Now you're talking Bob.

Bout time someone started talking quality in modern cameras.
Not second quality fluff. That Hasselblad is sweet, I might order one
tonight.

I bet Bobspit could learn allot about cameras by looking at the
application gallery on the web-site.

Joe

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
Now you're talking Bob.

Bout time someone started talking quality in modern cameras.
Not second quality fluff. That Hasselblad is sweet, I might order one
tonight.

I bet Bobspit could learn allot about cameras by looking at the
application gallery on the web-site.

Joe


Right you are Joe. That is one fine camera, way beyond the means of RB in
both expense and functionality. I think you should get one and you could
make it a business expense.

In a world of compromise, some men dont - Hasselblad!

I bet Oz owns a Hasselblad!

Glory!

Used, without lens costs more than Robbie's whole system:

http://cgi.ebay.com/GORGEOUS-HASSELB...cmd ZViewItem


Aaahahahahahahaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As I said, you have no idea where these cameras are used or for what.
They are not found in studios. In fact I know of two in use right now
by the Museum of Natural History, but not in any capacity you can
fathom.
Still awaiting your comments. So far you've posted nothing but hot air.


RB
35s5
NY

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...
As I said, you have no idea where these cameras are used or for what.
They are not found in studios. In fact I know of two in use right now
by the Museum of Natural History, but not in any capacity you can
fathom.
Still awaiting your comments. So far you've posted nothing but hot air.


RB
35s5
NY


Almost every picture taken in space was taken by a Hasselblad. They've been
on every shuttle flight, at least 5 cameras each!.

The first footprint on the moon - photographed by Hasselblad!

Hasselblad is also big into aerial photography.

They're used in military and aerospace regularly. In fact, I picked up a
used Hasselblad aerial recon camera and housing down on Canal St in NYC. I
bought it by the pound and resold it for much, much more!!!

aaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaa!!!!!

Hasselblad - a real camera!

Not junk!!

I bet Joe is buying one right now!

I hope he gets that 22 megapixel model and all the lenses!

Glory!

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
. ..

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...
As I said, you have no idea where these cameras are used or for what.
They are not found in studios. In fact I know of two in use right now
by the Museum of Natural History, but not in any capacity you can
fathom.
Still awaiting your comments. So far you've posted nothing but hot air.


RB
35s5
NY


Almost every picture taken in space was taken by a Hasselblad. They've
been on every shuttle flight, at least 5 cameras each!.

They've been on every NASA spaceflight since the first orbital Mercury
missions. Hasselblad was the only company interested in adapting their
bodies and lenses to NASA's needs at the time. After seeing how much "free
publicity" Hasselblad got, every camera company showed interest. But NASA
had what they wanted and stuck with the 'Blads.

Max

Nikon is now NASA's #1 flight camera.

http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/news...f5eva_e_00.htm

Poor Bob C. is stomped again. Then again you have to wonder what Bob
might use a 22MP or higher for? Does he know that a 4MP D2Hs makes the
same quality 8X10 prints and has even better control over dynamic
range?

Bye, bye, Bobby!


RB
35s5
NY

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...
Nikon is now NASA's #1 flight camera.

http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/news...f5eva_e_00.htm

Poor Bob C. is stomped again. Then again you have to wonder what Bob
might use a 22MP or higher for? Does he know that a 4MP D2Hs makes the
same quality 8X10 prints and has even better control over dynamic
range?

Bye, bye, Bobby!

Who cares about 8x10 prints? What about running the pixels into a DSP for
analysis. What kinds of analysis? Like looking for slight ground collapses
due to tunnel, a surface wake in mm from a submarine running hundreds of
meters below the surface, changes in water reflectance due to oil films,
subtle changes in wave structure due to winds, old river beds under the
sand, buried objects in the sand, land mines, etc.

Go play with your toy camera and your 8 x 10's. Science has much better and
more sophisticated uses for photography. Since you know so much about
cameras, how many lines of C code does it take to write a recursive low pass
filter using a bilinear transformation to discern the chromolesence and
luminesence characteristics of a black and white 16 MP digital photograph?
Tell us Robbie! Tell us!!!!

Bwaaahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Scorched like a flounder in lava!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Amen!

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...
Nikon is now NASA's #1 flight camera.

And Huffy is the OFFICIAL bike of the US Olympic Cycling Team!

Bwaahahahahahahahaaa!!!!!!!!!!

Capt. Rob wrote:

Poor Bob C. is stomped again. Then again you have to wonder what Bob
might use a 22MP or higher for? Does he know that a 4MP D2Hs makes the
same quality 8X10 prints and has even better control over dynamic
range?

Yeah, NASA take pics in space so they can print out a few 10x8s for their
grannies. What a prune!


Bye, bye, Bobby!

Bye, bye!


--
Capt Scumbalino