"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
I'm not going to try and defend China's human rights record. That's got
nothing to do with air pollution. No one is interested in living in
polluted environment, and the Chinese, including the leaders, are not
stupid. They know that the long term consequences are bad, and if nothing
else, the Chinese are into long term.

If you're going to play semantic games, such as lack of vs. minimize, then
there's not much point in going any further with the discussion. It's
stupid and doesn't contribute anything substantive.

Okay.

Max

I take that back. :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
I'm not going to try and defend China's human rights record. That's got
nothing to do with air pollution. No one is interested in living in
polluted environment, and the Chinese, including the leaders, are not
stupid. They know that the long term consequences are bad, and if nothing
else, the Chinese are into long term.

If you're going to play semantic games, such as lack of vs. minimize,
then there's not much point in going any further with the discussion.
It's stupid and doesn't contribute anything substantive.

Okay.

Max