Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
"NotPony" wrote in message news:LrEuf.1732$Pe6.483@trnddc08... Wouldn't it make sense to talk to a rigger about rigging? S. In the martix, no. John Cairns "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... : : : In my research for my book I interviewed 5 surveyors in NY, PA and FL : who specialized in sailboats. ALL prefered rod rigging over traditional : wire. ALL felt that it's virtually impervious to failure, so long as : the fittings were updated and NONE had seen a failure and only two had : even heard of rod rigging rigs failing and in both cases it was : actually the chainplate that had failed! ALL had inspected rod rigged : boats from the early 80's that were found to be in excellent condition. : Of course my boat is not very old and her rigging is like new with : terminals updated in 2004. : Bob, it's best to actually do some real research instead of posting : superficial info from Sailnet that you coppied and pasted. : : RB : 35s5 : NY : |
#12
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
have a hard time believing that rod rigging fails less than wire.
As Gary pointed out, rigging failure is rare compared to a fitting or chainplate cracking. That said, rod rigging is stronger and virtually impossible to break, where wire does and has parted under sail. I'll take the rod rigging every time thank you, especially on a boat in the fine condition that mine is in. I also had rod on the C&C 32 and it was bullet proof...really. RB 35s5 NY |
#13
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
It's not necessary for the material to be ferrous to do magnetic testing.
All it has to be is conductive. You can induce currents into the metal by means of an electric field (and yes, it can have circulation ie it is magnetic). The discontinuities in the induced current (due to cracks) will cause a net increase in the responsive magnetic field (even though it is not magnetic material - think - copper wire produces magnetic fields but it is non ferrous) or changes in the E field on the surface of the metal. There are films responsive to E fields, these can be used on the metal surface or you can use small electric field probes. You can even use the old standby of iron filings if you know what to look for. I prefer RCS measurements to look for cracks. Amen! wrote in message ps.com... The cracks shown in that link are exactly like the ones I found in my 20 yr old rigging. The cracks in mine were very difficult to find until I used fine sandpaper. They were all on the lower swaged end. Most of the cracks were under small brown stains that were the result of the stainless in the crack becoming non-stainless and rusting. They required a 10X magnifier to find. At work, I ground the fittings away to see how deep they went and they went through the entire fitting. I even used dye penetrant with no luck. I replaced all the rigging and lifelines last year. NOW, although thefittings and wire and rod are stainless, stainless can be slightly ferromagnetic and can be tested via flux leakage methods (I used to do magnetic NDT research). Furthermore, the area around a fatigue crack is less stainless and more ferromagnetic than the bulk material. This may allow testing via mag particle inspection (so-called magnafluxing). It is entirely that nobody has done this because they simply assumed that teh stainless material wouldnt allow this to work. Unfortunately, I threw the old rigging away so I cannot try this. |
#14
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
http://www.mac-ndt.com/app.cfm?App=2
wrote in message ps.com... The cracks shown in that link are exactly like the ones I found in my 20 yr old rigging. The cracks in mine were very difficult to find until I used fine sandpaper. They were all on the lower swaged end. Most of the cracks were under small brown stains that were the result of the stainless in the crack becoming non-stainless and rusting. They required a 10X magnifier to find. At work, I ground the fittings away to see how deep they went and they went through the entire fitting. I even used dye penetrant with no luck. I replaced all the rigging and lifelines last year. NOW, although thefittings and wire and rod are stainless, stainless can be slightly ferromagnetic and can be tested via flux leakage methods (I used to do magnetic NDT research). Furthermore, the area around a fatigue crack is less stainless and more ferromagnetic than the bulk material. This may allow testing via mag particle inspection (so-called magnafluxing). It is entirely that nobody has done this because they simply assumed that teh stainless material wouldnt allow this to work. Unfortunately, I threw the old rigging away so I cannot try this. |
#15
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
