BoatBanter.com - My Boat is....

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)

- ASA (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/)

- - My Boat is.... (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/61608-my-boat.html)

Ugh ......... we don't know that. What rig is in the boat? What keel?

There's about a 25 second per mile difference between those boats
depending on what it has.

Tall rig with wing, currently rated 120 in his area. Most tall rigs had
the deep keel. I expect a rating around 123 or 125 here. He's owned
both versions and found the wing is faster on some tacks and showed a
tiny pointing deficit. Downwind, the wing is slower. Then again I'm
getting a boat with a inventory of mylar sails that you'd never own.
They're recent, rated between 8 & 9 by the local loft and cost just
under 10K (genoa, jib and main) in 2003. The dacron stuff aboard is
also in very good shape and the spin is new. Sorry, Loco. She's going
to be a lot of fun. And boat for boat I'll pass any Depress 30 of
course! Then, back at the slip I'll flip on the theatre system, emjoy
the cool AC and watch the sun go down...on the 20 inch LCD TV!!! Good
times for us and of course we could care less about racing...just out
for some fun sailing on a comfortable boat...with a swim platform, huge
cockpit and beautiful interior! Fun, fun, fun!
And it's KILLING YOU!!!! I think it already knocked a few years off
Scotty's sad life. Good night, sad little boy with the sad little 30
footer!

RB

I'd rather have a slow 'real' boat than a fast imaginary one any
day.

I'd rather have both...and I do.

RB

Dont think so Rob, RedCloud can do a steady 9 knots for weeks on
end.

35s5's have been able to go faster than 9 knots. She'll also point
higher and accelerate faster. Nothing wrong with your boat, Joe. I like
it just fine, but it's another animal entirely.

RB

"DSK" wrote in message

Why would a 'sugar scoop' transom be a problem in a seaway, given
mostly-competent design & construction of the boat?

Well... it's a fgree entry point for inwash. Not a terrible thing if you
have proper watertight companionway fittings and will drain as easily as it
fills .... but still the design allows much more water into the cockpit
than the standard enclosed type.

That's because they were either not fast boats to begin with, or because
they were incompetently sailed.

Well that would assume my competency and the assumption the other vessels
were crewed by incompetents. I doubt that was the case Doug. I attribute it
to the facility of my vessel in rough seas. They seemed to "pound" much more
to windward. They also seemed to lack momentum to overcome the sea state.

On it's best day, your boat is going to have a very hard time putting in
200+ miles days, which should be easily achievable with a racier boat in
good driving conditions.

I can maintain an easy 7 knots in good winds, even in roughest seas. Some of
the other vessels can surpass that ... but not continuously for long
durations. That may be my boat's advantage.

Would you call a Niagra 35 a "light to moderate displacement" boat? It's
SA/D is a whopping 16 and the D/L is 350! Very nice boat, but hardly what
anybody is going to consider "racy."

It's a much larger vessel..... I don't know enough about racing to know if
it's that fast or not. It has taken a lot of races in Yellowknife.

As for going DDW in a blow, it can be done... and is done... pretty
regularly by good racing crews, unless it's faster to reach. Shucks, I've
raced Lightnings and 470s, including a few memorable spinnaker runs, in
winds north of 40 knots. It's fun!

I met with the Captains after the race... none to a man would have dared try
that with their boats except for one really competitive racer... he dropped
a reef and changed headsails to catch up... he broached. Everyone was amazed
at the downwind tracking ability of my boat. She was a dream to sail during
that race and never taxed the crew. Boats ranged form a C&C27 to a Frasier
42. the Contessa 32s couldn't even qualify to be within reach of me and the
Niagara 35 was 2 miles behind when I crossed the line. They Niagara finished
2nd. place.

I can't match a fin keeler on harbour races... my vessel isn't designed for
that. Given the proper conditions.... it can achieve it's potential and
that will outstrip some racing designs. Overall it's a comfortable vessel
with an adequate turn of speed. It's forgiving and well mannered.

CM

My Boat is.... Insured, I hope . . .

