|
You bought a boat?
"Scout" wrote in message ... Ole Thom, You're the Dutch Uncle and the mentor this group so sorely needs. I'm happy to see, that in spite of some occasional sassing, even the toughest posters here can't seem to hide their respect for your wisdom! I only wish you were still in Pennsylvania so we could sail together. Scout |
"Scout" wrote in message ... Get a clue Neal. YOU were the comic relief and you just didn't know it. Your tongue-in-cheek posts of the past were worth reading but your well has become poisoned. Dig deeper and you might just save yourself. As of now, you're no more than a bitter old clown! Focus less on being a sailor and more on being a man. Scout Among the things that make a man is a firm grasp on reality. I'm doing just fine, thank you. Contrary to what you wrote, I don't exist for anybody's entertainment. I post here because I wish to. It is my right. Anybody who is not interested in what I have to say can ignore me or killfile me. Anybody who attempts to take away my rights to free speech is fair game in a war of words and a manipulation of the media to the advantage of the most savvy. Haight and Ganz lost in their attempts to censor me. They were outwitted, outgunned, outflanked and outfoxed. Any nonsense about my outwitting those two clowns and rubbing their faces in their defeat resulting in innocent people being punished is just that - nonsense. If you or anybody else can't take the heat then stay out of the kitchen. If you're here, you're not an innocent bystander. One way or the other you're a participant. Don't like that kind of entertainment? Fine with me, then don't involve yourself in it. Anybody who is embittered because their entertainment no longer fits some mold they produced has issues that are definitely not my concern. Thom's ranting about destroying a newsgroup is delusional. Any so-called destruction is a misconstruing of reality based on paranoia. Thom could just as easily claim I created this group and his observations would be just as valid as the destruction hypothesis (for Thom, that is). Let the old man think what he wishes to think. If he wishes to think things that cause him to sound out of touch with reality, that's his business. One would think, however, that somebody of Thom's age and failing health would not sweat the details. If I were him, I'd put on a happy face and enjoy the years he's got left to him. The world exist as one views it. It is different for everybody. Attempting to stake a claim on a piece of the world to keep it the same as your mold dictates it needs to be for your comfort is not exactly an exercise in rational thought. Frustration will be your reward. Think about it. CN |
Scotty wrote:
yellow eye? Yellow thing with eye. His newsreader is presumably set up to show smileys as graphics. -- Wally www.artbywally.com/FiatPandaRally/index.htm www.wally.myby.co.uk |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Among the things that make a man is a firm grasp on reality. I'm doing just fine, thank you. I'm glad you think so. The reality is that you're as responsible for the thing you're bitching most about. You brag about hacking into and damaging other peoples' personal property (i.e., you tresspass on private property) and you call this honorable? People like you are the reason society is burdened down with rules and government. You are the cause of big government. You can't control your own actions so society sets up rules to outline common decency for you. How ironic that you will not take full or even partial responsibility for your actions! Haight and Ganz lost in their attempts to censor me. They were outwitted, outgunned, outflanked and outfoxed. You mean out flonked! flonk flonk flonk flonk!! Bring on the Harpies! Pathetic! If you or anybody else can't take the heat then stay out of the kitchen. If you're here, you're not an innocent bystander. One way or the other you're a participant. What heat? Of course I'm a participant - duh! Don't like that kind of entertainment? Fine with me, then don't involve yourself in it. Why do you ask a question and then answer for me? Again with the contol issues! The world exist as one views it. It is different for everybody. Attempting to stake a claim on a piece of the world to keep it the same as your mold dictates it needs to be for your comfort is not exactly an exercise in rational thought. Frustration will be your reward. Think about it. You think I'm frustrated? I'm just killing time. Scout |
Yes I do.
