![]() |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
"Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... Guess I misjudged you in my other post, CWM. You're still an absurd jerk. All it takes is a few tugs on his strings, and Doug has him dancing again. Scotty |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
"Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... I'd have to suspect that you probably are a much nicer person vis-a-vis than you appear to be by your posts. people like BB and Bob are real nice to people face to face , only because they fear them. SBV |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
Capt. Rob wrote: As a broker LOL............................................... ......... 35s5 PHRF doggie |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
You are correct that I do not know Doug personally.
In other words, you make your assertions about my knowledge, skills, activities, in complete ignorance of them. Charlie Morgan wrote: No. I make a fair ansd reasonable judgement about you based on your participation here. Really? Let's take a look at that premise. I assert that I sail(ed) a Lightning. There are pictures of me sailing a Lightning and my name on various Lightning class & regatta websites which are not under my control. You conclude I lied about owning/sailing/racing Lightning? Not only that but a purple one (why would anybody lie about that)? I assert that my wife & I have owned & sailed & cruised a Hunter 19. Pictures etc etc. I assert that I am building a carbon fiber dinghy. Perhaps an overly ambitious project but heck it's my money. Why would anybody lie about such a thing, aside from the pictures I've shown of the boat in various stages of progress? I assert that I owned & sailed & raced a Johnson 18. Not only have I shown pics of myself & my wife sailing it, but once again my name is on various other websites. You got my phone # and old address from the Johnson 18 class website, so if I lied about that it makes you look pretty stupid. So, let's go back and ask again, why do you think I make untrue statements? Looks like a pretty good & verifiable record so far. Actually, you'd be uneasy if you realized how much I know about you. Yeah, you keep saying that, but you are totally clueless, as has been demonstrated countless times. You don't even know my first name. Go ahead. Tell us! Give me a shred of evidence that you know anything about me personally. Why would I do that? It would give away an advantage to no purpose. Unlike you I have little reason to bluster & brag on the internet. .... You spent months convinced I was Bobsprit posting under another name I'm still not convinced ... because your overblown ego couldn;t accept that more than one person thought you were a blowhard jerk. Not really, it's more because the odds are very small that 2 persons with the exact same socio-pathology and the same vocabulary would show up in this tiny corner of cyberspace. It also strikes me as very unlikely that another person would be so determined to take revenge for slights against Bobsprit. It also strikes me as unlikely that a another person would include me as a target of revenge when I have not done anything to Bobsprit, such as posting his address or insulting his wife; yet this is the "reason" you gave for posting what you thought was my address and cyber-stalking my wife. OTOH Bobsprit has long been as spiteful & hate-filled toward me as his tiny putrid self can be. ... Being able to read and understand headers might have saved you a lot of embarrassment. Being able to hop proxies more adroitly might save you a date in court, or worse. Did you get fired for your little stalking escapade or just chewed out? See, I admit I don't know... I also don't care. DSK |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... In Ocotner you can come down to New Bern and introduce yourself. As simple as that. There goes the neighborhood. Max What's one more nematode? |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
"Scotty" wrote in message . .. "Charlie Morgan" wrote in message ... On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 19:39:44 -0400, katy wrote: Someone else on usenet "confirming" anything about you does not mean anything. Maxprop is not real. He's just another character on usenet. He used to post under his real name, but that was a long time ago. Now he plays a character named maxprop. I'm at least as real as he is. I'm also a lot nicer in person. I absolutely guarantee it! In other words, you have no life outside of this NG. that's so pathetic. SBV Actually, outside of this newsgroup CWM is a real gentleman with a great sense of wit. I've met him twice. |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
What kind of a friend would I be if I did not come to their support? An interesting one with a sense of humor. RB 35s5 NY |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message ... On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:19:16 -0600, "Gilligan" wrote: "Charlie Morgan" wrote in message . .. Doug is a know nothing, non-sailing, Bag of Farts and now Gilly is a know nothing, non-sailing bag of farts. That is one of the greatest compliments a person could be served. Thank you kindly for classifying me in the same sailing category as Doug King. While I believe he is leagues beyond my experience and ability, your consideration of me as his peer is warmly appreciated. Thank you, Gilligan Just further evidence that you are a know-nothing non-sailing bag of farts. Don't let it get you down. Doug doesn't. He enjoys obliviously wallowing in muck. CWM Right you are there Chuck. I don't own a boat, I've never sailed. Everything I say is made up. And yet you emotionally respond to everything I say. Keep swinging at air. |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
Gilligan wrote:
Actually, outside of this newsgroup CWM is a real gentleman Does that mean he wears a sword? ... with a great sense of wit. I've met him twice. Perhaps you could introduce us, then. I'd also like to meet Lloyd Bonafide and shake his hand some day. DSK |
No Test Sail for Doug, the King of Keels!
In article ,
DSK wrote: Capt. JG wrote: Every boat is different. Sailing a "sister ship" only gives one a fuzzy picture of what another boat is like. Fine for general impressions, but not worth much instead of a sea trial. Agreed, but then it's also true that you can learn a lot about how a boat sails... specifically, what techniques it rewards and which ones it doesn't... sailing a sistership. Also agreed. It's a great way to get a good (or bad) impression of a particular boat. I sailed dozens of different boats for five years (or something like that) before getting serious about buying the Sabre. The vast majority of production boats are far from one-design, details of hull construction (if not actual hull shape) and rig vary tremendously over a production run. Still, the basic proportions of hull, foils, rig, etc are so close that the boats will behave pretty much the same. Then again, to jump on a sisership with different sails & different tuning might give you the impression that it's a completely different boat. As for the specifics of a given boat's gear, deck layout, wiring, etc etc... you're right on, a sistership is useless as a teaching platform. Yep. For general impressions and such, they're fine, but for a purchase, no way. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com