"katy" wrote in message
...
Bob Crantz wrote:
Remember when Reagan said that?

Take a look:

http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824

Who is the biggest wimp on that graph?

Amen!
It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate
for cross-comparison...

An excellent point.

Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first
look at the results:

1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years.
2. Another war on an undefined enemy.
3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased.
4. Police state powers increase.
5. Massive increases in entitlement spending.

All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate.

Bush can approve or disapprove of them.

Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom.

Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp.

The choice is yours.

Amen!

PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde.
I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.

Glory!

PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old
blonde.
I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.


Glory!


Did she have on PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at
Costco on an old blonde.
I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.


Glory!


Was she wearing red patent leather Go Go boots?

Joe

Bob Crantz wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Bob Crantz wrote:

Remember when Reagan said that?

Take a look:

http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824

Who is the biggest wimp on that graph?

Amen!

It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate
for cross-comparison...


An excellent point.

Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first
look at the results:

1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years.
2. Another war on an undefined enemy.
3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased.
4. Police state powers increase.
5. Massive increases in entitlement spending.

All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate.

Bush can approve or disapprove of them.

Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom.

Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp.

The choice is yours.

Amen!

PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde.
I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.

Glory!


There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government
are on the same side...
Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it
means that Congress has also drifted away from their own
identification...

"katy" wrote in message
...
Bob Crantz wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Bob Crantz wrote:

Remember when Reagan said that?

Take a look:

http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824

Who is the biggest wimp on that graph?

Amen!

It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and
Senate for cross-comparison...


An excellent point.

Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's
first look at the results:

1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years.
2. Another war on an undefined enemy.
3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased.
4. Police state powers increase.
5. Massive increases in entitlement spending.

All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate.

Bush can approve or disapprove of them.

Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and
freedom.

Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp.

The choice is yours.

Amen!

PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old
blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.

Glory!
There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are
on the same side...
Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means
that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification...

Yet more brilliance!

Vote for gridlock. Get politicians at each other's throats!

Amen!

"katy" wrote in message
...
Bob Crantz wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Bob Crantz wrote:

Remember when Reagan said that?

Take a look:

http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824

Who is the biggest wimp on that graph?

Amen!

It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and
Senate for cross-comparison...


An excellent point.

Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's
first look at the results:

1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years.
2. Another war on an undefined enemy.
3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased.
4. Police state powers increase.
5. Massive increases in entitlement spending.

All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate.

Bush can approve or disapprove of them.

Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and
freedom.

Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp.

The choice is yours.

Amen!

PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old
blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.

Glory!
There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are
on the same side...
Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means
that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification...

How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had
democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and they
exercised their vetos a number of times.

Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't
vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to
improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved
among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with
those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican.

Max

Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Bob Crantz wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Bob Crantz wrote:


Remember when Reagan said that?

Take a look:

http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824

Who is the biggest wimp on that graph?

Amen!

It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and
Senate for cross-comparison...


An excellent point.

Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's
first look at the results:

1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years.
2. Another war on an undefined enemy.
3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased.
4. Police state powers increase.
5. Massive increases in entitlement spending.

All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate.

Bush can approve or disapprove of them.

Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and
freedom.

Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp.

The choice is yours.

Amen!

PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old
blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.

Glory!

There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are
on the same side...
Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means
that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification...


How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had
democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and they
exercised their vetos a number of times.

Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't
vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to
improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved
among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with
those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican.

Max


None of them had anywhere near the number of their constituents in
Congress that Bush has. The problems in this country need ro be
klaid down to all involved, not just one person. Congress is every
bit as much as fault as the President...

"katy" wrote in message
...
Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Bob Crantz wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Bob Crantz wrote:


Remember when Reagan said that?

Take a look:

http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824

Who is the biggest wimp on that graph?

Amen!

It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and
Senate for cross-comparison...


An excellent point.

Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's
first look at the results:

1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years.
2. Another war on an undefined enemy.
3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased.
4. Police state powers increase.
5. Massive increases in entitlement spending.

All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate.

Bush can approve or disapprove of them.

Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and
freedom.

Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp.

The choice is yours.

Amen!

PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old
blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.

Glory!

There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are
on the same side...
Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means
that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification...


How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had
democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and
they exercised their vetos a number of times.

Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who
wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this
to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings
haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen
precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a
conservative republican.

Max
None of them had anywhere near the number of their constituents in
Congress that Bush has. The problems in this country need ro be klaid
down to all involved, not just one person. Congress is every bit as much
as fault as the President...

I'd agree with that, Katy, except for the fact that the Prez is supposed to
fulfill a leadership role, especially when Congress is largely favorable to
him. He is pandering to Congress, too.

By the way, W passed within ten feet of me today. Motorcade drove by at
twice the speed limit and all the affected streets were closed for almost an
hour. The big limo with the flags has such dark windows--I suspect the Prez
was riding in any of the other vehicles, including the truck that looks like
a swat team vehicle, rather than his limo. Security.

Max

A few days ago the shrub flew over the house after visitng NREL.

Shouldn't he be working?

Amen!

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"katy" wrote in message
...
Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Bob Crantz wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


Bob Crantz wrote:


Remember when Reagan said that?

Take a look:

http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824

Who is the biggest wimp on that graph?

Amen!

It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and
Senate for cross-comparison...


An excellent point.

Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's
first look at the results:

1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years.
2. Another war on an undefined enemy.
3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased.
4. Police state powers increase.
5. Massive increases in entitlement spending.

All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate.

Bush can approve or disapprove of them.

Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and
freedom.

Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp.

The choice is yours.

Amen!

PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old
blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera.

Glory!

There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are
on the same side...
Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means
that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification...


How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had
democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and
they exercised their vetos a number of times.

Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who
wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this
to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his
ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and
they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to
be a conservative republican.

Max
None of them had anywhere near the number of their constituents in
Congress that Bush has. The problems in this country need ro be klaid
down to all involved, not just one person. Congress is every bit as much
as fault as the President...

I'd agree with that, Katy, except for the fact that the Prez is supposed
to fulfill a leadership role, especially when Congress is largely
favorable to him. He is pandering to Congress, too.

By the way, W passed within ten feet of me today. Motorcade drove by at
twice the speed limit and all the affected streets were closed for almost
an hour. The big limo with the flags has such dark windows--I suspect the
Prez was riding in any of the other vehicles, including the truck that
looks like a swat team vehicle, rather than his limo. Security.

Max

"Bob Crantz" wrote in message
ink.net...
A few days ago the shrub flew over the house after visitng NREL.

Shouldn't he be working?

He's campaigning . . . at US taxpayers' expense, of course. I guess every
other prez has done the same thing, so it's not just him.

Any idea what Air Force 1 flys for per hour?

Max

"Maxprop" wrote ...
The big limo with the flags has such dark windows--I
suspect the Prez
was ....

......mooning you, and you didn't even see it?

SV