|
In article ,
Dave wrote: On 7 Oct 2004 14:35:21 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) said: Under 1000 And over.....???? Zero... duhhhhh.... -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article ,
Dave wrote: On 12 Oct 2004 15:27:22 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) said: Zero... duhhhhh.... Ok, so you claim to have read one case. And that makes you an expert. Duhh... somewhere between 1 and 1000. Do you even know how many cases there have been? I bet not without looking it up. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article ,
Dave wrote: On 12 Oct 2004 17:47:04 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) said: Ok, so you claim to have read one case. And that makes you an expert. Duhh... somewhere between 1 and 1000. I question whether you've even read one. What was the case? Maybe you had to read Marbury v. Madison at some point? I know. You question, but you don't listen. Perhaps the answer will or will not be confidential. Does that answer your question? -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article ,
Dave wrote: On 13 Oct 2004 15:43:20 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) said: I question whether you've even read one. What was the case? Maybe you had to read Marbury v. Madison at some point? I know. You question, but you don't listen. Perhaps the answer will or will not be confidential. Does that answer your question? Nope. Just typical bobbing and weaving. Guess your military service or lack thereof is confidential too. So, what you're saying is that you didn't read the decision, and instead of admitting that you just pulled the question out of your ass, you think it'll go away by trying to put me down. I thought lawyers were supposed to have a brain cell or three. I guess not. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article ,
Dave wrote: On 14 Oct 2004 10:21:43 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) said: So, what you're saying is that you didn't read the decision Which decision, Jon. I've been asking you what the one decision you've read to make you an expert on Supreme Court opinion was, but you keep bobbing and weaving instead of answering the question. The one you asked me if read... you know Madison vs... one of the ones I've read. How many have you read Dave? Let me guess, zero. If you had read the one you asked me about, my answer about confidentiality would have made sense. Since it didn't make sense to you, that means either you didn't read it or you didn't understand it. Which one is more accurate? -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
In article ,
Dave wrote: On 14 Oct 2004 10:52:25 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz) said: The one you asked me if read... you know Madison vs... one of the ones I've read. Taking lessons from the President, Jon? Any reasonably well-educated high school senior would know that Marbury v. Madison established the principle that the Supreme Court has to power to determine whether an act of Congress is constitutional. How many have you read Dave? Let me guess, zero. Certainly in the high hundreds. Probably in the thousands. Now we all know you're lying. Thanks for the confirmation. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com