Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Remember when Reagan said that?
Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Crantz" wrote in message nk.net... Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? No surprises there. Max |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Crantz wrote:
Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old
blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! Did she have on PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! Was she wearing red patent leather Go Go boots? Joe |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Crantz wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... Yet more brilliance! Vote for gridlock. Get politicians at each other's throats! Amen! |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and they exercised their vetos a number of times. Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Max |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and they exercised their vetos a number of times. Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Max None of them had anywhere near the number of their constituents in Congress that Bush has. The problems in this country need ro be klaid down to all involved, not just one person. Congress is every bit as much as fault as the President... |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maxprop" wrote
Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Whatever led you to believe that Bush (or Reagan) were conservatives. Goldwater was a conservative. Bush is a National Socialist. The differences between him and, say, Schumer are the same as those dividing Hitler and Stalin. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cool Idea for Make Some Cash | General | |||
Smedley Darlington Butler - USMC, Awarded two congressional medals of honor | General | |||
Amerika is Always at War | ASA |