Sorry your Afro-Canadian feeling are upset but I know us Yanks don't sit right with them anyhow. Won't bother you again; no skin off my ass! Not happy but I'll live. Ole Thom |
CN,
Go post another three or four hundred "Tee Hee" and cool off. Then maybe you can come down to REALITY. Chill out. Go see LP and clean your pipes out and rejoin the human race See Ya, Ole Thom |
Scotty wrote: "Flying Tadpole" wrote the spoofs is they are definitely not funny nor witty nor vaguely clever. and you think FT is? ;) Jeez Scotty, don't upset me this early in the morning. And I note with cold clarity that you're using the same signoff as the tee-hee-ing cryptofascist/ultra leftie, you know, that little yellow thing with the eye swollen shut? I gave no critique, no opinion, I merely asked John a question. Is tadpole skin really *that* thin? A common misconception, commonly made by common-minded commoners. A tadpole's skin, indeed any amphibian's, is not so much thin as porous and highly sensitive. Add to this the developmental stage, in eggs open to the outside environment without even a shell. As a result, amphibians become excellent monitoring agents of the health (or otherwise) of their aquatic environment, and their physiological and/or behavioural responses can be used to detect quite minute changes in temper, condition, and accession of pollutants, radionuclides and general ****. -- Flying Tadpole ------------------------- http://www.ace.net.au/schooner http://music.download.com/timfatchen |
hey, I was gonna invite you too! (we need the keys)
Scout "Scotty" wrote in message ... You bought a boat? "Scout" wrote in message ... Ole Thom, You're the Dutch Uncle and the mentor this group so sorely needs. I'm happy to see, that in spite of some occasional sassing, even the toughest posters here can't seem to hide their respect for your wisdom! I only wish you were still in Pennsylvania so we could sail together. Scout |
It's a combo.
"Scout" wrote in message ... hey, I was gonna invite you too! (we need the keys) Scout "Scotty" wrote in message ... You bought a boat? "Scout" wrote in message ... Ole Thom, You're the Dutch Uncle and the mentor this group so sorely needs. I'm happy to see, that in spite of some occasional sassing, even the toughest posters here can't seem to hide their respect for your wisdom! I only wish you were still in Pennsylvania so we could sail together. Scout |
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message Sorry your Afro-Canadian feeling are upset but I know us Yanks don't sit right with them anyhow. That statement speaks volumes... CM |
Well Guys;
We got our "Bar Fight" Bar Slut and all!!!! Stand back Scot, give Scout room, he's doing fine. He's got a guy named Wally and the two of them are cleaning house, So far the Slut's relatives have kept their heads down and on this third day of April I haven't seen anything of CN? |
"Thom Stewart" wrote and on this third day of April I haven't seen anything of CN? Need to either check your eyeglasses or your WebTV, old boy! Need to lose the obsession. CN |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message Need to lose the obsession. What Thom needs to lose his delusion of importance and weight his opinion may carry. He seems very full of himself lately. CM |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:6EY3e.128248$ZO2.126259@edtnps84... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message Need to lose the obsession. What Thom needs to lose his delusion of importance and weight his opinion may carry. He seems very full of himself lately. CM It's ironic that Thom confers upon you and I attributes which he is displaying in spades lately. If he wasn't so strident and cocksure, I might think there is a method to his madness. Nah! He ain't that smart and he's not that good a writer. He's just losing his grip on reality, I'm afraid. He needs our prayers. Senile dementia has as one of its onset symptoms an inflation of importance and concern with self. CN |
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Well Guys; We got our "Bar Fight" Bar Slut and all!!!! Stand back Scot, give Scout room, OK, I'll just stand back here behind these rum bottles. Scotty |
CN,
I thought sure you were tagged. I'm glad I was Wrong. OT to the greatest man on the planet(G) |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message "John Cairns" wrote snipped snippet worst part about the spoofs is they are definitely not funny nor witty nor vaguely clever. John Cairns And you are? John: Jerry Seinfeld Neal: Al Gore Max |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... John, I do believe you will find a lot of the group agreeing with you about the "whining baby" Just wish I was sure it wasn't Neal posting from her 'puter. I'm not sure his cruise isn't to Oklahoma rather than Bahamas. Oh well, I'm proud of the way the Group stirred up BS and circulated fresh air into the mess that a few created Ole Thom Seems to me YOU are the one always whining about something or another lately, Thom. Ever hear the expression, "People who live in glass houses should not throw stones?" CN With respect to the Unified Church of the Microwave Whiner, you are the Pope, Neal. Ever hear the expression, "Shrimp should not be kept in the cedar bucket in which one ****s."