Dear Group,

It seems to me that the real result of the Bush victory
is a further entrenchment of irrational leftist thought
ala the likes of DSK concerning current affairs.

Rather than reconsider their views that certainly are
way out in left field and have been soundly rejected
by the majority of God fearing Americans, these liberals
demonstrate their arrogance and failure to learn by
expecting the majority who rejected their thinking to
compromise toward the direction of the leftists.

Sorry, but that's not the way the world works.

Thinking this way is clearly irrational. When people
have their political and social views and agenda
soundly rejected by the majority, it behooves them
to moderate their extreme views and move more
toward the views of the majority. The more those
with a defeated political agenda complain and whine
and refuse to accept reality, the more they appear
to be bordering on the insane. This is fact. This
is sad fact.

Let me give you defeated leftist Democrats a little
advice. Move towards the center by admitting your
extreme views are not what the majority of the
American public can abide. The vote in the 2004
where Democrats lost big proves this to be a fact
as did the vote in 2002.

The more leftists continue to move even farther left
and the more leftists embrace extremism the more they
will have their hopes and dreams dashed. Why do
you liberals insist on shooting yourselves in the foot
time and time again. Are you incapable of learning?
Are you not able to consider that what you want is
not to be? What's good for America is bad for you.
What's good for you is bad for America. That's
the position you have put yourselves in. Stupid!

It is all the more pathetic to see some people in this
group who claim to be sailors espousing the liberal
philosophy just a stridently now as before the election
they lost by such a large margin. Sailors must accept
reality to be successful at sailing. You liberals can't
possible be successful sailors because you are in
a constant state of denial. You deny the obvious.
You deny the fact that your ideas are so far out
of the mainstream that your ideas are rejected
outright.

It is tantamount to sailing in a full gale and trying to
tell your crew that you are becalmed. Or racing a
J/27 in a J/24 fleet and expecting the fleet to accept
your unwanted presence with open arms. You're irrational
and you're dangerous to yourselves and to others.

Try therapy and try embracing reality. I can't speak
for others here, but I can speak for myself when I say
your constant irrational drivel makes me want to puke.

You are wasting your time and you are wasting your
lives. You are a pathetic bunch of incapable-of-learning,
bitter, nonsensical, flatulence laden losers.

Respectfully,
Capt. Neal
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What Bush and the conservatives understand is, to the extent that the
individual doesn't control the profits of his own work, he's a slave.

People with smaller tax burdens--free people--tend to be generous because
they can be. They employ other people to do the things they can't do
themselves, because they can.

On the other hand, the over-taxed--modern “slaves” to oversize government--
can't be generous, can't be innovative, can't stimulate employment, because
their pocket's already been picked by liberal politicians, and there's less
money for their individual American dream. It's the dreams of individuals
that built America. Big-government libs, leftist nuts, and marching
socialists never created anything in this country, except more despair.

Ironically, income tax cuts typically create greater revenue for the
government, not less, and that's also why Walmart, or Target, with low
prices, creates more millionaires among their investors than a Neiman-
Marcus could in a thousand years.

--------------------------------------
Pssst . . . the deficit's shrinking
By Lawrence Kudlow
January 16, 2005
http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/lkudlow.htm

Here's one story you won't find on tomorrow's front pages: "The U.S. budget
deficit is shrinking rapidly." The headline would be accurate, but the
mainstream media are much more interested in talking down this booming
economy than telling it like it is.

Last week's Treasury report on U.S. finances for December shows a year-to-
date fiscal 2005 deficit already $11 billion less than last year's. In the
first three months of the fiscal year that began last October, federal cash
outlays rose 6.1 percent and tax collections grew 10½ percent. When more
money comes in than goes out, the deficit shrinks.

At this pace, the 2005 deficit is on track to drop to $355 billion from
$413 billion in fiscal 2004. As a fraction of projected gross domestic
product, the new-year deficit will fall to 2.9 percent, compared with last
year's 3.6 percent.

