JG wrote:

Why would I do that if I had in fact believed that there was a reason
to complain?

There was no reason to complain, you hypocrite. He was doing nothing worse
than you've done countless times.


... Or, better stated, what if I did? I thought he violated
the "regulations" and they had no choice. Would they now decide to
ignore their regulations because of me?

Back-stabbers like you make me puke. You stepped outside the interplay of
personas that make this group what it is, and ****ed around with someone's
real life. This is different from what wen't on between Neal and Katy - he
as much as announced what he was going to do, and she was stupid enough to
rise to the bait, but I find you utterly *vile*.

"utterly *vile*."

BINGO!

Joe wrote:
"utterly *vile*."

BINGO!

Thank you.

FWIW: the noise tactics weren't what convinced me, it was Mooron's calm,
matter-of-fact explanation.


--
Wally
www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm
www.wally.myby.co.uk

Unlike my calm, matter-of-fact response to your query....

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Wally" wrote in message
k...
Joe wrote:
"utterly *vile*."

BINGO!

Thank you.

FWIW: the noise tactics weren't what convinced me, it was Mooron's calm,
matter-of-fact explanation.


--
Wally
www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm
www.wally.myby.co.uk

So, I politely answered your question, and this is your response? Talk about
vile and hypocritical...

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Wally" wrote in message
k...
JG wrote:

Why would I do that if I had in fact believed that there was a reason
to complain?

There was no reason to complain, you hypocrite. He was doing nothing worse
than you've done countless times.


... Or, better stated, what if I did? I thought he violated
the "regulations" and they had no choice. Would they now decide to
ignore their regulations because of me?

Back-stabbers like you make me puke. You stepped outside the interplay of
personas that make this group what it is, and ****ed around with someone's
real life. This is different from what wen't on between Neal and Katy - he
as much as announced what he was going to do, and she was stupid enough to
rise to the bait, but I find you utterly *vile*.

"JG" wrote:

So, I politely answered your question, and this is your response? Talk
about vile and hypocritical...

Calling yourself names, Jon? How appropriate!

LP

Ditto.

SBV


"Wally" wrote

Back-stabbers like you make me puke. You stepped outside the
interplay of
personas that make this group what it is, and ****ed around with
someone's
real life. This is different from what wen't on between Neal and
Katy - he
as much as announced what he was going to do, and she was stupid
enough to
rise to the bait, but I find you utterly *vile*.

"Wally" wrote:

Back-stabbers like you make me puke. You stepped outside the interplay of
personas that make this group what it is, and ****ed around with someone's
real life. This is different from what wen't on between Neal and Katy - he
as much as announced what he was going to do, and she was stupid enough to
rise to the bait, but I find you utterly *vile*.

So why should katysails report *me* because of Capt. Neal and katysails
flamewar? Should my children lose their cable cartoon network and movie
channels, not to mention playing games online with their friends and our
phone service because I was defending myself with mere words in katysails
instigated flamewar because she hated Capt. Neal? seriously, no one seems
to be able to answer this question

LP

Lady Pilot wrote:
:
: So why should katysails report *me* because of Capt. Neal and
: katysails flamewar? Should my children lose their cable cartoon
: network and movie channels, not to mention playing games online with
: their friends and our phone service because I was defending myself
: with mere words in katysails instigated flamewar because she hated
: Capt. Neal? seriously, no one seems to be able to answer this
: question

IMHO the answer is no. she shouldn't be able to unless you committed real
net-abuse. mere words on a newsgroup don't qualify as that to any decent
admin who actually bothers to investigate complaints. KKKaty's method seems
to be to send her unjustified whines from mutiple addresses to appear to the
admin as if she isn't the only one, perhaps in the hope that the admin will
see multiple complaints and TOS the account without checking out the facts.
:
: LP

--
Steve Leyland
mhm32x16 Smeeter#24 WSD#41
flower: three 6 four 9 five 8 eight 9
em ess en: my 1st name at purgatory dot org
Alcatroll Labs Inc (bongwater maintenance dept)
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/
http://www.radioxanadu.tk

=^MEOW MEOW ARMY^=

Humor is mankind's greatest blessing - Mark Twain
================================================== ====================
My suggestion is to completely ignore idiots like Leland. They are the
lowest form of pond scum. People like him have tried unsuccessfully in
the past to disrupt the newsgroup. The best medicine is to completely
ignore them. As I'm sure you'll see, they're most intelligent response
is to yell nasty names. Other than that, they have nothing.

jg, netKKKop, alt.sailing.asa
================================================== ====================
"Warning to all:
Steve Leyland is a trolling **** of the highest order. Killfile the
muppet now and move on. Even the briefest of searches on his past
UseNet posts will reveal the truth. You have been warned. *plonk*"

bear, netKKKop, uk.rec.motorcycles
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best lesson I was ever given about usenet came about six years
ago when someone told me to take everything, and everyone, with a
mine full of salt, at least in this context, as it can either be art,
trolls, or someone being serious, and you never know quite which. Me,
I just, mostly, don't give a ****. Some of the most entertaining
usenetizens are the kooks in the belfrey...

very wise words from candle, alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"I went to the Garden of Love,
And saw what I never had seen;
A Chapel was built in the midst,
Where I used to play on the green.

And the gates of this Chapel were shut
And "Thou shalt not," writ over the door;
So I turned to the Garden of Love
That so many sweet flowers bore.

And I saw it was filled with graves,
And tombstones where flowers should be;
And priests in black gowns were walking their rounds,
And binding with briars my joys and desires."

William Blake.
================================================== ====================
"When the Earth has been ravaged and the animals are dying, a tribe of
people from all races, creeds and colours shall put their faith in
deeds, not words, and make the land green again. They shall be known as
Warriors of the Rainbow, protectors of the environment."

Native American prophecy


|\ _.-'~~""'~`'~)
/, ~-,__,,,.'~ ,-;;--''
|,4) ./ ' ; ;/'
'-~~;'@ ( ; ;
_.--'' _.-_..' .;.'
(,_..----''' (,..--''

Meow

"Steve Leyland"wrote:
Lady Pilot wrote:
:
: So why should katysails report *me* because of Capt. Neal and
: katysails flamewar? Should my children lose their cable cartoon
: network and movie channels, not to mention playing games online with
: their friends and our phone service because I was defending myself
: with mere words in katysails instigated flamewar because she hated
: Capt. Neal? seriously, no one seems to be able to answer this
: question

IMHO the answer is no. she shouldn't be able to unless you committed real
net-abuse. mere words on a newsgroup don't qualify as that to any decent
admin who actually bothers to investigate complaints. KKKaty's method
seems
to be to send her unjustified whines from mutiple addresses to appear to
the
admin as if she isn't the only one, perhaps in the hope that the admin
will
see multiple complaints and TOS the account without checking out the
facts.

It's really sad to see people like katy haight and ganz wasting admins time
with frivilous abuse complaints.

LP