"Lady Pilot" wrote brilliantly in message news:LZt3e.15354$TZ.14107@okepread06...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote:

"Fred Hall" wrote:

Why don't you just kill file him, Ole Thom?

How can you justify censorship on one hand and subscribe to uncensored
speech on the other? [Databasix]

It's simple, Capt. Mooron. Let me see if I can make it simple enough for
the whiners of this group.

When a person doesn't like what someone writes, you simply plonk them,
otherwise known as a kill file or bozo bin. You don't go the katysails and
Ganz route and report them to their NSP or ISP.

In other words, when you make the decision to kill file, you are not
censoring anyone else's right to be able to read that person if they chose
to do so. To file a complaint to someone's provider is nothing less than
chicken **** behavior, which only cowards would engage in...

Understand now?


Good writing, LP!

May I append to your cogent thoughts that one can also identify netKKKop
sympathizers when they show obvious support for netKKKops?

The only real difference between a netKKKop and a NetKKKop sympathizer
is there is *little* difference. Both are the enemy.

Old Thom is a netKKKop sympathizer as is Lonny B, as is Maxprop, as is Scout
(of late - he's gotten off-track), as is Scotty (of late) as is BB and anybody else
who supports Haight and Ganz - two know netKKKops.

Please consider again my post titled, "Demonstrably Stupid". The above misguided
folks define the term. They take a public stand against freedom of speech.

CN