|
Pic for Neal
Here ya go....
Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a thing as too sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made for a stunning 8X10 borderless print. Capt RB |
Nice crop on the head Bob... real professional!
CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Here ya go.... Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a thing as too sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made for a stunning 8X10 borderless print. Capt RB |
Did he fix the red-eye this time?
Scotty "Overproof" wrote in message news:HjCvd.77059$6f6.5340@edtnps89... Nice crop on the head Bob... real professional! CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Here ya go.... Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a thing as too sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made for a stunning 8X10 borderless print. Capt RB |
Nice crop on the head Bob... real professional!
The fully cropped print his eyes, nose and mouth only. A classic ECU portrait show. Quite an imagination you have there, Mooron! RB |
Nice detail in that pic.
I can even tell by the poor little blighter's lips that he's bottle fed. Breast fed babies don't have that slightly stretched upper lip. CN "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Here ya go.... Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a thing as too sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made for a stunning 8X10 borderless print. Capt RB |
Nice detail in that pic.
I can even tell by the poor little blighter's lips that he's bottle fed. Yup, we give him a bottle of breast milk once a day, usually his last feeding before bed at 7:30. If you think that pic has detail, you should see the original RAW version. RB |
Tiff format? CN "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Nice detail in that pic. I can even tell by the poor little blighter's lips that he's bottle fed. Yup, we give him a bottle of breast milk once a day, usually his last feeding before bed at 7:30. If you think that pic has detail, you should see the original RAW version. RB |
Get that runt Baptized ASAP!
Jesus commands thee! Amen! Bob Crantz "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Here ya go.... Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a thing as too sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made for a stunning 8X10 borderless print. Capt RB |
Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I told
him about.... CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Did he fix the red-eye this time? Scotty "Overproof" wrote in message news:HjCvd.77059$6f6.5340@edtnps89... Nice crop on the head Bob... real professional! CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Here ya go.... Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a thing as too sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made for a stunning 8X10 borderless print. Capt RB |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Nice crop on the head Bob... real professional! The fully cropped print his eyes, nose and mouth only. A classic ECU portrait show. Quite an imagination you have there, Mooron! What a complete Dufus you are Bob.... Bwahahahahahahaa!! CM |
That is BLASPHEMY!
Amen! Bob Crantz wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:11:58 GMT, "Bob Crantz" wrote: http://www.wordupmoney.com/jesushome.html AMEN! BB |
Bob Crantz wrote:
That is BLASPHEMY! Amen! Yes it is. Do you think God has a sense of humor? DSK |
It says so in the Bible!
Amen! http://www.thebaptistpage.com/Readin...michael_02.htm Bob Crantz "DSK" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: That is BLASPHEMY! Amen! Yes it is. Do you think God has a sense of humor? DSK |
Tiff format?
CN No, tiff still loses info and includes white balance and other data. With RAW you set the WB after you shoot. RB |
Overproof wrote:
Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I told him about.... Photoshop? (' CM "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... Did he fix the red-eye this time? Scotty "Overproof" wrote in message news:HjCvd.77059$6f6.5340@edtnps89... Nice crop on the head Bob... real professional! CM "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Here ya go.... Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. I get sharper results from the 50mm prime, but there's such a thing as too sharp with pics like this. From my R300M photo printer, this made for a stunning 8X10 borderless print. Capt RB |
Quite an imagination you have there, Mooron!
What a complete Dufus you are Bob.... Bwahahahahahahaa!! Guess you never saw the work of Any Warhole or any of the Picasso Dark Mirror collection of photos. I really can't help your ignorance on this one mooron. You probably also think there are "rules" for centering subjects, then again you probably never saw Cityscapes exhibit either. Forget the rake...someone get a rice picker! RB |
I'm not sure if he thinks so, but I'm sure he hopes so!