? Probably not--I just made it up. Max |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message Please consider again my post titled, "Demonstrably Stupid". The above misguided folks define the term. They take a public stand against freedom of speech. Neither you nor Lady Pile It have responded to my queries: 1) is it free speech to attribute to others that which you've said yourself, especially when such attribution may injure the party to whom it is attributed? 2) is anything anyone chooses to say protected under the auspices of the First Amendment? (ie--can one yell "FIRE!" in a crowded venue?), and 3) shouldn't illegal or illegitimate actions have consequences (a fundamental conservative value)? The concept of the netcop is nothing new. But it is a popular urban myth that netcops are necessarily wrong or bad. Usenet started out many years ago as a means of communication between engineers and scientists--a forum for esoteric exchange between peers, as it were. Slowly and insidiously it become corrupted by those who would use it for less enlightening purposes, such as the myriad newsgroups that clog Usenet today. The engineers and scientists attempted to put a halt to the nonsense and noise, but to no avail. Their original NGs are all but extinct now, or at least so perverted as to be worthless. So now we have thousands of generic NGs covering almost as many topics as there are ideas, perverse or otherwise. Some are worthwhile, but some are little more than an exercise in the arcane mindlessness of the illogical. And any of them can be corrupted by the same idiocy that corrupted the early iterations. Endless posting of the same inane message--as we saw earlier this week here--is an example of how a NG might be rendered useless. Posting BS under other's names is another. It's doubtful a netcop can do much to stop the idiots. They are persistent, as we've seen demonstrated by you. Get them kicked off a news server and they'll be back in a day or so with a vengeance and a new ISP. Like flies you can swat them all day, but they'll still be buzzing around your head at day's end. So the netcop concept is an exercise in futility. But it isn't necessarily wrong. Free speech has responsibilities and obligations. If I stand on a street corner in your hometown with a bullhorn and proclaim for all to hear that Neal Warren molests children every night on his boat and may be a murderer, you'll probably sue me. If I anchor my boat next to yours and scream in the bullhorn all hours of the night between 11pm and 7am, you'll have me arrested. A true conservative understands that free speech is not an isolated concept, rather a guaranteed right with all the attendant responsibility and accountability that a functional, orderly society demands. You're a juvenile whiner, Neal. You're no conservative. You may be a redneck and a bigot, but you're not a conservative. A real conservative would never question his responsibilities to his fellow citizens. You simply don't give a **** about responsibilities to anyone beyond yourself. Max |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message Please consider again my post titled, "Demonstrably Stupid". The above misguided folks define the term. They take a public stand against freedom of speech. Neither you nor Lady Pile It have responded to my queries: 1) is it free speech to attribute to others that which you've said yourself, especially when such attribution may injure the party to whom it is attributed? 2) is anything anyone chooses to say protected under the auspices of the First Amendment? (ie--can one yell "FIRE!" in a crowded venue?), and 3) shouldn't illegal or illegitimate actions have consequences (a fundamental conservative value)? The concept of the netcop is nothing new. But it is a popular urban myth that netcops are necessarily wrong or bad. Usenet started out many years ago as a means of communication between engineers and scientists--a forum for esoteric exchange between peers, as it were. Slowly and insidiously it become corrupted by those who would use it for less enlightening purposes, such as the myriad newsgroups that clog Usenet today. The engineers and scientists attempted to put a halt to the nonsense and noise, but to no avail. Their original NGs are all but extinct now, or at least so perverted as to be worthless. So now we have thousands of generic NGs covering almost as many topics as there are ideas, perverse or otherwise. Some are worthwhile, but some are little more than an exercise in the arcane mindlessness of the illogical. And any of them can be corrupted by the same idiocy that corrupted the early iterations. Endless posting of the same inane message--as we saw earlier this week here--is an example of how a NG might be rendered useless. Posting BS under other's names is another. It's doubtful a netcop can do much to stop the idiots. They are persistent, as we've seen demonstrated by