Liar!

Path:
archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.sta nford.edu!news-spur1.maxwe
ll.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!ngpeer.news.aol.com!
audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 20
X-Admin:
From: (Bobsprit)
Newsgroups: alt.sailing.asa
Date: 28 Nov 2002 16:35:01 GMT
References:
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Some Inspiration (long but true)
Message-ID:

I've tested them from cheap
to the most expensive. What a joke.


Please outline your testing methodology.

Sound By Singer, Audio Breakthroughs and other stores I'm friendly with over
the years have conducted their own listener tests. No one, not ONE person
was
ever able to pick system variations based on cable changes. No one can tell
a
difference between high end kimber cable and cheap Monster cable. I've tried
it
on my VERY articulate ribbons and B&W CDM. No one can tell them apart. I
currenlt use MIT stuff, which was a gift. (400 dollar cables). They are out
to
"dress" the system along with some nice candles.
Nothing effects the quality of the system more than speakers, followed by
source and amp. Wires, racks and power supplies are for the foolish who
don't
test what they buy. Recently I had the chance to borrow a power line
conditioner (Richard Gray model) and NO ONE could here a difference.
Gilligan bought into the scam that even Bose and Emerson owners know about.

RB

"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
ups.com...
No idea why No-Boat Crantz keeps yapping about trains and MIT cables.



I don't expect that you ever will, given your cognitive tools.


Right, but I've never owned MIT cables, so do tell us what he's talking
about.

RB