wrote in message

I'm not surprised to hear that you are as ignorant as Dan when it
comes to the colregs, NNeal.

See Bubba.... that's much better... no annoying facts... just vitriol and
assumption!
Being the newsgroup Idiot suits you too a "T".... you're a natural at it
Bubba!

Just please stay out of actual sailing related threads.... you have nothing
to contribute to the subject.

CM

wrote in message

Sure Neal, anything you say!

Good Boy Bubba!! ..... good boy!

CM

Capt. Mooron wrote:
wrote in message

I'm not surprised to hear that you are as ignorant as Dan when it
comes to the colregs, NNeal.

See Bubba.... that's much better... no annoying facts... just
vitriol and
assumption!


Typical BB style.


Being the newsgroup Idiot suits you too a "T".... you're a natural
at it


He was indeed born that way.


Bubba!

Just please stay out of actual sailing related threads.... you have
nothing
to contribute to the subject.


He has never contributed anything here. He's just a total asshole.
But I must admit he has set the standard of what a true asshole is.

Joe


CM

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:r3aOd.14517$K54.2604@edtnps84...

"JimH" wrote in message

Can someone explain how this boating thread is any better than the
worst
of the OT political threads often complained about by some here at
rec.boats?

Geez jimmy... it has to do with boats...
Are all you guys at rec.boats such whiners or is it that jimmy boy is
the
group weenie?

CM



*ploink* Another asshole joins Krause in the bozo bin.

Well done, JimH! I've been tempted to ploink Mooron for a long time.

Those of us who have no sense of humour at all need to be protected from
people like Mooron. Thank God for the killfile.

Like you, I didn't get a very good education -- so I'm not sure if I'm
allowed to killfile someone without making a public declaration.


Would it be very cowardly if I killfiled him without making it public?


Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:r3aOd.14517$K54.2604@edtnps84...

"JimH" wrote in message

Can someone explain how this boating thread is any better than the
worst
of the OT political threads often complained about by some here at
rec.boats?

Geez jimmy... it has to do with boats...
Are all you guys at rec.boats such whiners or is it that jimmy boy is
the
group weenie?

CM



*ploink* Another asshole joins Krause in the bozo bin.

Well done, JimH! I've been tempted to ploink Mooron for a long time.

Those of us who have no sense of humour at all need to be protected from
people like Mooron. Thank God for the killfile.

Like you, I didn't get a very good education -- so I'm not sure if I'm
allowed to killfile someone without making a public declaration.


Would it be very cowardly if I killfiled him without making it public?


Regards


Donal
--




I have done most of my killfiling privately...normally no need to make it
public....but with folks like Krause, Capt. Moron and Popeye the Sailor Man
(Binary Bill), sometimes it just feels better to announce it.

*Ploink*....*Plonk*....*Plink*....*Plunk*.....*Fiz z-Fizz*.......whatever way
you want to say it they are in my bozo bin and deserve each other.

wrote

I guess for some, ignorance is bliss, even if they have to work very
hard at it.

BBob

as opposed to you where it just comes naturally.

SV

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
I've defined proper until I'm blue in the face and you
idiots either can't read the definition or choose to not
read it and retain your usual ignorant bliss.

Rule 5, itself, defines what constitutes a proper lookout.
Read it again. Read it with comprehension. In case your
language skills are lacking, which seems to be the case,
allow me to re-state Rule 5 so you might understand how
Rule 5 defines 'proper'.


But your bosom buddy, Joe(backed up by Shen and otn), claims that it is not
necessary to keep a visual lookout.


Is he right, ... or is he wrong?



Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote
"Capt. Neal®" wrote
I've defined proper until I'm blue in the face and you
idiots either can't read the definition or choose to not
read it and retain your usual ignorant bliss.

Rule 5, itself, defines what constitutes a proper lookout.
Read it again. Read it with comprehension. In case your
language skills are lacking, which seems to be the case,
allow me to re-state Rule 5 so you might understand how
Rule 5 defines 'proper'.


But your bosom buddy, Joe(backed up by Shen and otn), claims that it is
not
necessary to keep a visual lookout.


Is he right, ... or is he wrong?

I read it. It says that if I look/listen and see boats all around me close
aboard then I need to maintain constant lookout. OTOH, if there is nothing
between me an the 20-mile horizon I can sack out for an hour or so. Right?

Vito wrote:
"Donal" wrote

"Capt. Neal®" wrote

But your bosom buddy, Joe(backed up by Shen and otn), claims that it is
not necessary to keep a visual lookout.

Is he right, ... or is he wrong?


I read it. It says that if I look/listen and see boats all around me close
aboard then I need to maintain constant lookout. OTOH, if there is nothing
between me an the 20-mile horizon I can sack out for an hour or so. Right?

How do you get a "20 mile horizon"?

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...
Vito wrote:
"Donal" wrote

"Capt. Neal®" wrote

But your bosom buddy, Joe(backed up by Shen and otn), claims that it is
not necessary to keep a visual lookout.

Is he right, ... or is he wrong?


I read it. It says that if I look/listen and see boats all around me
close
aboard then I need to maintain constant lookout. OTOH, if there is
nothing
between me an the 20-mile horizon I can sack out for an hour or so.
Right?

How do you get a "20 mile horizon"?

Climb the friggin' mast..... like I do!

CM