It is not a personal attack. Please show me where I attacked him in the
sentence. I think you're ascribing negative connotations to it. I could have
easily been referring to his cranium size.

The preponderance of evidence suggests and most reputable scientists agree
that human beings are the primary cause of global warming. Even Bush said
it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
Please show me where I attacked you personally? I don't even know you,
but I can guess.

You're a lot more than all ears. But, being a gentleman I won't say what
else is the larger contribution.

That is your paragraph. And that's a personal attack.


You have not presented much in the way of "evidence."

Oh. Lloyd provided numerous references. I provided several. So far you
haven't provided any. Your point?

Global warming is happening. Human beings are responsible for much of it.
The ice sheets of the world are melting a lot faster than we originally
thought. Those are the facts. It's time to do something about it.

When presented with scientific facts that fail to support anything you've
claimed in the foregoing paragraph, you deem the scientists who generated
those reports to lack credibility, you attack the poster personally, and
you provide no evidence to the contrary beyond your own regurgitation of
the pop-science dogma surrounding global warming. Now give me one reason
why anyone would believe you over Lloyd?


Max