| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On 7 Oct 2004 10:19:07 -0500, Dave wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 20:13:33 -0700, (Thom Stewart) said: Was the picture of Edwards sitting at his side at a luncheon a phony? Was Edwards present at the Swearing In? That sort of quibbling is prolly not a wise argument for the Dems to make. It simply emphasizes Cheney's larger point--Edwards had an undistinguished Senate record and was in fact consistently AWOL from the Senate. The only two times the two met before were outside the Senate chambers. So what exactly is your point? Cheney said he had never met Edwards and he clearly *misspoke* and that is supposed to be a poor reflection on Edwards? Cheney was as wrong about his little cheap shots as he was on his larger issues. Perhaps what he meant to say was that he didn't know Edwards well enough to have told him to go f*ck himself. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Trounced!!! | ASA | |||
| Trounced AGAIN! | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
