In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 6 Oct 2004 11:19:46 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

I grew up saying "under God," and I don't find it offensive. It's a
tempest in a teapot. The real issue is that the Supremes are aging and
if Bush gets a chance he'll appoint more people like Thomas or Scalia

I certainly hope so. The USSC is seriously off track. It needs a strong
reminder that its job is to exercise the judicial power and leave the
legislative power where it was placed by the Constitution, rather than
acting like a super-legislature. We need a couple of more justices like John
Marshall Harlan.

Yeh, we need more Supremes who think like Thomas... a guy who thinks
it's ok to joke about putting pubic hairs in Coke within earshot of a
woman. Good ole Thomas. He does exactly what Scalia tells him to do.



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

So you believe that some ignorant bumbkin who tries to "marry" his
sister is more qualified than you or I to decide the direction of the
country. Got it.

Jonathan, keep at it. You're continuing to prove my point.


That politicians can lie to you with no reprise? Yup. It's proven alright!

RB

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 6 Oct 2004 14:29:34 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

Yeh, we need more Supremes who think like Thomas... a guy who thinks
it's ok to joke about putting pubic hairs in Coke within earshot of a
woman. Good ole Thomas. He does exactly what Scalia tells him to do.

So tell me, Jonathan, how many opinions written by Thomas have you actually
read? How many by the other justices?

One of the differences between you and me is that I actually read USSC
decisions. And I do it fairly regularly. Not all of them, but reading some
of them comes with the territory in my job. You, on the other hand, seem to
get your views solely from the left side's propaganda mills.

So, you now claim that Thomas is the intellectual on the Court???
hahahahah!! good one Dave!


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 06 Oct 2004 21:35:08 GMT, (Bobsprit) said:

That politicians can lie to you with no reprise?

No. That folks like Ganz who haven't spent much time outside the left and
right coasts often have an extremely parochial view of the country and its
people.

I forgot. Dave is from a certain rural state where it's legal to marry
your sister.



--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
wrote:
Those that are actually familiar to any degree refer to the "Supreme Court of
The United States" as SCOTUS, not USSC. Here's another hint so you can lie
better next time: The President is called the POTUS.

Bill, Dave is actually called POOTUS.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
I ask again:

So tell me, Jonathan, how many opinions written by Thomas have you actually
read? How many by the other justices?

Come back and address the matter after you've acquired some very basic
familiarity with the subject. Else your nearly non-existent credibility
merely continues to plummet with each post.

No. I think you need to come back to the issue at hand. Bush and
Cheney are proven LIARS.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On 6 Oct 2004 16:31:06 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

No. That folks like Ganz who haven't spent much time outside the left and
right coasts often have an extremely parochial view of the country and its
people.

I forgot. Dave is from a certain rural state where it's legal to marry
your sister.

Keep it up, Jon. Your insularity becomes more obvious with each post.

You're the one who supposedly condones marrying your sister...




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

no
no answer will be had from ganz
he will attack and bow out
the nature of the beast
scream and yell
throw a fit
stomp his feet

but no
no answer will be had.

the democratic way you understand.
the idea of free speech you see.
being irresponsible has no bearing on the subject.

gf.


"Dave" wrote in message
...
On 6 Oct 2004 16:18:46 -0700, (Jonathan Ganz)
said:

So tell me, Jonathan, how many opinions written by Thomas have you
actually
read? How many by the other justices?

One of the differences between you and me is that I actually read USSC
decisions. And I do it fairly regularly. Not all of them, but reading
some
of them comes with the territory in my job. You, on the other hand, seem
to
get your views solely from the left side's propaganda mills.

So, you now claim that Thomas is the intellectual on the Court???
hahahahah!! good one Dave!

I ask again:

So tell me, Jonathan, how many opinions written by Thomas have you
actually
read? How many by the other justices?

Come back and address the matter after you've acquired some very basic
familiarity with the subject. Else your nearly non-existent credibility
merely continues to plummet with each post.

In article , gonefishiing wrote:
no
no answer will be had from ganz
he will attack and bow out
the nature of the beast
scream and yell
throw a fit
stomp his feet

but no
no answer will be had.

the democratic way you understand.
the idea of free speech you see.
being irresponsible has no bearing on the subject.

gf.

Perhaps, but if you go with what Dave and JoeJoe believe you don't
have free speech, you have a dictatorship.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

In article ,
Dave wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:48:57 GMT, said:

Those that are actually familiar to any degree refer to the "Supreme Court of
The United States" as SCOTUS, not USSC.

Wrong again, Bill. Those of us who are familiar with such matters cite the
applicable case. And from the citation anyone in the know recognizes what
the court is. We then refer to the "Court."

On the other hand those wishing to affect a false familiarity with such
matters bandy about buzzwords like SCOTUS and POTUS and expect everyone to
be impressed.

You are for sure POOTUS.


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."