In article ,
Scott Vernon wrote:
And, to top it off, Bush gets re-elected by a majority of voters,
the
largest number in history. Sheesh...

because of losers like you.

But mostly because of fools like you. You're in the majority right?



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

you claim bush hasn't the capacity to capture/kill and is derelict in his
duty regarding osama, clinton had eight years to do it and was more
succesful?


Now let's pause for a second. If Clinton was derelict then Bush was even more
so. What's the logic in support a 2nd guy who lets terrorists flee and be free?

RB

In article ,
Bobsprit wrote:
you claim bush hasn't the capacity to capture/kill and is derelict in his
duty regarding osama, clinton had eight years to do it and was more
succesful?


Now let's pause for a second. If Clinton was derelict then Bush was even more
so. What's the logic in support a 2nd guy who lets terrorists flee and be free?

There's no logic. It's a matter of moral certitude. It's also called
being a bonehead.



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."