Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
I think ya got that one backwards. The Moors overran Spain in the early 700s and battled Charlemagne's grandfather at Tours in 732. By the time the Carolingian Renaissance was under way, Charlemagne was fighting them south of the Pyrenees. The Crusades didn't start until more than three hundred years later, when Pope Urban cried out against the infidel, a classic political red herring, and the crowd roared "Deus Le Volt" (trans: the batteries in my Walkman are dead) Thanks Doug, my knowledge of history in that area leaves something to be desired. Cheers Marty |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Baxter wrote:
Thanks Doug, my knowledge of history in that area leaves something to be desired. Mine too... one of my goals in learning Spanish is to read about some of the history involved. Regards Doug King |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
Martin Baxter wrote: Thanks Doug, my knowledge of history in that area leaves something to be desired. Mine too... one of my goals in learning Spanish is to read about some of the history involved. Regards Doug King Did a bit of reading last night, turns out the Crusades analogy is not so bad. The first Crusade was relatively successful, the objective was reached ('liberating' Jerusalem). The Second Crusade captured some more land, and shamelessly sacked Constantinople along the way. The last three Crusades were pretty much a bust and in the long run most of the territory fell back to the Saracens. The one great legacy of the Crusades was the implementation of system of organized taxation, a lofty goal for the GOP (remember that's how this arabesque got started). Cheers Marty |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 10:01:05 -0800, Jonathan Ganz wrote:
He got more votes against a sitting president than any other candidate in history. Uh, he got more votes than any other candidate ever, except one. ;-( |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Baxter wrote:
Did a bit of reading last night, turns out the Crusades analogy is not so bad. The first Crusade was relatively successful, the objective was reached ('liberating' Jerusalem). The Second Crusade captured some more land, and shamelessly sacked Constantinople along the way. The last three Crusades were pretty much a bust and in the long run most of the territory fell back to the Saracens. The one great legacy of the Crusades was the implementation of system of organized taxation, a lofty goal for the GOP (remember that's how this arabesque got started). groan But seriously, the Crusades are a good analogy for present times... maybe those who don't know history really are condemned to repeat it. The Crusade served the European princes & kings fairly well at some secondary political goals, such as sending troublesome younger sons far away; also furthered the goals of the old Mediterranean trading powers, and introduced fractional reserve banking. Double entry accounting was invented somewhere in there too. A man named Steve Runciman has written several good books on the Crusades. IIRC the First Crusade was relatively straighforward. They succeeded in capturing Jerusalem and a fair amount of territory (thus giving those younger sons some area to rule) but it was 'just barely' and they never established self-supporting principalities. Just about the time these Crusader principalities got on their feet economically, and could develop reasonable trade relationships with neighboring Arab territories, a new wave of belligerent Crusaders arrived and knocked over the applecart. Crusaders that returned to Europe brought with them new technology and new tastes, and a much greater knowledge of the world around them. The Arabs which had overrun the Hellenic empires, inheritors of Alexander the Great, had a much greater familiarity with classical & ancient knowledge. This opened the door, several generations down the road, for the Renaissance. The crusading era ended with Saint Louis the Pious, (Louis Xth IIRC) who was blatantly delusional and a one-man military strategic disaster. Drawing the parallels to modern times is best left as an exercise for studious! Regards Doug King |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Scott Vernon wrote: "Jonathan Loser Ganz" wrote He got more votes against a sitting president than any other candidate in history. AND LOST !!!! he lost Ganz, you lost, get over it. Keep shouting... it makes you look even more stupid if that's possible. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
While you are apologizing, shouldn't you also mention your cynical (but
vacuous) notes posted throughout the year repeatedly bashing my Mac 26M? Jim Jonathan Ganz wrote: I apologize. I apologize to the right-wing and to Christian fundamentalists of our country. I was wrong to presume to believe that a majority of Americans believe in truth and justice for all our citizens, for the disenfranchised, for minorities, for the elderly who contributed all of their lives to our great land, for the young women of this country, who may soon have their right of privacy severely restrictedin the name of religion, for the poor in this country, who stuggle every day to put food in their children's mouths, pay the rent, and keep the heat on, and for the millions of Americans, children and adults, who have no health insurance. I apologize for believing that the owning a gun should be a priviledge not a right, and that owning a semi-automatic weapon is antithetical to a modern and free society. I apologize for believing that the right to speak freely and in a public forum should not be abridged, neither in times of peace nor in times of war. I apologize to the Bush administration for believing that we should not be beholden to foreign governments, all of whom are oppressing their own people, for oil regardless of how much money a few rich people might lose in the short term. I apologize for believing that there is an alternative to destroying our environment is the price