you can save the deal. The owner keeping fenders and lines is not the end of the world. The other aspects of the deal can be worked out assuming you are certain his paperwork is real and not some sort of scam. Every now and again someone sells a boat that isn't theirs. RB 35s5 NY |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob,
Thanks for your advice. There are posters here I never see because they are in my ****-can file. Others I read all the time, like you and Doug. I laugh a lot and skim much of the trolling, but recognize that both you and Doug offer much to this group. So - what I concluded was that the Seaward is a superior boat, as you've stated, and I want one! However, upon close inspection, I also noted some of the things that Doug was referring to. For example, I noted that the supports for the shrouds, which are made of very heavy stainless hardware, pass through the cabin via a hole that appears to just be hacked through the fiberglass, and then caulked. As a water tight cabin, that doesn't cut it. And as a result of what appears to be an after-thought, the boat shows evidence of some major leaks in the cabin, which travelled around, as water leaks do. I also noted that the Captain's seat across the stern is an arch-shaped piece of reinforced fiberglass, and it has been broken in two places. The current owner is much lighter than I, so in the back of my mind I was fabricating a new, hinged seat. I can deal with these issues, but my point is that both you and Doug are making truthful and accurate statements and I took both sets of advice to the inspection with me. It was very helpful and I thank you both! I'm also considering a new boat, although when I contacted Seaward to ask for warranty information on the 2004, their agent wrote back to me "don't take offense, but you didn't buy the Seaward from us, and we don't have gobs of time to bring you up to speed on it. - if you have questions, the seller will have to answer them." That's some factory support, huh? That one statement made me feel like I wouldn't rush to give them new business - it's the kind of off-handed remark that just may have cost them a $90K sale. For that kind of cash, Precision will build me a 28 model. Back to the used boat: even though we're talking a fair sum of cash, the current owner and I kept it rather informal and on a gentleman's level. However, I realized as we came closer to making the transaction, that all protection was in the current owner's favor. His bank (loan) is taking care of their asses but I have no one but myself to cover me. Hand me a title and I'll hand over the cash is what I had in mind. I feel as though I'd need to hire an advisor to make this work now. The lines and fenders are more of an indicator to me than a real problem. Hell, I threw in life preservers, spare parts, grills, and every other nicety I could in order to sweeten the deal when I sold. This didn't kill the deal by itself, but it gave me a reference point regarding the owner's mindset. I know there are plenty of nice boats out there for a guy with cash and a desire to sail, so I'm walking away unless the current owner calls and fixes things. If it were me, I'd get a bridge loan, and with title in hand, I'd make a deal. Thanks again Rob Scout Capt. Rob wrote: Scout, that's a drag. The Seaward was a boat I suggested to you, while Doug bashed it. I was wondering why you decided Doug's comments had no bearing on the purchase attempt. For what it's worth, I work with several surveyors, 2 are sailboat specialists (pretty much all they do) and all agree the Seaward is one of the better built small cruising boats. We've had a few come through here for work and they are damn solid. Sorry it's not working out, but I think if you talk things over a bit, you can save the deal. The owner keeping fenders and lines is not the end of the world. The other aspects of the deal can be worked out assuming you are certain his paperwork is real and not some sort of scam. Every now and again someone sells a boat that isn't theirs. RB 35s5 NY |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry to hear this isn't going smoothly ...