you. Get them kicked off a news server and they'll be back in a day or so with a vengeance and a new ISP. Like flies you can swat them all day, but they'll still be buzzing around your head at day's end. So the netcop concept is an exercise in futility. But it isn't necessarily wrong. Free speech has responsibilities and obligations. If I stand on a street corner in your hometown with a bullhorn and proclaim for all to hear that Neal Warren molests children every night on his boat and may be a murderer, you'll probably sue me. If I anchor my boat next to yours and scream in the bullhorn all hours of the night between 11pm and 7am, you'll have me arrested. A true conservative understands that free speech is not an isolated concept, rather a guaranteed right with all the attendant responsibility and accountability that a functional, orderly society demands. You're a juvenile whiner, Neal. You're no conservative. You may be a redneck and a bigot, but you're not a conservative. A real conservative would never question his responsibilities to his fellow citizens. You simply don't give a **** about responsibilities to anyone beyond yourself. Max |
"Maxprop" wrote : Ever hear the expression, "Shrimp should not be kept in the cedar bucket in which one ****s."? Probably not--I just made it up. Awarded to katy sluts boyfriend, Max. An eye doctor that can't see! Whats up with that? LP |
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... CN, Go post another three or four hundred "Tee Hee" and cool off. Those posts weren't from Capt. Neal, you stupid neandethal! Then maybe you can come down to REALITY. Chill out. Why don't you think about sobering up, you ignorant drunk! Go see LP and clean your pipes out and rejoin the human race See Ya, Ole Thom Why don't you go see a psychologist about your transvestite girlfriend? Seems to me that you would prefer having sex with the opposite sex, you queer ass Ganz homosexual! LP |
"Maxprop" wrote: Neither you nor Lady Pile It have responded to my queries: Like anyone would give a **** what lies you posted... Get a grip, you worthless maxlessprop. Everyone in this group know that you are screwing katysails with her husband's permission. I don't approve, but the katy lover supporters are all behind you on this...they are just waiting to get their manhood is the professed lose woman of asa. LP |
"Maxprop" blathered in message hlink.net... Neither you nor Lady Pile It have responded to my queries: 1) is it free speech to attribute to others that which you've said yourself, especially when such attribution may injure the party to whom it is attributed? 2) is anything anyone chooses to say protected under the auspices of the First Amendment? (ie--can one yell "FIRE!" in a crowded venue?), and 3) shouldn't illegal or illegitimate actions have consequences (a fundamental conservative value)? The concept of the netcop is nothing new. But it is a popular urban myth that netcops are necessarily wrong or bad. Usenet started out many years ago as a means of communication between engineers and scientists--a forum for esoteric exchange between peers, as it were. Slowly and insidiously it become corrupted by those who would use it for less enlightening purposes, such as the myriad newsgroups that clog Usenet today. The engineers and scientists attempted to put a halt to the nonsense and noise, but to no avail. Their original NGs are all but extinct now, or at least so perverted as to be worthless. So now we have thousands of generic NGs covering almost as many topics as there are ideas, perverse or otherwise. Some are worthwhile, but some are little more than an exercise in the arcane mindlessness of the illogical. And any of them can be corrupted by the same idiocy that corrupted the early iterations. Endless posting of the same inane message--as we saw earlier this week here--is an example of how a NG might be rendered useless. Posting BS under other's names is another. It's doubtful a netcop can do much to stop the idiots. They are persistent, as we've seen demonstrated by you. Get them kicked off a news server and they'll be back in a day or so with a vengeance and a new ISP. Like flies you can swat them all day, but they'll still be buzzing around your head at day's end. So the netcop concept is an exercise in futility. But it isn't necessarily wrong. Free speech has responsibilities and obligations. If I stand on a street corner in your hometown with a bullhorn and proclaim for all to hear that Neal Warren molests children every night on his boat and may be a murderer, you'll probably sue me. If I anchor my boat next to yours and scream in the bullhorn all hours of the night between 11pm and 7am, you'll have me arrested. A true conservative understands that free speech is not an isolated concept, rather a guaranteed right with all the attendant responsibility and accountability that a functional, orderly society demands. You're a juvenile whiner, Neal. You're no conservative. You may be a redneck and a bigot, but you're not a conservative. A real conservative would never question his responsibilities to his fellow citizens. You simply don't give a **** about responsibilities to anyone beyond yourself. Max yawn! |
