Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim, but what if the reason you haven't heard about it is
that after people buy the boat, they quickly come to realize (as most of us here have) that they're junk and decide not to sail the darn things??? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Jeff Morris wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Who are you talking about? If you take the time to read my note, I never suggested that popularity of the Macs equals quality. The point of the above discussion was to point out that, if the ridiculous statements about Macs being under built were true, BECAUSE there are thousands of them out there, we would have hundreds of reports every year about Macs breaking up and owners and passengers being lost. This is just one more example of the total lack of intellectual honesty of some participants on this ng. You can't dig much dirt out of what I say, so you deliberately lie about it and twist the discussion around to what you would have like for me to have said, but didn't. Do you disagree with my suggestion that, with thousands of Macs in use, IF THERE WERE serious deficiencies in the Macs, we would have many reports of Macs breaking up under normal weather conditions, and Onwers and passengers being lost? IF YOU DON'T, how do you explain the fact that thousands of Macs are sailing every year, thousands of Mac owners are happy with them, and very few reports are received regarding Mac failures? So you're saying that if less than 10% of the boats break up and cause fatalities, that's an acceptable ratio for you? This is just one more example of your flawed logic, and lack of intellectual honesty. Frankly, even one incident is enough to ring major alarms, especially when it shows that the warnings ARE deadly serious. BTW, you asked when you made your comments poo-pooing the warnigns. It was April 11 - here's more of the exchange with me: Me: The Mac is clearly unsafe without its water ballast. The admonishments include: no more than 4 people. Keep crew aft, low and centered. The kids can't even stay in the forward bunk! They actually tell you not to use the forward bunks when underway! They say it is unsafe in seas higher than one foot! So much for coming in from offshore. You can't stand on the deck because someone might grab the mast to hold on! What? They're afraid someone might pull the boat over trying to hold on??? No, this is not typical of a 26 foot sailboat, nor is it typical of a 26 foot powerboat. You: Jeff, have you had many dealings with corporate attorneys? Or tort lawyers? If you had, you would recognize that these warnings, if taken literally, are something like the warnings posted in our health center warning us to be sure to wear our seat belt when using the Nautilus weight training equipment. Or, like the long list of warnings you get when you purchase any electrical appliance, audio equipment, etc. Jeff, do you actually believe that the warnings regarding the Mac weren't reviewed by legal counsel? If so, I have several bridges you might have an interst in. (Note, This DOES NOT mean that the warnings about sailing without the water ballast shouldn't be taken seriously.) Jim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bought repaired canoe - positioning of seats/carry yoke correct? | Touring | |||
bought a GPS | Cruising | |||
( OT ) Iraq Coalition Casualtitys ( Coalition of the bought?) | General | |||
OT Hijacking a discussion, was Bought cool new digital charger....$89? | Electronics |