Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DSK" wrote
Some years ago, various agencies were using Glaser loads but it wouldn't surprise me if something better was out there now. Why do you and the FBI think they're ineffective? Ineffective is a bad word. Before Glaser, court baliffs and others expecting to engage dangerous criminals but avoid "collateral damage" in a crowded courtroom, et cetera, handloaded .38 cal HBWCs upside down to create a super hollow point that hit hard but didn't come out the other side a la Fearless Fosdick to kill the judge or jurors. The Glaser "Safety" round does that even better, making it a good choice in a home or apartment where one would prefer not to penetrate walls. However, being designed NOT to penetrate far, it cannot produce a deep deadly wound channel nor penetrate a magazine, car window or much else without loosing knock-down capability. It is very effective at what it was designed to do but there are far more deadly general purpose bullets available. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone know a good online sailmaker? | Cruising | |||
A little OT good news for a snowy Monday! | General | |||
O.T. Some Good Points | General |