|
|
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... "Lady Pilot" wrote in message news:ZK54e.16934$TZ.401@okepread06... "Maxprop" wrote: Neither you nor Lady Pile It have responded to my queries: Like anyone would give a **** what lies you posted... Get a grip, you worthless maxlessprop. Everyone in this group know that you are screwing katysails with her husband's permission. I don't approve, but the katy lover supporters are all behind you on this...they are just waiting to get their manhood is the professed lose woman of asa. LP I've decided I like LP. I'm old and sometimes I get confused. I apologize! Ole Thom. Good man. Finally realizes his mistakes and is man enough to admit them. CN |
Thom, sorry, but you're posts are just not making it through. You probably
have some configuration problem. Have you done something recently? You should undo it whatever it was.. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... |
|
Maxprop wrote:
[...snip to the good part...] Usenet started out many years ago as a means of communication between engineers and scientists--a forum for esoteric exchange between peers, as it were. Slowly and insidiously it become corrupted by those who would use it for less enlightening purposes, such as the myriad newsgroups that clog Usenet today. You say this as if parody, commentary by ridicule, silliness, or theatrical play are unworthy of spoolspace. While I would encourage you to pursue the esoteric and enlightened discourse that you value, I reject the inferrence that other types of expression less worthy of spoolspace. -- ,,, ..oo c - Soque |
|
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... "Maxprop" wrote : Ever hear the expression, "Shrimp should not be kept in the cedar bucket in which one ****s."? Probably not--I just made it up. Awarded to katy sluts boyfriend, Max. An eye doctor that can't see! Whats up with that? LP Now, THAT's funny... Max can't see because his head is up his ass. I'll Drink to that! Old Thom You'd drink at an AAA meeting you old lush! But, at least your way of thinking is coming around . . . CN |
"JG" wrote in message ... Thom, sorry, but you're posts are just not making it through. You probably have some configuration problem. Have you done something recently? You should undo it whatever it was.. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Stupid netKKKop! CN "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... |
FLONKERS; UP YOURS
|
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: [...snip to the good part...] Usenet started out many years ago as a means of communication between engineers and scientists--a forum for esoteric exchange between peers, as it were. Slowly and insidiously it become corrupted by those who would use it for less enlightening purposes, such as the myriad newsgroups that clog Usenet today. You say this as if parody, commentary by ridicule, silliness, or theatrical play are unworthy of spoolspace. While I would encourage you to pursue the esoteric and enlightened discourse that you value, I reject the inferrence that other types of expression less worthy of spoolspace. -- .oo c - Soque Good name for a sock puppet - Soque. How do you enjoy my changing the subject line so it makes asa strong and foils you socks and wastes your time that you don't do anything contructive with in the first place. I have webTV which is hack proof and idiots like you can't do a thing about my screwing with you. Ole Thom was born at nite but not last nite . . . I'LL DRINK TO THAT! Ole Thom You're losing it. Bragging like that just makes you look silly - sorry sillier! CN |
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... FLONKERS; UP YOURS YOU ARE DIRT, SCUMBAGS, ASSHOLES, MOTHER RAPERS, FATHER RAPERS AND YOU PICK YOUR NOSES. YOU CAN'T TOUCH THIS DUMB OLD MAN WITH YOUR INFERIOR AND INEFFECTIVE ATTACKS. I INVITE YOU SO-CALLED HACKERS TO HACK MY WEBTV. YOU CAN'T DO IT, YOURE ALL TOO STUPID AND IGNORANT AND UGLY. GET A LIFE YOU MORONS. I HAVE YOU GROVELLING AT MY FEET. I'M OLD THOM AND I'M YOUR MASTER Watch out who you invite into your world, Ole Thom . . . CN |
Ol Thom knows how to throw down on yo ass ya Flonkers!
Respectfully. Joe |
Neal,
Even a Dumb Webber can change back. What is your next step, Netcops? I do detect a sign of Confusion in the GREATEST MAN ON THE PLANET! I haven't bragged nearly that much. Also, I've made no offensive moves against you and your "NEW FRIENDS" or the Snapper that called on them. They're of your choosing. If you and LP wind up dictating to the ASA GROUP I would rather loose my Webtv. |
Neal,
Your silly phony post are really "OLD HAT" The one that is most impressed with them is you. |
CN,
Are you speaking of inviting from personal experience:^) You are paying the price in your own freedom for the FLONKERS, aren't you my friend. I know you can't get rid of them. I'll try to help but remember I'm only a DUMB webber but we can give it a go if you're ready. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com