Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Horvath wrote: On 29 Sep 2004 07:26:32 -0700, (Joe) wrote this crap: Now that that usless uneffective ban is gone we now need to focus on getting rid of the ban on fully automatic weapons for law abiding citizens. Glock make an awesome fully automatic pistol called the model 18. It can fire 1200 9mm rounds per min. Comes with a 32 round clip. Why should cops and the FBI be the only ones able to own one? Because you'll runout of bullets in 1.6 seconds. Get a weapon with a rate of fire around 350 rounds per minute. Horass doesn't have to worry about it, since according to his boyfriend, he shoots blanks. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Horvath wrote in message . ..
On 29 Sep 2004 07:26:32 -0700, (Joe) wrote this crap: Now that that usless uneffective ban is gone we now need to focus on getting rid of the ban on fully automatic weapons for law abiding citizens. Glock make an awesome fully automatic pistol called the model 18. It can fire 1200 9mm rounds per min. Comes with a 32 round clip. Why should cops and the FBI be the only ones able to own one? Because you'll runout of bullets in 1.6 seconds. Get a weapon with a rate of fire around 350 rounds per minute. You can set it for select fire. A 3 round burst, single, or fully automatic. And they do sell extra clips. Joe Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Joe wrote:
You can set it for select fire. A 3 round burst, single, or fully automatic. And they do sell extra clips. The 3-round burst is what the very high cycle rate is for. It's very effective. Once upon a time while roaming around at a shooting event on a military base, I got a chance to try out a couple of select fire military arms (including a Galil and an FN-FAL) with 3-round burst. It is a huge advantage over timed fire. BTW since our gov't in it's wisdom will not let us have such dangerous toys, the Glaser "safety" slug is a good close approximation. Loses accuracy at range, but really kicks ass close up. DSK |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:16:00 -0400, something compelled DSK
, to say: BTW since our gov't in it's wisdom will not let us have such dangerous toys, the Glaser "safety" slug is a good close approximation. Loses accuracy at range, but really kicks ass close up. If I ever get shot, I hope it's with a Glasser. And the FBI agrees with me. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Steve Daniels wrote: On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:16:00 -0400, something compelled DSK , to say: BTW since our gov't in it's wisdom will not let us have such dangerous toys, the Glaser "safety" slug is a good close approximation. Loses accuracy at range, but really kicks ass close up. If I ever get shot, I hope it's with a Glasser. And the FBI agrees with me. I doubt the FBI would shoot you. Perhaps one of your boyfriends, but Hoover is dead. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Steve Daniels wrote:
If I ever get shot, I hope it's with a Glasser. And the FBI agrees with me. Why would you hope to get shot with anything, much less a specialized antipersonnel round? Some years ago, various agencies were using Glaser loads but it wouldn't surprise me if something better was out there now. Why do you and the FBI think they're ineffective? DSK |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I want to get shot with a Napoleonic Howitzer!
Gilligan "Steve Daniels" wrote in message ... On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:16:00 -0400, something compelled DSK , to say: BTW since our gov't in it's wisdom will not let us have such dangerous toys, the Glaser "safety" slug is a good close approximation. Loses accuracy at range, but really kicks ass close up. If I ever get shot, I hope it's with a Glasser. And the FBI agrees with me. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
DSK wrote: Joe wrote: You can set it for select fire. A 3 round burst, single, or fully automatic. And they do sell extra clips. The 3-round burst is what the very high cycle rate is for. It's very effective. Once upon a time while roaming around at a shooting event on a military base, I got a chance to try out a couple of select fire military arms (including a Galil and an FN-FAL) with 3-round burst. It is a huge advantage over timed fire. I never fired a modified FN (i.e. with full auto) but the recoil was quite large and seemed (to me) to make the semi-auto about as much as one would want. Could you keep it anywhere near a target on auto? How did you make it fire a 3 round burst -was it a further modification? Cheers |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nav wrote:
I never fired a modified FN (i.e. with full auto) but the recoil was quite large and seemed (to me) to make the semi-auto about as much as one would want. Could you keep it anywhere near a target on auto? I didn't fire it on full auto from the shoulder. With a bipod it's no problem. There are a lot of weapons with worse recoil, and not as good a balance, as the FN. The roller lock makes the recoil-reload action relatively smooth. ... How did you make it fire a 3 round burst -was it a further modification? It's one of the settings for select fire. Pull the trigger, it squirts out 3. Usually a pretty tight group even from the shoulder, too. DSK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anyone know a good online sailmaker? | Cruising | |||
A little OT good news for a snowy Monday! | General | |||
O.T. Some Good Points | General |