A few thoughts: Don't worry about the anchors, if you're like me you have your own thoughts and would likely replace them. Fenders also you might be replaced, I wouldn't be happy rubbing someone else grunge into my boat - OTOH it seems rather petty, kind of like a renter taking everything that isn't nailed down when leaving. Last time around, I kept all my portable nav instruments, tools, and cooking utensils. All sailing gear, including things that I had to replace like a riding sail, were left behind. I'm surprised at how often manufacturers fail to realize that they are being judged for future business when they blow off inquiries. We went to the Newport show in '94 to pick our next boat. A Nonsuch 36 was on the short list and Nonsuch was there with the team that had taken over from Hinterhoeller. I asked them (VP of Sales, I think) if there was anyway to upgrade the double line reefing on my N30 to the new single line system, and they blew me off with a curt "Yea, buy a new boat." My thought was "**** you too, there's no chance I'll buy a boat from you," and it was no surprise that no one else bought from them and the company was gone in a few years. As for the current deal, its the seller's responsibility to deliver a boat free of liens. You should not have to put down serious money until you can legitimately insure the boat. When we bought the PDQ there was an anxious moment after we had handed over the big check, because the 800 number for Boat/US would not work with the Canadian phone system! Of course, this was sorted out in an hour and seemed like it was a meaningless worry, but an odd thing happened later: After paying for the boat we played with it for a few days and then left it in Canada. When we came back in a few weeks we were told not to be concerned as we walked down the dock because our boat had not been damaged by the explosion! Indeed, a powerboat 3 slips over had blown up after returning from the fuel dock and plugging in to the shore power. Our boat was unaffected, but the cat owned by the owner of PDQ did suffer cosmetic damage. Had things gone a bit differently, we could have been in that slip, uninsured. This deal can probably be salvaged - it sounds like a communication problem between the seller and the seller's bank. They deal with house closings every day, this shouldn't be any more complicated. Scout wrote: Rob, Thanks for your advice. There are posters here I never see because they are in my ****-can file. Others I read all the time, like you and Doug. I laugh a lot and skim much of the trolling, but recognize that both you and Doug offer much to this group. So - what I concluded was that the Seaward is a superior boat, as you've stated, and I want one! However, upon close inspection, I also noted some of the things that Doug was referring to. For example, I noted that the supports for the shrouds, which are made of very heavy stainless hardware, pass through the cabin via a hole that appears to just be hacked through the fiberglass, and then caulked. As a water tight cabin, that doesn't cut it. And as a result of what appears to be an after-thought, the boat shows evidence of some major leaks in the cabin, which travelled around, as water leaks do. I also noted that the Captain's seat across the stern is an arch-shaped piece of reinforced fiberglass, and it has been broken in two places. The current owner is much lighter than I, so in the back of my mind I was fabricating a new, hinged seat. I can deal with these issues, but my point is that both you and Doug are making truthful and accurate statements and I took both sets of advice to the inspection with me. It was very helpful and I thank you both! I'm also considering a new boat, although when I contacted Seaward to ask for warranty information on the 2004, their agent wrote back to me "don't take offense, but you didn't buy the Seaward from us, and we don't have gobs of time to bring you up to speed on it. - if you have questions, the seller will have to answer them." That's some factory support, huh? That one statement made me feel like I wouldn't rush to give them new business - it's the kind of off-handed remark that just may have cost them a $90K sale. For that kind of cash, Precision will build me a 28 model. Back to the used boat: even though we're talking a fair sum of cash, the current owner and I kept it rather informal and on a gentleman's level. However, I realized as we came closer to making the transaction, that all protection was in the current owner's favor. His bank (loan) is taking care of their asses but I have no one but myself to cover me. Hand me a title and I'll hand over the cash is what I had in mind. I feel as though I'd need to hire an advisor to make this work now. The lines and fenders are more of an indicator to me than a real problem. Hell, I threw in life preservers, spare parts, grills, and every other nicety I could in order to sweeten the deal when I sold. This didn't kill the deal by itself, but it gave me a reference point regarding the owner's mindset. I know there are plenty of nice boats out there for a guy with cash and a desire to sail, so I'm walking away unless the current owner calls and fixes things. If it were me, I'd get a bridge loan, and with title in hand, I'd make a deal. Thanks again Rob Scout Capt. Rob wrote: Scout, that's a drag. The Seaward was a boat I suggested to you, while Doug bashed it. I was wondering why you decided Doug's comments had no bearing on the purchase attempt. For what it's worth, I work with several surveyors, 2 are sailboat specialists (pretty much all they do) and all agree the Seaward is one of the better built small cruising boats. We've had a few come through here for work and they are damn solid. Sorry it's not working out, but I think if you talk things over a bit, you can save the deal. The owner keeping fenders and lines is not the end of the world. The other aspects of the deal can be worked out assuming you are certain his paperwork is real and not some sort of scam. Every now and again someone sells a boat that isn't theirs. RB 35s5 NY |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Jeff,
