Thanks to otn for showing me Nav's response to my last.
First off, the question regarding the dayshape on a partially submerged object
less than 200m in length.
Go back and read the question, Nav, YOU are concentrating on the dayshape for a
towing vessel. The question asks about the towed vessel/object. Again, read
rule 24 (g)(iv). Answer is B.

As for a fishing vessel being RAM.
First off, Nav, I don't squirm, so shove your attitude up your ass.
If you had read and understood my statements, you would know that I said the
fishing vessel "could" be a possibility because in truth, a fishing vessel when
engaged in fishing with nets, trawls IS considered to be a vessel with
"restricted maneuverability" Rule 3 (d).
The fact that this does not fall into your ordered understanding of the words
contained in the rules for RAM vessels, does not change this fact.
If you go back to my answer, you will note that for the question, I stated
"minesweeper" as the correct answer with the "could" additive. This is not an
error on my part, but instead, a further note as to the real world
possibilities.
My appologies, if you are incapable of understanding this.
G BTW Considering some of your responses, I'd say you need a refresher
course.

Shen

PS ....and before you say it, I take a constant refresher and update course on
this subject