Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Strength of Steel Vs Carbon
Geostationary... I think that's right.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "DSK" wrote in message ... We're talking space elevator! "Joe" wrote How long will the cable need to be Jon to lift and anchor a 2000 lb payload? And how strong? Capt. JG wrote: I believe the space end needs to be in geosynchronous orbit. Geosynchronous or geostationary? That's a very high orbit, about 22,000 miles up. IIRC The Space Shuttle can only reach that altitude with about 1/4 payload, it's more efficient to build rockets to launch geosynchronous satellites. Anyway, the weight doesn't go away just because it's tied to a rock in outer space. The space elevator still needs power to lift... a common misconception that it doesn't. But it could be much more efficient than a rocket or shuttle. DSK |
#2
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Strength of Steel Vs Carbon
"Capt. JG" wrote:
Geostationary... I think that's right. All geostationary satelites are geosynchronous, but not all geosynchronous satelites are geostationary! Cheers Marty |
#3
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Strength of Steel Vs Carbon
Ok, well, we've now exceeded my understanding of the space ladder. :-)
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... "Capt. JG" wrote: Geostationary... I think that's right. All geostationary satelites are geosynchronous, but not all geosynchronous satelites are geostationary! Cheers Marty |
#4
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Strength of Steel Vs Carbon
"Martin Baxter" wrote All geostationary satelites are geosynchronous, but not all geosynchronous satelites are geostationary! that goes without saying. SBV |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Origami steel boat building | Boat Building | |||
Ping:... Joe | ASA | |||
Pontoon boats. Aluminum tube? or Steel? | Boat Building | |||
The ANTARCTIC | ASA | |||
Fiberglass loss of strength | Cruising |