| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes I did..... and had to use hot sauce to eat that particular crow... but
that was not the point was it.... the point was that a greater load could be handled by support at the end of the boom... and if you looked at all the really big cranes this was indeed the case. Seems you skipped out on eating your portion of crow... as usual. Don't fret Doug.... one day you'll be confident enough to admit when you are wrong and finally be able to achieve the pinnacle of arrogance..... like I have! :-D CM "DSK" wrote in message You never did take a look at the cranes & ift booms supported at 25% or less of their length, though. Since that thread, I've been looking around, and it's amazingly common. DSK |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Puts Lake Superior to shame | ASA | |||
| The Shame of Bush | ASA | |||
| OT Beyond shame | General | |||