LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
John Cairns
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO PrepCom).

http://disarmament.un.org:8080/wmd/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

Notice it says that WMDs includes nuclear, biological, and chemical
weapons.


So what? It's wrong.


There is *no* comparison berween the destructive effects of chemical and
nuclear weapons.

Chemical weapons only affect people who are in the detonation area - just
like conventional bombs.

Nuclear, and bioligical weapons cause deaths outside the area of

detonation.
That is why they are defined as Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Regards


Donal


Due to their toxicity and method of dispersal(gaseous state) I would think
that chemical weapons do qualify as WMD's, they also can affect fairly large
areas, due to their method of dispersal, and like nukes, have severe
long-term after affects. And, chemical weapons are generally defined as
WMD's. Dead is dead.
http://www.nti.org/f_wmd411/f1a1.html

John Cairns





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017