Max, instead of trying unsuccessfully to insult me, try typing in "evidence
for global warming" and see what you get. Here's one of 18 million links.
Good night and good luck...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGE1BECPI1.DTL

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
It is not a personal attack. Please show me where I attacked him in the
sentence. I think you're ascribing negative connotations to it. I could
have easily been referring to his cranium size.

The preponderance of evidence suggests and most reputable scientists
agree that human beings are the primary cause of global warming. Even
Bush said it.

All we're asking you to do is provide some references to that
"preponderance of evidence."

I tend to think you are inclined to accept whatever position happens to
agree with your personal brand of political dogma, without reviewing the
evidence for and against. In other words, don't confuse you with the
facts, your mind is made up.

Max

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Max, instead of trying unsuccessfully to insult me, try typing in
"evidence for global warming" and see what you get. Here's one of 18
million links. Good night and good luck...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGE1BECPI1.DTL

What evidence are you referring to? I see only a report based on talks
given at a meeting of the AAAS. I'd love to see the actual papers upon
which those talks were based, not just some reporter's interpretation of
what he heard. You still haven't provided any references or evidence.

Max

Nor is it my job to do so. You're a smart guy... look it up yourself. I even
gave you the google string.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Max, instead of trying unsuccessfully to insult me, try typing in
"evidence for global warming" and see what you get. Here's one of 18
million links. Good night and good luck...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGE1BECPI1.DTL

What evidence are you referring to? I see only a report based on talks
given at a meeting of the AAAS. I'd love to see the actual papers upon
which those talks were based, not just some reporter's interpretation of
what he heard. You still haven't provided any references or evidence.

Max

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Max, instead of trying unsuccessfully to insult me, try typing in
"evidence for global warming" and see what you get. Here's one of 18
million links. Good night and good luck...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...NGE1BECPI1.DTL

What evidence are you referring to? I see only a report based on talks
given at a meeting of the AAAS. I'd love to see the actual papers upon
which those talks were based, not just some reporter's interpretation of
what he heard. You still haven't provided any references or evidence.

Nor is it my job to do so. You're a smart guy... look it up yourself. I
even gave you the google string.

It wasn't my job, or that of Lloyd, to provide references for you, either.
But we both did so.

Why? Because we actually have scientific data to support our side of the
argument. Do you? If so, show us.

Max