Wire reports are loaded these days with accounts of an expanded trade gap
(driven mostly by slower exports to stagnant European and Japanese
economies, along with higher oil imports due to the energy price peak). But
not a report I can find mentions the sizable narrowing in U.S. fiscal
accounts.

Behind this really big budget story is the even-bigger story: The explosion
in tax revenues has been prompted by the tax-cut-led economic growth of the
last 18 months.

With 50 percent cash-bonus expensing for buying plant and equipment,
productivity-driven corporate profits ranging around 20 percent have
generated a 45 percent rise in business taxes. At lower income-tax rates,
employment gains of roughly 2½ million are throwing off more than 6 percent
in payroll-tax receipts. Personal tax revenues are rising by nearly 9
percent.

Meanwhile, in the wake of strong stock market advances over the last two
years, non-withheld revenues from individuals - including investor
dividends and capital gains now taxed at only 15 percent - have jumped more
than 14 percent.

Following the Clinton cap-gains tax cut and savings expansion bill of 1997,
investment-related tax collections led to bull-market budget surpluses in
the pre-September 11 period of 1997-2001. However, despite the flood of new
revenues, this year's federal budget is still overspending. Domestic
spending on nonentitlement programs (excluding homeland defense) is rising
by 4.1 percent. That's more than twice the pace of core inflation. But this
may be changing.

According to The Washington Post's reporter Jonathan Weisman, the Bush
budget totals planned for fiscal 2006 may be essentially unchanged from the
totals for fiscal 2005 (excluding defense and homeland security). Mr.
Weisman wrote the administration's first really tough budget request (due
out next month) "would freeze most spending on agriculture, veterans and
science, slash or eliminate dozens of federal programs, and force more
costs, from Medicaid to housing, onto state and local governments."

The rapid growth of federal health care and other entitlements would also
slow markedly. Though the numbers are still unavailable, this sounds a bit
like Ronald Reagan's tax-cutting budget of 1981. In addition to reducing
the top personal tax rate to 50 percent from 70 percent, the Gipper
proposed budget cuts worth nearly $100 billion in today's dollars.

Of course, the political screaming over the forthcoming budget has already
begun. A passel of Democrats and at least one Republican, Wyoming Sen.
Craig Thomas, have sent a protest letter to Josh Bolten, director of the
Office of Management and Budget. Former Gov. John Engler of Michigan, a
Republican and current president of the National Association of
Manufacturers, has pledged to fight the elimination of various
protectionist subsidies to his member firms.

However, Judd Gregg, New Hampshire Republican and chairman of the Senate
Budget Committee and a long-time Bush ally, is set to support the
administration's new budget discipline. This includes, by the way, Mr.
Bush's plan to reduce Social Security benefits by replacing wage indexing
with a price-level formula and extending the retirement age - one or the
other, or both - in return for personal saving accounts.

By the way, Treasury Secretary John Snow just completed a Wall Street tour
where leading bond traders told him not to sweat the transitional costs for
personal accounts. The traders said an additional $100 billion a year over
the next decade for transitional financing will be easily manageable. "A
rounding error," one senior trader told Mr. Snow.

A supply-side tax-reform movement, a shrinking budget deficit, new-found
spending discipline, and a determination to confound conventional wisdom by
reforming Social Security has George W. Bush's second term off to a roaring
start - even before he is officially sworn in.


Capt. Neal® wrote:

Dear Group,

It seems to me that the real result of the Bush victory
is a further entrenchment of irrational leftist thought
ala the likes of DSK concerning current affairs.

Rather than reconsider their views that certainly are
way out in left field and have been soundly rejected
by the majority of God fearing Americans, these liberals
demonstrate their arrogance and failure to learn by
expecting the majority who rejected their thinking to
compromise toward the direction of the leftists.

Sorry, but that's not the way the world works.

Thinking this way is clearly irrational. When people
have their political and social views and agenda
soundly rejected by the majority, it behooves them
to moderate their extreme views and move more
toward the views of the majority. The more those
with a defeated political agenda complain and whine
and refuse to accept reality, the more they appear
to be bordering on the insane. This is fact. This
is sad fact.

