Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On the contary. The greater the risk, the more sensible people chose a strong leader like GWB, over a lame, limp, extremist liberal like Kerry, who wants to take away our guns which we use to protect ourselves, who is soft on crime, doesn't support the death penalty, and who can't wait to sell out America to France and foreign interests for cash. American is strong because American's are strong. Why would anyone consider a lame leader that doesn't put America, and American's first. Kerry isn't strong enough to stand up to France, how can he stand up to terrorists? "Vito" wrote Because the greater the risk the more cowards will vote for him! Ya'see the kinds of people likely to support Bush are sorry excuses for Americans anyway, eager to cast off the liberty our forebearers sacrificed and died for on the promise of safety - and the scareder they are the more likely they are to vote for Bush and his nazi-like measures. Rush Limbaugh (asked) .... "How does Bush benefit from America being at greater risk?" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
A big day for Bush and Blair and Sen. Kennedy (little off topic) | General |