Are you saying that the other COs let and accepted Kerry's false
reports? Didn't they even read the reports? I can't understand how they
didn't do anything about the reports at the time, is they knew they were
phony?


Dave wrote:
Most probably they didn't read them.

In that case, how can they claim to know what really happened more than
30 years later?

.... I recall from my Navy days
that paperwork was regarded mostly as a pain in the rear, something you did
because somebody required it, not something you dived into unnecessarily.

So, you're saying you gundecked official logs? And you're calling Kerry
bad names & questioning his veracity?

Nice.

BTW did you see on the news about Bush campaign officials resigning
before they could get in trouble for collaborating on the Swift Boat
Veterans smear? If you did, would you admit it?

DSK