You've captured my thoughts exactly. The seller is a heck of nice guy but somehow doesn't understand how I would turn down his proposal. Part of it was communication - I suppose he assumed I'd be alright with paying for a boat that he doesn't really own. The bank takes the position that no one is to be trusted (except them). The lesson, I guess, is to state up front what is expected from the other party. I may still get that boat, Hake has contacted me afterall, and this 26RK looks even better. And, it has their stamp of approval as well as some new upgrades. Scout Jeff wrote: Sorry to hear this isn't going smoothly ... A few thoughts: Don't worry about the anchors, if you're like me you have your own thoughts and would likely replace them. Fenders also you might be replaced, I wouldn't be happy rubbing someone else grunge into my boat - OTOH it seems rather petty, kind of like a renter taking everything that isn't nailed down when leaving. Last time around, I kept all my portable nav instruments, tools, and cooking utensils. All sailing gear, including things that I had to replace like a riding sail, were left behind. I'm surprised at how often manufacturers fail to realize that they are being judged for future business when they blow off inquiries. We went to the Newport show in '94 to pick our next boat. A Nonsuch 36 was on the short list and Nonsuch was there with the team that had taken over from Hinterhoeller. I asked them (VP of Sales, I think) if there was anyway to upgrade the double line reefing on my N30 to the new single line system, and they blew me off with a curt "Yea, buy a new boat." My thought was "**** you too, there's no chance I'll buy a boat from you," and it was no surprise that no one else bought from them and the company was gone in a few years. As for the current deal, its the seller's responsibility to deliver a boat free of liens. You should not have to put down serious money until you can legitimately insure the boat. When we bought the PDQ there was an anxious moment after we had handed over the big check, because the 800 number for Boat/US would not work with the Canadian phone system! Of course, this was sorted out in an hour and seemed like it was a meaningless worry, but an odd thing happened later: After paying for the boat we played with it for a few days and then left it in Canada. When we came back in a few weeks we were told not to be concerned as we walked down the dock because our boat had not been damaged by the explosion! Indeed, a powerboat 3 slips over had blown up after returning from the fuel dock and plugging in to the shore power. Our boat was unaffected, but the cat owned by the owner of PDQ did suffer cosmetic damage. Had things gone a bit differently, we could have been in that slip, uninsured. This deal can probably be salvaged - it sounds like a communication problem between the seller and the seller's bank. They deal with house closings every day, this shouldn't be any more complicated. Scout wrote: Rob, Thanks for your advice. There are posters here I never see because they are in my ****-can file. Others I read all the time, like you and Doug. I laugh a lot and skim much of the trolling, but recognize that both you and Doug offer much to this group. So - what I concluded was that the Seaward is a superior boat, as you've stated, and I want one! However, upon close inspection, I also noted some of the things that Doug was referring to. For example, I noted that the supports for the shrouds, which are made of very heavy stainless hardware, pass through the cabin via a hole that appears to just be hacked through the fiberglass, and then caulked. As a water tight cabin, that doesn't cut it. And as a result of what appears to be an after-thought, the boat shows evidence of some major leaks in the cabin, which travelled around, as water leaks do. I also noted that the Captain's seat across the stern is an arch-shaped piece of reinforced fiberglass, and it has been broken in two places. The current owner is much lighter than I, so in the back of my mind I was fabricating a new, hinged seat. I can deal with these issues, but my point is that both you and Doug are making truthful and accurate statements and I took both sets of advice to the inspection with me. It was very helpful and I thank you both! I'm also considering a new boat, although when I contacted Seaward to ask for warranty information on the 2004, their agent wrote back to me "don't take offense, but you didn't buy the Seaward from us, and we don't have gobs of time to bring you up to speed on it. - if you have questions, the seller will have to answer them." That's some factory support, huh? That one statement made me feel like I wouldn't rush to give them new business - it's the kind of off-handed remark that just may have cost them a $90K sale. For that kind of cash, Precision will build me a 28 model. Back to the used boat: even though we're talking a fair sum of cash, the current owner and I kept it rather informal and on a gentleman's level. However, I realized as we came closer to making the transaction, that all protection was in the current owner's favor. His bank (loan) is taking care of their asses but I have no one but myself to cover me. Hand me a title and I'll hand over the cash is what I had in mind. I feel as though I'd need to hire an advisor to make this work now. The lines and fenders are more of an indicator to me than a real problem. Hell, I threw in life preservers, spare parts, grills, and every other nicety I could in order to sweeten the deal when I sold. This didn't kill the deal by itself, but it gave me a reference point regarding the owner's mindset. I know there are plenty of nice boats out there for a guy with cash and a desire to sail, so I'm walking away unless the current owner calls and fixes things. If it were me, I'd get a bridge loan, and with title in hand, I'd make a deal. Thanks again Rob Scout Capt. Rob wrote: Scout, that's a drag. The Seaward was a boat I suggested to you, while Doug bashed it. I was wondering why you decided Doug's comments had no bearing on the purchase attempt. For what it's worth, I work with several surveyors, 2 are sailboat specialists (pretty much all they do) and all agree the Seaward is one of the better built small cruising boats. We've had a few come through here for work and they are damn solid. Sorry it's not working out, but I think if you talk things over a bit, you can save the deal. The owner keeping fenders and lines is not the end of the world. The other aspects of the deal can be worked out assuming you are certain his paperwork is real and not some sort of scam. Every now and again someone sells a boat that isn't theirs. RB 35s5 NY |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scout, any conman worth his salt knows how to create that impression.
