Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why do you think that they're a bit more safe than a monohull of
comparable capacity? Jonathan Ganz wrote: Besides being immune from sinking? More stable, which means easier on the crew for long passages.. less chance of injury for the same reason. Agreed, and less chance of stuff breaking as it falls to the low side. I dunno if they're truly "easier on the crew" since the motion is very bouncy & jerky in any kind of wave action. I guess if you love that kind of boat and sail them all the time, you get used to the motion. The main reason I'd consider them safer is the speed- not for "running away from storms" which is malarkey, but rather because they need a smaller & thus more easily predictable & more accurately judged weather window for any given hop. Dan, I have no experience with the Dragonfly or Telstar other than ogling them at boat shows. I can say that I think the Dragonfly is very well built, and that neither that nor the Telstar is significantly roomier than the Corsair series. Of course, as Doug points out, no boat or design is perfect. Yes there is, but I'm not telling which one ![]() DSK |