http://www.ndtint.com/amigo.htm wrote in message ps.com... The cracks shown in that link are exactly like the ones I found in my 20 yr old rigging. The cracks in mine were very difficult to find until I used fine sandpaper. They were all on the lower swaged end. Most of the cracks were under small brown stains that were the result of the stainless in the crack becoming non-stainless and rusting. They required a 10X magnifier to find. At work, I ground the fittings away to see how deep they went and they went through the entire fitting. I even used dye penetrant with no luck. I replaced all the rigging and lifelines last year. NOW, although thefittings and wire and rod are stainless, stainless can be slightly ferromagnetic and can be tested via flux leakage methods (I used to do magnetic NDT research). Furthermore, the area around a fatigue crack is less stainless and more ferromagnetic than the bulk material. This may allow testing via mag particle inspection (so-called magnafluxing). It is entirely that nobody has done this because they simply assumed that teh stainless material wouldnt allow this to work. Unfortunately, I threw the old rigging away so I cannot try this. |
#16
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
Bob:
Yes, that is eddy current testing. I have not yet considered it. I'd prefer to use mag particles (iron filings) as this does not require runing a probe along all possible surfaces. |
#17
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
How about sending an acoustic pulse along the rod rigging the same as a time
domain reflectometer works. The pulse speed is a property of material and tension and the reflectance a function of acoustic impedance. Cracks would raise the impedance. The cracks could be located along the length of the rod by simply applying the pulse signal at one point. http://www.tscm.com/riprcop.html wrote in message oups.com... Bob: Yes, that is eddy current testing. I have not yet considered it. I'd prefer to use mag particles (iron filings) as this does not require runing a probe along all possible surfaces. |
#18
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
Cracks would
raise the impedance. The cracks could be located along the length of the rod by simply applying the pulse signal at one point. Seems to me that for this to work well you'd need to remove the rod from the boat and tension it is some sort of way, equally. Then you might read cracks, but be unable to actually locate them, meaning a small non-dangerous imperfection in the rod might give a false reading. Seems like a tool that would get abused to sell a lot of uneeded rigging.. Just about every rig failure I've ever heard of was wire. While I'm sure rod has failed....I've never heard of it. Anyone know of a rod rigging failure they can point to online? I'm too sleepy to google today. RB 35s5 NY |
#19
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
Bob Crantz wrote:
How about sending an acoustic pulse along the rod rigging the same as a time domain reflectometer works. The pulse speed is a property of material and tension and the reflectance a function of acoustic impedance. Cracks would raise the impedance. The cracks could be located along the length of the rod by simply applying the pulse signal at one point. Sounds good to me, I don't belive tension (or compression) has anything to with the speed of transmission in a solid. Cheers Marty |
#20
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Rod Rigging - Hype?
Rob:
You don't have to remove the rigging at all. On the TDR pulse you can easily see the where the spreader touches to rod, you can run your hand up and down the rod and see its location on the TDR. Since sound waves don't propagate through cracks, the sound energy would be reflected back at the source and the location of the crack could easily be identified. All you need is a good piezo transducer that transmits and receives, a pulse generator (a simple circuit) and some display like an oscilloscope. You can even make a display on a laptop. With some signal processing you could really do some great analysis of the rigging. Think of a sonar with metal instead of water as the medium. One could even spot cracks and corrosion in the end fittings. Also think of a musical instrument. If the fret or neck on a guitar is damaged, it is easy to hear. These same principals apply to the TDR. Amen! "Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... Cracks would raise the impedance. The cracks could be located along the length of the rod by simply applying the pulse signal at one point. Seems to me that for this to work well you'd need to remove the rod from the boat and tension it is some sort of way, equally. Then you might read cracks, but be unable to actually locate them, meaning a small non-dangerous imperfection in the rod might give a false reading. Seems like a tool that would get abused to sell a lot of uneeded rigging.. Just about every rig failure I've ever heard of was wire. While I'm sure rod has failed....I've never heard of it. Anyone know of a rod rigging failure they can point to online? I'm too sleepy to google today. RB 35s5 NY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
standing rigging | Cruising | |||
How not to hype the news... | General |