"Scout" wrote in message oups.com... Thanks Jeff, You've captured my thoughts exactly. The seller is a heck of nice guy but somehow doesn't understand how I would turn down his proposal. |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com.. .. Scout, that's a drag. The Seaward was a boat I suggested to you, while Doug bashed it. I was wondering why you decided Doug's comments had no bearing on the purchase attempt. That's real classy Bob, Scouts' heart is broken and you use this to take a jab at Doug. |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damn! That sucks.
Were those items listed in his advertisement? All the articles on selling/buying a boat advise to make crystal clear what goes and what stays. Mmmm, I bet a broker could tell you about the bank issue. Too bad there isn't a real one here. Scotty "Scout" wrote in message ... It looks like the deal on my Seaward is dead. Two significant occurrences took place. 1. The small issue: The current owner informed me that he was keeping the anchor, docking lines, and bumpers because he needs them for his "next boat." It just seemed petty. I drove 8 hours to look at the boat, and felt that that would have been a good time to let me know which things I was inspecting weren't staying. More of a tell-tale, but no real big deal. However, when someone is handing you a check for your asking price of nearly $50K, is it then prudent to let the buyer know that you didn't mean to imply that the necessary hardware stays with the boat? 2. The big issue: the current owner wants me to pay off his loan on the boat and wait 2 weeks for the bank to clear the lien and produce the title. I'm not big on finance but it didn't feel right to be in limbo for 2 weeks. Can I sail the boat? Get it insured? Since I am essentially giving the current owner cash, I feel very vulnerable. I think he is an honest guy but too much can happen in two weeks, and I don't have the time or financial and legal expertise to make it work comfortably for me. I know it can be done, but the physical miles between us and the small details will surely become a burden. Major bummer. Back to the Google Board! ****! Scout |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 06:32:01 -0400, "Scout"
wrote: It looks like the deal on my Seaward is dead. Two significant occurrences took place. 1. The small issue: The current owner informed me that he was keeping the anchor, docking lines, and bumpers because he needs them for his "next boat." It just seemed petty. I drove 8 hours to look at the boat, and felt that that would have been a good time to let me know which things I was inspecting weren't staying. More of a tell-tale, but no real big deal. However, when someone is handing you a check for your asking price of nearly $50K, is it then prudent to let the buyer know that you didn't mean to imply that the necessary hardware stays with the boat? 2. The big issue: the current owner wants me to pay off his loan on the boat and wait 2 weeks for the bank to clear the lien and produce the title. I'm not big on finance but it didn't feel right to be in limbo for 2 weeks. Can I sail the boat? Get it insured? Since I am essentially giving the current owner cash, I feel very vulnerable. I think he is an honest guy but too much can happen in two weeks, and I don't have the time or financial and legal expertise to make it work comfortably for me. I know it can be done, but the physical miles between us and the small details will surely become a burden. Major bummer. Back to the Google Board! ****! Scout Too bad Scout. The '04 located in the panhandle is still listed on the Seaward brokerage site. A far piece away from you, but available. Read in post below where you were not knocked out by their customer service. Tell you the truth, I emailed them asking for some clarification of displacement info on the engine options, and they never returned my email. But I made their database because they now email me every time a boat comes in brokerage. At any rate if it is still there in October, I will possibly drop by and look at it as I'm going to be in the area. As mentioned, don't think it is right for me, but if you still have interest, will give you my impression if you haven't moved on. The listed boat may be the one I saw in St. Joe's Bay last spring. Looked great under sail. Frank |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() That's real classy Bob, Scouts' heart is broken and you use this to take a jab at Doug. Scotty, take a pill. I wanted to hear what Scout had found and he honestly told us. Please don't turn every thread into a troll. Scout, if you really like the boat, don't give up. I will add this though: The response you got from Seaward is so awful and dumb, I'd send it back to them and let them know you'd NEVER buy a new boat from them. They should offer SOME support for thier boats no matter who the owner is. When I bought the Beneteau they were very helpful in giving me specs, part info and some history on my exact hull #. Good luck...I hope it works out. RB 35s5 NY |