In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:12:21 GMT, Commodore Joe Redcloud
said:

Actually, it's not documented at all. It's a pack of lies
intended to convince people like you to vote against Kerry,
and it worked. So relax.

So when the liberal T. Coppel interviewed Kerry's commanding officer on
Nightline I was hearing things? Why won't Kerry release his military
records?

Why won't Bushco stop lying about Iraq?

Refresh my memory... What medals did Bush get for serving in Viet Nam? Where was
Dick Cheney stationed? When Bush was a drunken cokehead wifebeater, did he
inhale?

So I take it both you and Ganz would like to change the subject.

So, I take it that you have nothing to say to defend Bushco.


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

So I take it both you and Ganz would like to change the subject.


Jonathan Ganz wrote:
So, I take it that you have nothing to say to defend Bushco.


Dave, has point, Jon. "Defending BushCo" has nothing to do
with the mendacity of the 'Swift Boat Veterans For (cough)
Truth' advertising campaign.

DSK

In article ,
DSK wrote:
So I take it both you and Ganz would like to change the subject.


Jonathan Ganz wrote:
So, I take it that you have nothing to say to defend Bushco.


Dave, has point, Jon. "Defending BushCo" has nothing to do
with the mendacity of the 'Swift Boat Veterans For (cough)
Truth' advertising campaign.

I believe the thread morphed into Kerry being a coward. I asserted
that he was a hero.

Getting those wackos to attack him is a direct reflection upon Bushco,
who probably got them the traction they needed. That makes Bushco a
bunch of liars, etc.

I was happy to defend Kerry. Why is Dave not happy to defend Bushco?

Or, did I miss something?

Oh course, it really doesn't matter, since Dave has me killfiled. :-)

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com