Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No idea why No-Boat Crantz keeps yapping about trains and MIT cables.
I don't expect that you ever will, given your cognitive tools. Right, but I've never owned MIT cables, so do tell us what he's talking about. RB |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Rob" wrote:
No idea why No-Boat Crantz keeps yapping about trains and MIT cables. I don't expect that you ever will, given your cognitive tools. Right, but I've never owned MIT cables, so do tell us what he's talking about. What is the characteristic impedance of your cables at 25Mrads**-1 ? Cheers Martin |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the characteristic impedance of your cables at 25Mrads**-1 ?
Martin, I'm using a Enhance Theatre system with Revel components. There are no cables. RB |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Rob" wrote:
No idea why No-Boat Crantz keeps yapping about trains and MIT cables. Martin Baxter wrote: I don't expect that you ever will, given your cognitive tools. Now that was cruel... funny, and also true, but cruel. DSK |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amen!
"Captain Joe Redcloud©" wrote in message ... On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:10:17 GMT, "Bob Crantz" wrote: Where are the MIT cables? Now THAT is funny! MIT cables are manufactured in the back room of Landover Baptist Church. "Capt. Rob" wrote in message roups.com... I'm now running Revel F30s with a Revel with the Ultima Sub. Rears are Revel M20's. Kimber cable all around with Outlaw power. I'm looking for a wall mountable LCD today to replace the Panasonic wide screen. It's more than 2 years old already. Total cost of speakers were 6K with internal cable mods. Sound is very relaxed and smooth, though less critical than my ribbons. I'm pleased because the whole system is still under 10K even when you add the amps and screen. RB |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Liar!
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.sta nford.edu!news-spur1.maxwe ll.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!ngpeer.news.aol.com! audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail Lines: 20 X-Admin: From: (Bobsprit) Newsgroups: alt.sailing.asa Date: 28 Nov 2002 16:35:01 GMT References: Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com Subject: Some Inspiration (long but true) Message-ID: I've tested them from cheap to the most expensive. What a joke. Please outline your testing methodology. Sound By Singer, Audio Breakthroughs and other stores I'm friendly with over the years have conducted their own listener tests. No one, not ONE person was ever able to pick system variations based on cable changes. No one can tell a difference between high end kimber cable and cheap Monster cable. I've tried it on my VERY articulate ribbons and B&W CDM. No one can tell them apart. I currenlt use MIT stuff, which was a gift. (400 dollar cables). They are out to "dress" the system along with some nice candles. Nothing effects the quality of the system more than speakers, followed by source and amp. Wires, racks and power supplies are for the foolish who don't test what they buy. Recently I had the chance to borrow a power line conditioner (Richard Gray model) and NO ONE could here a difference. Gilligan bought into the scam that even Bose and Emerson owners know about. RB "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ups.com... No idea why No-Boat Crantz keeps yapping about trains and MIT cables. I don't expect that you ever will, given your cognitive tools. Right, but I've never owned MIT cables, so do tell us what he's talking about. RB |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Liar!
And that observation, Bob, is why I am constantly able to drag this group around by a leash of my own design and whim. Never had MIT cables. I did borrow a pair once. Maybe. RB |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|