we have to pay for being energy independent. I apologize for believing that insisting on peace between Israel and the Palestinians would solve more problems in the region than attacking a country, devestating their infrastructure, and occupying their land. I apologize for believing that we should honor our veterans, our commitments to them, and support their families, no matter what war they fought in, even if the war was unpopular. I apologize to the rest of the world for truly believing that we are more than the arrogant bully we really are. You deserve better from us, and I apologize for believing that we are better. Why am I apologizing? I'm apologizing because it's my fault. I didn't fight long enough or hard enough to make things right. I am one of the priviledged in this country. I have a decent job, good health and good health insurance, generally avery good life, more friends than I deserve, people who love me, and enough time to enjoy much of what life can offer. I thought that if I made a modest contribution of time, money, and passion to the cause of equality and justice for all, those things that I believe in would come to pass, and that we would all be better off. I was wrong. I now know that I may have waited too long to make a difference, to reverse the slide down the slippery slope of the aborgation of our civil rights, and away from the national and international obligations we have as the most powerful nation on Earth to stand up to the tyranny that exists both here and abroad. I am not sure that I'm arrogant enough to believe that I can still make a difference, nor am I sure that any one person can make a difference. I pledge to try harder. No more apologies. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I apologize for thinking anyone as stupid as you could possible string two
coherent sentences together about any boat, even a piece of crap Mac. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... While you are apologizing, shouldn't you also mention your cynical (but vacuous) notes posted throughout the year repeatedly bashing my Mac 26M? Jim Jonathan Ganz wrote: I apologize. I apologize to the right-wing and to Christian fundamentalists of our country. I was wrong to presume to believe that a majority of Americans believe in truth and justice for all our citizens, for the disenfranchised, for minorities, for the elderly who contributed all of their lives to our great land, for the young women of this country, who may soon have their right of privacy severely restrictedin the name of religion, for the poor in this country, who stuggle every day to put food in their children's mouths, pay the rent, and keep the heat on, and for the millions of Americans, children and adults, who have no health insurance. I apologize for believing that the owning a gun should be a priviledge not a right, and that owning a semi-automatic weapon is antithetical to a modern and free society. I apologize for believing that the right to speak freely and in a public forum should not be abridged, neither in times of peace nor in times of war. I apologize to the Bush administration for believing that we should not be beholden to foreign governments, all of whom are oppressing their own people, for oil regardless of how much money a few rich people might lose in the short term. I apologize for believing that there is an alternative to destroying our environment is the price we have to pay for being energy independent. I apologize for believing that insisting on peace between Israel and the Palestinians would solve more problems in the region than attacking a country, devestating their infrastructure, and occupying their land. I apologize for believing that we should honor our veterans, our commitments to them, and support their families, no matter what war they fought in, even if the war was unpopular. I apologize to the rest of the world for truly believing that we are more than the arrogant bully we really are. You deserve better from us, and I apologize for believing that we are better. Why am I apologizing? I'm apologizing because it's my fault. I didn't fight long enough or hard enough to make things right. I am one of the priviledged in this country. I have a decent job, good health and good health insurance, generally avery good life, more friends than I deserve, people who love me, and enough time to enjoy much of what life can offer. I thought that if I made a modest contribution of time, money, and passion to the cause of equality and justice for all, those things that I believe in would come to pass, and that we would all be better off. I was wrong. I now know that I may have waited too long to make a difference, to reverse the slide down the slippery slope of the aborgation of our civil rights, and away from the national and international obligations we have as the most powerful nation on Earth to stand up to the tyranny that exists both here and abroad. I am not sure that I'm arrogant enough to believe that I can still make a difference, nor am I sure that any one person can make a difference. I pledge to try harder. No more apologies. |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim, why would you care what a loser like ganz thinks about your boat?
Scotty "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... While you are apologizing, shouldn't you also mention your cynical (but vacuous) notes posted throughout the year repeatedly bashing my Mac 26M? Jim Jonathan LOSER Ganz wrote: I apologize. I apologize for being a LOSER.... |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
... Jim, why would you care what a loser like me thinks about your boat? Scotty "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... While you are apologizing, shouldn't you also mention your cynical (but vacuous) notes posted throughout the year repeatedly bashing my Mac 26M? Jim Jonathan LOSER Ganz wrote: I apologize. I apologize for being a LOSER.... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
( OT ) Why Won't Dubya Apologize? | General |