Think about what has happened in Massachusetts.

It's the most liberal state in the Union. They've
destroyed the second amendment there. The
don't call it Taxachussets for nothing. Do we
want the US to be like that state? Heck no!

"felton" wrote
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:29:52 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"

Here is another good database of votig records, by issue.

http://www.voterpunch.org/

It is quite interesting, and, again, provides sufficient detail that
you can see where they arrive at their information, unlike the crap
that Loco posted. In this case, Kerry is ranked, overall, as the 24th
most "progressive", i.e. "liberal" member of the Senate, with Edwards
coming in at 33rd. Not exactly the 1st and 4th we've been hearing,
but I guess it depends on who does the scorekeeping. Besides, I have
never seen anything that supports those ranks other than some
Republican spinmeister spouting it on the talk shows, anyway.

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
. net...
Think about what has happened in Massachusetts.

It's the most liberal state in the Union. They've
destroyed the second amendment there. The
don't call it Taxachussets for nothing. Do we
want the US to be like that state? Heck no!

Hey Bart, your grasp of Massachusetts politics is about as poor as your
understanding of national politics. Massachusetts ranks 33rd in the nation in
terms of per capita taxes as a percentage of income.

Bart isn't too good with numbers or facts.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...
"Bart Senior" wrote in message
. net...
Think about what has happened in Massachusetts.

It's the most liberal state in the Union. They've
destroyed the second amendment there. The
don't call it Taxachussets for nothing. Do we
want the US to be like that state? Heck no!

Hey Bart, your grasp of Massachusetts politics is about as poor as your
understanding of national politics. Massachusetts ranks 33rd in the
nation in
terms of per capita taxes as a percentage of income.

Bart,

Felton's reply to all the BS you've been posting really deserves a reply
from you. Show the Satanic Liberals your rebuttals and the error of
their ways

Ole Thom

666 dude 666

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
Bart,

Felton's reply to all the BS you've been posting really deserves a reply
from you. Show the Satanic Liberals your rebuttals and the error of
their ways

Ole Thom

On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:19:24 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

666 dude 666


Is that now your middle name?





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

No. I'm just playing the devil's advocate.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:19:24 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

666 dude 666


Is that now your middle name?





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:17:08 -0400, "Jeff Morris"
wrote this crap:

Hey Bart, your grasp of Massachusetts politics is about as poor as your
understanding of national politics. Massachusetts ranks 33rd in the nation in
terms of per capita taxes as a percentage of income.

Got any proof? or are you just ****ing off the high side?





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Why would you even doubt that I have proof? Its only "conservatives" that make
up "facts."

http://taxpolicycenter.org/TaxFacts/...09&Topic2id=90



"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:17:08 -0400, "Jeff Morris"
wrote this crap:

Hey Bart, your grasp of Massachusetts politics is about as poor as your
understanding of national politics. Massachusetts ranks 33rd in the nation
in
terms of per capita taxes as a percentage of income.

Got any proof? or are you just ****ing off the high side?





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

He is right.

I was correct in that Massachussetts ranks 6th as
one of the worst states for high taxes per capita.

But there is more money in the state. If the higher
income leve is factored in Massachussetts rates much
better.

http://www.taxfoundation.org/staterankings.html

I also found out military retirement income is not
taxed in Massachusetts. Which was interesting.


"Horvath" wrote
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:17:08 -0400, "Jeff Morris"
wrote this crap:

Hey Bart, your grasp of Massachusetts politics is about as poor as your
understanding of national politics. Massachusetts ranks 33rd in the
nation in
terms of per capita taxes as a percentage of income.

Got any proof? or are you just ****ing off the high side?