Scout "DSK" wrote Do you think God has a sense of humor? |
"Bell" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I told him about.... Photoshop? (' Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette let alone pixel edit and masks. I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the shots for him.... ;-D CM |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message Guess you never saw the work of Any Warhole or any of the Picasso Dark Mirror collection of photos. I really can't help your ignorance on this one mooron. You probably also think there are "rules" for centering subjects, then again you probably never saw Cityscapes exhibit either. Forget the rake...someone get a rice picker! Ha Ha Ha.... dear me... Bob walks through a gallery and suddenly is transformed into an expert in the Art once more. You're a really funny guy Bob..... CM |
Overproof wrote:
"Bell" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I told him about.... Photoshop? (' Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette let alone pixel edit and masks. I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the shots for him.... ;-D CM Photoshop (you *know* bs has to have the most expensive) has an auto "red-eye remover". Just point and click. Or maybe Suzy (or Thomas) did the edit for him? |
Bobsprit wrote:
Quite an imagination you have there, Mooron! What a complete Dufus you are Bob.... Bwahahahahahahaa!! Guess you never saw the work of Any Warhole Careful, the gaynzed one is lurking. You know he can't resist the word. or any of the Picasso Dark Mirror collection of photos. I really can't help your ignorance on this one mooron. You probably also think there are "rules" for centering subjects, then again you probably never saw Cityscapes exhibit either. Forget the rake...someone get a rice picker! RB |
"Bell" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: "Bell" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I told him about.... Photoshop? (' Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette let alone pixel edit and masks. I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the shots for him.... ;-D CM Photoshop (you *know* bs has to have the most expensive) has an auto "red-eye remover". Just point and click. Or maybe Suzy (or Thomas) did the edit for him? They generally give you a free copy w/purchase of camera, part of the software bundle. John Cairns |
John Cairns wrote:
"Bell" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: "Bell" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I told him about.... Photoshop? (' Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette let alone pixel edit and masks. I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the shots for him.... ;-D CM Photoshop (you *know* bs has to have the most expensive) has an auto "red-eye remover". Just point and click. Or maybe Suzy (or Thomas) did the edit for him? They generally give you a free copy w/purchase of camera, part of the software bundle. John Cairns FREE?? Not for the BS! He'd never do FREE. Maybe he suckered someone out of it (or got it in their will?) |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Here ya go.... Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. Bob, You will cause permanent damage to the young lad's eyesight if you take too many photos like that. From the dilation of his pupils, it is evident that he was in relative darkness before you exposed him to the flash! In future think about the poor baby. Turn up the lights before using the flashgun on him. The reason that he cried after you took the photo is because his eyes were in pain. Regards Donal -- |
Have you noticed how the lad's face is quite asymmetrical? Draw a straight line from top to bottom centered on his little nose and his mouth is way off to the side. The doc who delivered him should have taken a little more time molding his head into some semblance of evenness. CN "Donal" wrote in message ... "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Here ya go.... Nikon D70, at 60mm, 1/125th, F/16, hard flash only. RAW downconverted. http://members.aol.com/bobsprit/images/boobaby22.jpg. Bob, You will cause permanent damage to the young lad's eyesight if you take too many photos like that. From the dilation of his pupils, it is evident that he was in relative darkness before you exposed him to the flash! In future think about the poor baby. Turn up the lights before using the flashgun on him. The reason that he cried after you took the photo is because his eyes were in pain. Regards Donal -- |
Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette
let alone pixel edit and masks. I use Photoshop CS (full version) of course along with Nikon-View to decode raw images. Neat Image is used to correct higher ISOs. Mooron blows it again! RB |
wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:25:04 GMT, "John Cairns" wrote: "Bell" wrote in message . .. Overproof wrote: "Bell" wrote in message ... Overproof wrote: Thank Gawd No Red Eye this time.... He probably used the technique I told him about.... Photoshop? (' Photoshop.... Bob..... don't be silly... he couldn't figure out a palette let alone pixel edit and masks. I told him to have someone who had a clue about photography take the shots for him.... ;-D CM Photoshop (you *know* bs has to have the most expensive) has an auto "red-eye remover". Just point and click. Or maybe Suzy (or Thomas) did the edit for him? They generally give you a free copy w/purchase of camera, part of the software bundle. John Cairns A free copy of photoshop? I SERIOUSLY doubt it's the full version. Meanwhile, automated redeye repair does not do a very good job except for "snapshot" quality. In a closeup portrait, it would be VERY noticable. Figures that Moron would think that Photoshop's redeye presets would do more than a very crude job. BB I have several copies of PhotoShop, including a full version, along with Corel PhotoPaint, full version, couldn't tell you if any of the bundled versions are complete as I rarely use them, I take perfect pics right out of the box :) John Cairns |
You will cause permanent damage to the young lad's eyesight if you take too
many photos like that. Ahhh...another expert!!! 1) the flash is not pointed at him. It's wireless and out of his eyeline. 2) The room is bright (200 watts overhead), but he just had his eyes closed. The D70 is so damn fast, I got him just as he spotted the lens of the camera. RB |
Draw a straight line from top to bottom centered on his little
nose and his mouth is way off to the side. He's 15 weeks old. Head molding doesn't completely go away for 6-9 months. Face it. He's damn cute! RB |
I gotta admit it. He's one adorable kid.
