I'm wearing out the frickin letters on my delete button on this thread!

B-O-O-O-R-R-R-R-R-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-I-N-N-N-N-N-N-G-G-G-G-G!!!!



"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...

So I need to do what everyone else does?

No, I'm just applying your criteria.


Actually, you're not.


It's not. I want to have even more choice in excellent cars.

Looks like the Koreans mean business.


You mean GM, Ford or Chrysler. Remember Toyota is American made.

It is made IN America IN PART, but it's not an American car.



Nope. Seeping wounds do a number on leather, as does screwdrivers.


Seeping wounds are more likely in a Sienna with it's inferior safety
ratings and performance. As for Screwdrivers...none of us are drinkers.


We'll see what is preferred three years down the road - in resale value.


Three years down the road the cars we're discussed will be "old" and
the Toyota out of warranty. The Kia will have 2 years left bumper to
bumper and 10 on the powertrain!


It takes a bigger hit.

No one has noted a difference. We did get slightly better MPG in
premium, but power was still excellent on regular.

So? Is it better?

Yup, Suzanne said the Sienna felt underpowered and taxed when she got
on the throttle. I agreed. It needs more torque.

Sienna costs less!

Please show everyone where a Sienna, loaded to the same level as a
loaded Sedona EX costs LESS.


Don't forget the 25% tariff slapped on Toyota minivans at the time.

Toyota still coppied. They all did and still do. Kia's just doing it
very very well.


No you can't. I am in a weakened state.

Puh-lease. It's pretty hard for you to bash a van with rave reviews and
no service history and a 10 year warranty! You've done a terrible job,
tired or not.


RB
35s5
NY