Hey Capt. Rob! Have you any insurance on your new boat? Better get it
outta Tampa before this week-end. Looks like Wilma might pay a
visit to the Florida west coast.

CN

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com...
| Ugh ......... we don't know that. What rig is in the boat? What keel?
|
| There's about a 25 second per mile difference between those boats
| depending on what it has.
|
| Tall rig with wing, currently rated 120 in his area. Most tall rigs had
| the deep keel. I expect a rating around 123 or 125 here. He's owned
| both versions and found the wing is faster on some tacks and showed a
| tiny pointing deficit. Downwind, the wing is slower. Then again I'm
| getting a boat with a inventory of mylar sails that you'd never own.
| They're recent, rated between 8 & 9 by the local loft and cost just
| under 10K (genoa, jib and main) in 2003. The dacron stuff aboard is
| also in very good shape and the spin is new. Sorry, Loco. She's going
| to be a lot of fun. And boat for boat I'll pass any Depress 30 of
| course! Then, back at the slip I'll flip on the theatre system, emjoy
| the cool AC and watch the sun go down...on the 20 inch LCD TV!!! Good
| times for us and of course we could care less about racing...just out
| for some fun sailing on a comfortable boat...with a swim platform, huge
| cockpit and beautiful interior! Fun, fun, fun!
| And it's KILLING YOU!!!! I think it already knocked a few years off
| Scotty's sad life. Good night, sad little boy with the sad little 30
| footer!
|
| RB
|

My Boat is.... Insured, I hope . . .

Why would a 'sugar scoop' transom be a problem in a seaway, given
mostly-competent design & construction of the boat?

Capt.Mooron wrote:
Well... it's a fgree entry point for inwash.

Not if the boat is designed with good reserve bouyancy in the aft sections.

.... Not a terrible thing if you
have proper watertight companionway fittings and will drain as easily as it
fills .... but still the design allows much more water into the cockpit
than the standard enclosed type.

I disagree strongly. In fact, having sailed many open transom boats in
pretty good seas, I can remember very few times having water come in
astern. And those times were in waves steep enough (or breaking) that
they would have washed over top of any transom (or pointy stern) too.

In fact, the one boat I've sailed a lot and is mentionable as having a
tendency to stick her stern into following seas is an old classic
counter-stern sloop. Elegant, and from the looks of that long overhang
you'd think she'd lift readily to waves from astern. But that turned out
not to eb the case. A great boat in many other respects though, and
beautiful enough to be forgiven this flaw... besides, she also had the
classic small cockpit...

That's because they were either not fast boats to begin with, or because
they were incompetently sailed.

Amend that overly harsh statement to "not sailed with high degree of
racing competence."

Well that would assume my competency and the assumption the other vessels
were crewed by incompetents. I doubt that was the case Doug. I attribute it
to the facility of my vessel in rough seas. They seemed to "pound" much more
to windward. They also seemed to lack momentum to overcome the sea state.

If they're pounding and "lack momentum" then they're being sailed
wrong... specifically, they are pinching. There is a time to feather up
when overpowered, but it's not when consistently overpowered with seas
sweeping you to leeward. Also, boats don't pound (or at least, nowhere
near as much) when depowered & footed off.

On it's best day, your boat is going to have a very hard time putting in
200+ miles days, which should be easily achievable with a racier boat in
good driving conditions.

I can maintain an easy 7 knots in good winds, even in roughest seas. Some of
the other vessels can surpass that ... but not continuously for long
durations. That may be my boat's advantage.

What do you call "long duration"? All the way across? Why would any
competent crew stop driving their vessel when sailing conditions were good?

As for going DDW in a blow, it can be done... and is done... pretty
regularly by good racing crews, unless it's faster to reach. Shucks, I've
raced Lightnings and 470s, including a few memorable spinnaker runs, in
winds north of 40 knots. It's fun!

I met with the Captains after the race... none to a man would have dared try
that with their boats except for one really competitive racer... he dropped
a reef and changed headsails to catch up... he broached.

And didn't get going again?

Hell, I've raced some lightweight flyers that broached under spinnaker
every 5 minutes, and still hit 18 knots and passed boats on the run.

