Jetcap wrote:
Joe wrote:

Why should they cry to High Heaven?

Because, while the Canadians have every right and authority to
stipulate
who may step ashore on Canadian soil they have no right by treaty or
other law to control who may serve aboard an American flag vessel.

They do if the said vessel unloads anything or tie to any Canada dock.

First thing I was tought at a young seaman is when your in a forien
land you are held to thier laws.

We should just ban any American ferries from landing in Canada or from
coming from Canada and kill off all money they make from our ships,
that will change thier tune in a heartbeat. Still they have a right to
make laws that apply to landing in Canada.

Just like we do not allow terrorist types on any ship that docks here
in America. We now check the crew manifest of every ship that unloads
anything

So the smart thing to do now if you want to hit the dock or landing in
Canaduh is to not get a DWI.

Joe



There are a couple of centuries of legal and military precedent to
support the right of American seaman to pursue their trade aboard
American flag vessels without interference from any foreign
government.

If the USCG allows a seaman to hold a document and perform the duties
of
a crewmember aboard an American flag vessel under the authority of
that
document no foreign government has any right to amend that authority.
We
have fought wars to defend the rights of American seamen to pursue
their
trade.

Don't be in such a hurry to trash your own rights and our nation's
sovereignty.

Rick

Joe wrote:

They do if the said vessel unloads anything or tie to any Canada dock.
You are sadly misinformed about the laws that protect you as a seaman.
The port state may restrict a seaman from leaving the vessel but has
absolutely no say in who may sail aboard the vessel of another flag state.

The flag on a ship means something, just as it does on an embassy building.

First thing I was tought at a young seaman is when your in a forien
land you are held to thier laws.

Yes, Joe, and you should remember that to go ashore in a foreign country
you must hold a "shore pass" issued by the immigration agency of that
country. If that country chooses not to issue a pass the seaman must
remain aboard the vessel. That country, however, has no authority
whatsoever to say who may or may not serve aboard that vessel.

We should just ban any American ferries from landing in Canada or from
coming from Canada and kill off all money they make from our ships,
that will change thier tune in a heartbeat. Still they have a right to
make laws that apply to landing in Canada.

Yes, Joe, they can make all the laws they want about who can land. They
cannot make any law saying who can work on an American ship. The US Navy
was founded to stop that sort of thinking.

Just like we do not allow terrorist types on any ship that docks here
in America. We now check the crew manifest of every ship that unloads
anything

We have no authority to allow or disallow anyone to sail aboard a
foreign flag vessel. We may arrest them if they are fugitives wanted by
this or another country with whom we have a treaty that allows such
arrests, or we may prohibit them from leaving the vessel while it is
alongside. We have no right under international law to say who can or
cannot sail aboard the ship. We check the manifests to see what the
cargo is, we check the crew list to see if there is anyone aboard who is
"wanted" or who does not meet our standards to be granted shore leave.
If they are not otherwise eligible for permission to visit the US they
can't leave the ship in the US but we have no authority to deny them
employment on their ship.

You really need to take a high school social studies course and learn
something about history and the rights that a lot of Americans died to
defend. You seem awfully casual about trashing your own rights ...

Rick

You seem to miss the fact that the ferries you were talking about must
use offloading equipment in Canada. So it is a partership operation,
half American half Canaduh. Therefore they have the right to put
restriction on who is qualified to do the job.

Most American shipping companies ask you if you have been conivicted
of a DWI or any chrime and they have the right to not hire you.

IMO anyone who has had a recent DWI should not be allowed on any
commerical vessel.

And we can turn away any vessel we think could be a security risk.
Several have been told they can not dock in Houston.

I'm not saying we have a right to tell any country who should serve on
a vessel, but we do have the right to tell the vessel to leave or deny
them entry all together.

Same as Canada, If they do not want drunks sailing in Canadian waters
than that is their right.

Perhaps they see it as a safety issue. Some of the vessels I worked on
would throw you off if you had a perferated ear drum.
IMO Canada is within it's rights.

Joe

Joe wrote:
You seem to miss the fact that the ferries you were talking about must
use offloading equipment in Canada.
??? Have you ever been around a RoRo vessel?

So it is a partership operation,
half American half Canaduh. Therefore they have the right to put
restriction on who is qualified to do the job.

Sorry, Joe ... you are obviously out of your depth here.

Most American shipping companies ask you if you have been conivicted
of a DWI or any chrime and they have the right to not hire you.

How long has it been since you sailed on an inspected vessel? Have you
ever heard of the USCG, STCW, MMD's and how the industry works since 1945?

IMO anyone who has had a recent DWI should not be allowed on any
commerical vessel.

Fortunately your opinion isn't worth much in international law and
maritime treaties.

Perhaps they see it as a safety issue.

The USCG sets safety standards on US flagged vessels. USCG standards
meet international standards agreed upon by Canada. They have no
authority to "see" things any other way. If they choose to refuse
permission for the ship to enter Canadian waters that is one thing, but
to deny employment aboard that ship to an American citizen seaman who
otherwise meets all US standards and is certificated by the USCG is
breaking international law.

You may not like the law but the law is based on a few hundred years of
maritime heritage and more than a few wars.

Some of the vessels I worked on
would throw you off if you had a perferated ear drum.

There was obviously no other restriction on holes in ones head.

Rick

Jetcap wrote:
Joe wrote:
You seem to miss the fact that the ferries you were talking about
must
use offloading equipment in Canada.
??? Have you ever been around a RoRo vessel?

yes.


So it is a partership operation,
half American half Canaduh. Therefore they have the right to put
restriction on who is qualified to do the job.

Sorry, Joe ... you are obviously out of your depth here.

So your saying Canada has no investment in a Roro landing, and mo part
of the operation?

Most American shipping companies ask you if you have been
conivicted
of a DWI or any chrime and they have the right to not hire you.

How long has it been since you sailed on an inspected vessel?

1996


Have you
ever heard of the USCG, STCW, MMD's and how the industry works since
1945?

Yes


IMO anyone who has had a recent DWI should not be allowed on any
commerical vessel.

Fortunately your opinion isn't worth much in international law and
maritime treaties.

Perhaps so. But if a man can not keep himself safe and in control of a
small car, why should we trust him around machinery that makes cars
look like fleas, Lets protect the lives of others.

I'm a for sailors getting as drunk or as stoned as they want to, but
not drink and drive, or sail if they can not handle whatever the drug
is they choose to use. Act like a man and be accountable for all your
actions good and bad.




Perhaps they see it as a safety issue.

The USCG sets safety standards on US flagged vessels. USCG standards
meet international standards agreed upon by Canada. They have no
authority to "see" things any other way. If they choose to refuse
permission for the ship to enter Canadian waters that is one thing,
but
to deny employment aboard that ship to an American citizen seaman who

otherwise meets all US standards and is certificated by the USCG is
breaking international law.


uhh if he has a prior DUI conviction the American citizen can not go to
Canada, much less get a job on a Canook ship.


You may not like the law but the law is based on a few hundred years
of
maritime heritage and more than a few wars.


You were Union right? Sheeeze no wonder..


Some of the vessels I worked on
would throw you off if you had a perferated ear drum.

There was obviously no other restriction on holes in ones head.


Should there be?

Joe

Rick