CN "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Draw a straight line from top to bottom centered on his little nose and his mouth is way off to the side. He's 15 weeks old. Head molding doesn't completely go away for 6-9 months. Face it. He's damn cute! RB |
I gotta admit it. He's one adorable kid.
I gotta admit it. Suzanne's genes must have marched mine into an oven. He's also well ahead of every developmental curve. The best part is that he SLEEPS at night! RB |
I'm happy for you that you have such a perfect baby.
I can see why you are such a proud parent. But try not to tempt fate by bragging on him too much. The Lord works in mysterious ways . . . CN "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... I gotta admit it. He's one adorable kid. I gotta admit it. Suzanne's genes must have marched mine into an oven. He's also well ahead of every developmental curve. The best part is that he SLEEPS at night! RB |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... Or maybe Suzy (or Thomas) did the edit for him? They generally give you a free copy w/purchase of camera, part of the software bundle. Not full photoshop. Usually just Elements, which is now up to 3.0. Good program that's fine for most folks. Have you tried The Gimp? www.gimp.org Regards Donal -- |
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... You will cause permanent damage to the young lad's eyesight if you take too many photos like that. Ahhh...another expert!!! 1) the flash is not pointed at him. It's wireless and out of his eyeline. 2) The room is bright (200 watts overhead), but he just had his eyes closed. So you woke the poor little mite up? If he was awake before you took the shot, and there was a 200W light in operation, then his pupils would not have been so dilated. The D70 is so damn fast, I got him just as he spotted the lens of the camera. Sorry, Bob. That's not quite true. Admit it ... the flash made him cry, didn't it? BTW, he's got a very cute nose. It looks like there might be a bit of African heritage in his bloodline. Regards Donal -- |
and there was a 200W light in
operation, then his pupils would not have been so dilated. Listen, doctor eyeball, babie's eyes are quite slow to react, not like an adult's eyes at all. He squeals and laughs when I take pics, because he likes the flashes. Like any baby, if something bugs him, he lets us know fast. RB |
But try not to tempt fate by bragging on him too much.
The Lord works in mysterious ways . . . I'm really not bragging...just kidding about it because it upsets Scotty Potti and Mooron. You can't fault me for that. RB |
HA! Lots of people much older than Thomas like to watch the little blue
light of a welder. They know it isn't good for their eyes, but they can't help it. Donal's correct (did I type that?), you could be ruining his eyes whether Thomas likes it or not. Bobsprit wrote: and there was a 200W light in operation, then his pupils would not have been so dilated. Listen, doctor eyeball, babie's eyes are quite slow to react, not like an adult's eyes at all. He squeals and laughs when I take pics, because he likes the flashes. Like any baby, if something bugs him, he lets us know fast. RB |
HA! Lots of people much older than Thomas like to watch the little blue
light of a welder. Don't be silly. There is no way Suzanne is going to stop her welding with little Thomas in the same room. RB |
http://www.nevdgp.org.au/geninf/std_...NOBLASTOMA.htm
"Bobsprit" wrote in message ... and there was a 200W light in operation, then his pupils would not have been so dilated. Listen, doctor eyeball, babie's eyes are quite slow to react, not like an adult's eyes at all. He squeals and laughs when I take pics, because he likes the flashes. Like any baby, if something bugs him, he lets us know fast. RB |
HP says minimize flash:
http://h41157.www4.hp.com/uk/en/digi...04/babies.html "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... and there was a 200W light in operation, then his pupils would not have been so dilated. Listen, doctor eyeball, babie's eyes are quite slow to react, not like an adult's eyes at all. He squeals and laughs when I take pics, because he likes the flashes. Like any baby, if something bugs him, he lets us know fast. RB |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com