Like I said, the problem here is that you're apparently not racing
against guys that are driving hard & fast.

I can't match a fin keeler on harbour races... my vessel isn't designed for
that. Given the proper conditions.... it can achieve it's potential and
that will outstrip some racing designs.

Y'know, every crab crusher sailor says that, then when I ask "what
racing designs" it turns out that they consider a slightly less
crab-crushy boat to be a "hot-shot racer" and don't really want to put
it to the test.

I'm kind of surprised that the Contessa 32(s) sailed in your club can't
keep up with you in a blow, those are supposed to be good heavy weather
boats.

... Overall it's a comfortable vessel
with an adequate turn of speed. It's forgiving and well mannered.

And those are very good characteristics. Good steering characteristics,
especially in following seas, is also very desirable.

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

"DSK" wrote in message

Not if the boat is designed with good reserve bouyancy in the aft
sections.

Well that's the ringer isn't it? A sugar scoop would lend to waterline ...
but not nessecarily to boyancy

I disagree strongly. In fact, having sailed many open transom boats in
pretty good seas, I can remember very few times having water come in
astern. And those times were in waves steep enough (or breaking) that they
would have washed over top of any transom (or pointy stern) too.

Now there rears the head of the Dragon of Reserve Buoyancy.
I would take issue with that statement having experienced both types of
vessels in comparitive situations.

In fact, the one boat I've sailed a lot and is mentionable as having a
tendency to stick her stern into following seas is an old classic
counter-stern sloop. Elegant, and from the looks of that long overhang
you'd think she'd lift readily to waves from astern. But that turned out
not to eb the case. A great boat in many other respects though, and
beautiful enough to be forgiven this flaw... besides, she also had the
classic small cockpit...

More Reserve bouyancy than a sugar scoop??

Amend that overly harsh statement to "not sailed with high degree of
racing competence."

Maybe not......?

If they're pounding and "lack momentum" then they're being sailed wrong...
specifically, they are pinching. There is a time to feather up when
overpowered, but it's not when consistently overpowered with seas sweeping
you to leeward. Also, boats don't pound (or at least, nowhere near as
much) when depowered & footed off.

Although I agree with the base contention... mitigating factors are always a
reality.
Sea states can be vary with seasonal conditions. I sail in unprotected
waters... for the most part.
Steep short seas with breaking tops are common. So are 40ft+ waves entering
my harbour. Doug... those are a steep climb.
I've been in water that has impeded forward progress to a waypoint.

What do you call "long duration"? All the way across? Why would any
competent crew stop driving their vessel when sailing conditions were
good?

Well that depends dosen't it.... 12 hours could be a "duration". Depends on
watch times and crew condition.

And didn't get going again?

Of course... but in that type of wind......... minutes are hours lost

Hell, I've raced some lightweight flyers that broached under spinnaker
every 5 minutes, and still hit 18 knots and passed boats on the run.

I'm certain you have Doug.......

Like I said, the problem here is that you're apparently not racing against
guys that are driving hard & fast.

That could be......

Y'know, every crab crusher sailor says that, then when I ask "what racing
designs" it turns out that they consider a slightly less crab-crushy boat
to be a "hot-shot racer" and don't really want to put it to the test.

Heh... when you enter a race... you race the field

I'm kind of surprised that the Contessa 32(s) sailed in your club can't
keep up with you in a blow, those are supposed to be good heavy weather
boats.

Yeah they are.... I'm saying my boat is substantially faster. It's a proven
fact.

And those are very good characteristics. Good steering characteristics,
especially in following seas, is also very desirable.

I like my boat Doug....... :-)

CM

Hey Nutsy,

If you're trucking it up, please post pictures of her bottom. Did you
say she has a Wing Keel? Is she does, she'll do well in the Sound. A
wing keel and good bottom should get you to a lot of better anchorages
early.

http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsPage

http://community.webtv.net/tassail/Pneuma

Then again I'm
getting a boat with a inventory of mylar sails that you'd never own.

More shoot from the hip comments. I hope you never get involved with
off track betting.