Let me give you defeated leftist Democrats a little
advice. Move towards the center by admitting your
extreme views are not what the majority of the
American public can abide. The vote in the 2004
where Democrats lost big proves this to be a fact
as did the vote in 2002.

The more leftists continue to move even farther left
and the more leftists embrace extremism the more they
will have their hopes and dreams dashed. Why do
you liberals insist on shooting yourselves in the foot
time and time again. Are you incapable of learning?
Are you not able to consider that what you want is
not to be? What's good for America is bad for you.
What's good for you is bad for America. That's
the position you have put yourselves in. Stupid!

It is all the more pathetic to see some people in this
group who claim to be sailors espousing the liberal
philosophy just a stridently now as before the election
they lost by such a large margin. Sailors must accept
reality to be successful at sailing. You liberals can't
possible be successful sailors because you are in
a constant state of denial. You deny the obvious.
You deny the fact that your ideas are so far out
of the mainstream that your ideas are rejected
outright.

It is tantamount to sailing in a full gale and trying to
tell your crew that you are becalmed. Or racing a
J/27 in a J/24 fleet and expecting the fleet to accept
your unwanted presence with open arms. You're irrational
and you're dangerous to yourselves and to others.

Try therapy and try embracing reality. I can't speak
for others here, but I can speak for myself when I say
your constant irrational drivel makes me want to puke.

You are wasting your time and you are wasting your
lives. You are a pathetic bunch of incapable-of-learning,
bitter, nonsensical, flatulence laden losers.

Respectfully,
Capt. Neal
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...i?ArtNum=81590



"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
Dear Group,

It seems to me that the real result of the Bush victory
is a further entrenchment of irrational leftist thought
ala the likes of DSK concerning current affairs.

Rather than reconsider their views that certainly are
way out in left field and have been soundly rejected
by the majority of God fearing Americans, these liberals
demonstrate their arrogance and failure to learn by
expecting the majority who rejected their thinking to
compromise toward the direction of the leftists.

Sorry, but that's not the way the world works.

Thinking this way is clearly irrational. When people
have their political and social views and agenda
soundly rejected by the majority, it behooves them
to moderate their extreme views and move more
toward the views of the majority. The more those
with a defeated political agenda complain and whine
and refuse to accept reality, the more they appear
to be bordering on the insane. This is fact. This
is sad fact.

Let me give you defeated leftist Democrats a little
advice. Move towards the center by admitting your
extreme views are not what the majority of the
American public can abide. The vote in the 2004
where Democrats lost big proves this to be a fact
as did the vote in 2002.

The more leftists continue to move even farther left
and the more leftists embrace extremism the more they
will have their hopes and dreams dashed. Why do
you liberals insist on shooting yourselves in the foot
time and time again. Are you incapable of learning?
Are you not able to consider that what you want is
not to be? What's good for America is bad for you.
What's good for you is bad for America. That's
the position you have put yourselves in. Stupid!

It is all the more pathetic to see some people in this
group who claim to be sailors espousing the liberal
philosophy just a stridently now as before the election
they lost by such a large margin. Sailors must accept
reality to be successful at sailing. You liberals can't
possible be successful sailors because you are in
a constant state of denial. You deny the obvious.
You deny the fact that your ideas are so far out
of the mainstream that your ideas are rejected
outright.

It is tantamount to sailing in a full gale and trying to
tell your crew that you are becalmed. Or racing a
J/27 in a J/24 fleet and expecting the fleet to accept
your unwanted presence with open arms. You're irrational
and you're dangerous to yourselves and to others.

Try therapy and try embracing reality. I can't speak
for others here, but I can speak for myself when I say
your constant irrational drivel makes me want to puke.

You are wasting your time and you are wasting your
lives. You are a pathetic bunch of incapable-of-learning,
bitter, nonsensical, flatulence laden losers.

Respectfully,
Capt. Neal
~~~~~~~~~~~~~