| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Joe wrote: (Jonathan Ganz) wrote in message ... In article , Marc wrote: Forespar gunmount self-tacking jib boom and roller furling jib in lieu of the Camberspar. This has been done on other freedoms and I like it, but expensive. Doyle Stack Pack on main. I have the Mack Pack, but still quite fussy. Wish it would point a little higher, but not in the nature of the beast. Good question... It's not practical but I would like a regular traveller on my Cal 20. Other than that and a better motor mount, I can't really think of anything. If it's not pratical why would you want it? Afraid that 2 hp might rip off your transom? Lost the arguments in the political arena, now you're on to looking like a fool regarding sailing topics... got it. It's not practical because I would like to better control the position of the boom, but I would have to redo the entire mainsheet set up, and I like using the barney post more than I care about boom position. As far as the engine goes, I hardly ever use it, but it's a 4 horse, 2 stroke, and it weighs about 35 pounds. The motor mount gets stuck some times when all the way down. Not a big deal for me, but when my friend uses the boat, she has trouble with it. -- Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m) http://www.sailnow.com "If there's no wind, row." |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | Cruising | |||
| ??? | General | |||
| WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | ASA | |||
| WHY SAILBOATS ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN | General | |||