| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Dave wrote: On 06 Oct 2004 21:23:27 GMT, (Bobsprit) said: If the Times called it a draw, you can be sure it was in fact a blow-out victory for Cheney. Davey, this just proves how biased you are. I'm an honest man, unlike you. The debate was a win for Edwards, but only marginally. No one is calling it a blowout. Like Jonathan, you need to read a bit more carefully for meaning. My remarks were not directed toward who won the debate, but to the Times's heavily biased reporting. Had you been reading my other posts (and I suspect you were) and reading carefully, you would have noted that my summary was advantage Cheney by a small margin. Like a bad poodle, you piddle where you shouldn't. Cheney LIED. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Trounced!!! | ASA | |||
| Trounced AGAIN! | ASA | |||
Threaded Mode
