"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 08 Sep 2004 10:05:16 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

NO WMDs NONE BUSH SAYS SO!


Sarin and mustard gas are not WMDs?

Correct, Horvath!

Sarin, and mustard gas are completely different to nuclear and bioligical
weapons.


Regards

Donal
--

President George W. Bush has never lied.


It takes a dumb putz to think that ANY politician has never lied.

RB

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 01:01:41 +0100, "Donal"
wrote this crap:


"Horvath" wrote in message
.. .
On 08 Sep 2004 10:05:16 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

NO WMDs NONE BUSH SAYS SO!


Sarin and mustard gas are not WMDs?

Correct, Horvath!

Sarin, and mustard gas are completely different to nuclear and bioligical
weapons.


WMDs include Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 01:01:41 +0100, "Donal"
wrote this crap:


"Horvath" wrote in message
.. .
Sarin and mustard gas are not WMDs?

Correct, Horvath!

Sarin, and mustard gas are completely different to nuclear and bioligical
weapons.


WMDs include Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons.

Since when?

Chemical weapons cause "local" damage. Nuclear and Biological weapons
spread their destruction over a very large area.

I bet that you cannot provide a convincing reason why mustard gas deserves
the label "WMD".



Regards


Donal
--

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 23:03:52 +0100, "Donal"
wrote this crap:

Correct, Horvath!

Sarin, and mustard gas are completely different to nuclear and bioligical
weapons.


WMDs include Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical weapons.

Since when?


The Weapons of Mass Destruction Branch provides substantive support
for the activities of the United Nations in the area of weapons of
mass destruction (nuclear, chemical and biological weapons), including
the threat of use of weapons of mass destruction in terrorist acts, as
well as missiles. The Branch follows closely all developments and
trends with regard to weapons of mass destruction in all their aspects
in order to keep the Secretary-General fully informed and to provide
information to Member States and the international community. The
Branch supports, and participates in, multilateral efforts to
strengthen the international norm on disarmament and non-proliferation
of weapons of mass destruction and, in this connection, it cooperates
with relevant intergovernmental organizations and specialized agencies
of the United Nations system, in particular the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA), the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW) and the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO PrepCom).

http://disarmament.un.org:8080/wmd/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notice it says that WMDs includes nuclear, biological, and chemical
weapons.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO PrepCom).

http://disarmament.un.org:8080/wmd/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

Notice it says that WMDs includes nuclear, biological, and chemical
weapons.


So what? It's wrong.


There is *no* comparison berween the destructive effects of chemical and
nuclear weapons.

Chemical weapons only affect people who are in the detonation area - just
like conventional bombs.

Nuclear, and bioligical weapons cause deaths outside the area of detonation.
That is why they are defined as Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO PrepCom).

http://disarmament.un.org:8080/wmd/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

Notice it says that WMDs includes nuclear, biological, and chemical
weapons.


So what? It's wrong.


There is *no* comparison berween the destructive effects of chemical and
nuclear weapons.

Chemical weapons only affect people who are in the detonation area - just
like conventional bombs.

Nuclear, and bioligical weapons cause deaths outside the area of
detonation.
That is why they are defined as Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Regards


Donal

Due to their toxicity and method of dispersal(gaseous state) I would think
that chemical weapons do qualify as WMD's, they also can affect fairly large
areas, due to their method of dispersal, and like nukes, have severe
long-term after affects. And, chemical weapons are generally defined as
WMD's. Dead is dead.
http://www.nti.org/f_wmd411/f1a1.html

John Cairns

On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 00:41:57 +0100, "Donal"
wrote this crap:


"Horvath" wrote in message
.. .
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO PrepCom).

http://disarmament.un.org:8080/wmd/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

Notice it says that WMDs includes nuclear, biological, and chemical
weapons.


So what? It's wrong.

You are ****ing whacked. That was off the UN website. Do a search
for "WMD" and you will see that EVERY website lists Nuclear Biological
and Chemical (NBC) weapons.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!