Nothing shaky about it. The point is simple:

Liberals never use their own money--its always yours.

If Kerry wants my respect, he can start by emptying out
his pockets and backing up his beliefs.

DSK wrote

Bart Senior wrote:
Kerry and Edwards are candidates with $1 to 3
billion dollars, and $70 million, respectively.

What is this business of taking everybody else's money
to feed and clothe people? Why not just do it themselves
if they really care?

Take a close look at who donates more to charities, Bart. You are
sprinting out onto a very shaky limb.

Well, in that case, send me your money Bart, since I don't use
mine, I'll use yours.

This is such right-wing trash that it's unbelieveable.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
. ..
Nothing shaky about it. The point is simple:

Liberals never use their own money--its always yours.

If Kerry wants my respect, he can start by emptying out
his pockets and backing up his beliefs.

DSK wrote

Bart Senior wrote:
Kerry and Edwards are candidates with $1 to 3
billion dollars, and $70 million, respectively.

What is this business of taking everybody else's money
to feed and clothe people? Why not just do it themselves
if they really care?

Take a close look at who donates more to charities, Bart. You are
sprinting out onto a very shaky limb.

Jon,

Don't you realize how much good John Kerry could
do if he gave some of his wealth to charity? If he
and his wife gave away half of their personal wealth
they would still have enough money to support their
descendants for the next 15 generations.

If they gave away 10% which could be as much as
$300 million! They could do tremendous good.

People with wealth like this, and liberal beliefs
can act on their beliefs.

But no, Kerry is a hypocrite. It's never his money.
--it's always ours. He'd rather vote to increase
spending and raise our taxes, choke off the
economy, and sell us out, while he lives like a king
and a hypocrite.


Jonathan Ganz wrote

Well, in that case, send me your money Bart, since I don't use
mine, I'll use yours.

This is such right-wing trash that it's unbelieveable.

"Bart Senior" wrote

Nothing shaky about it. The point is simple:

Liberals never use their own money--its always yours.

If Kerry wants my respect, he can start by emptying out
his pockets and backing up his beliefs.

DSK wrote

Bart Senior wrote:
Kerry and Edwards are candidates with $1 to 3
billion dollars, and $70 million, respectively.

What is this business of taking everybody else's money
to feed and clothe people? Why not just do it themselves
if they really care?

Take a close look at who donates more to charities, Bart. You are
sprinting out onto a very shaky limb.

Bart, do you realize how much good Bush/Cheney could do if
they stopped pandering to their corporate friends? The environment,
healthcare, jobs? They could do far more good than Kerry giving 10%.
Get with it man. Bush comes from a family with lots and lots of money
and connections. Cheney made millions working for an oil company
that is now the benefit of the Iraq invasion.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
...
Jon,

Don't you realize how much good John Kerry could
do if he gave some of his wealth to charity? If he
and his wife gave away half of their personal wealth
they would still have enough money to support their
descendants for the next 15 generations.

If they gave away 10% which could be as much as
$300 million! They could do tremendous good.

People with wealth like this, and liberal beliefs
can act on their beliefs.

But no, Kerry is a hypocrite. It's never his money.
--it's always ours. He'd rather vote to increase
spending and raise our taxes, choke off the
economy, and sell us out, while he lives like a king
and a hypocrite.


Jonathan Ganz wrote

Well, in that case, send me your money Bart, since I don't use
mine, I'll use yours.

This is such right-wing trash that it's unbelieveable.

"Bart Senior" wrote

Nothing shaky about it. The point is simple:

Liberals never use their own money--its always yours.

If Kerry wants my respect, he can start by emptying out
his pockets and backing up his beliefs.

DSK wrote

Bart Senior wrote:
Kerry and Edwards are candidates with $1 to 3
billion dollars, and $70 million, respectively.

What is this business of taking everybody else's money
to feed and clothe people? Why not just do it themselves
if they really care?

Take a close look at who donates more to charities, Bart. You are
sprinting out onto a very shaky limb.

Bart Senior wrote:
Nothing shaky about it. The point is simple:

Liberals never use their own money--its always yours.

If Kerry wants my respect, he can start by emptying out
his pockets and backing up his beliefs.

Bart, your last few posts have had a resoundingly close-minded tone.
It's to your credit that you pretend you might consider anything good
about Kerry, but I suspect that it's a sham... you might as well believe
that George W. Bush is sent from God to rule over us. Many people do. I
prefer the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights myself.

The facts are simple... George Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney care nothing
about the less fortunate, or even the average person, and their
"compassionate conservatism" is just a gimmick. Neither gives anything
to charity. Teresa Heinz Kerry devotes a considerable percentage of her
wealth, and great deal of time, to running several large charitable
foundations. This is very plain & obvious fact. If it has no impact
whatever on your thinking, then so be it.

DSK

Teresa Heinz Kerry devotes a considerable percentage of her
wealth, and great deal of time, to running several large charitable
foundations.

Means nothing. Most wealthy people the likes of Ms Heinz are involved with
charities to build up good will in the community to keep the higher ups in gov.
off their backs when scandels happen.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
"No shirt, no skirt, full service"

Teresa Heinz Kerry devotes a considerable percentage of her
wealth, and great deal of time, to running several large charitable
foundations.

SAIL LOCO wrote:
Means nothing.

Oh yeah. If Bush or Cheney gave 1/10th as much as the Kerrys, they'd be
trumpeting it from every rooftop.


... Most wealthy people the likes of Ms Heinz are involved with
charities to build up good will in the community to keep the higher ups in gov.
off their backs when scandels happen.

Huh. Didn't work for Ken Lay, did it?

Oh and check this out

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4732081/

Greed is good.

DSK

George Bush Jr. and Dick Cheney care nothing
about the less fortunate, or even the average person, and their
"compassionate conservatism" is just a gimmick. Neither gives anything
to charity.

Not true and can you prove it. If they gave nothing to charity the press would
have a field day.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
"No shirt, no skirt, full service"

SAIL LOCO wrote:
Not true and can you prove it. If they gave nothing to charity the press would
have a field day.


Oh, you mean the "liberal biased press" that never mentions Dick
Cheney's stock options or the ever-changing, nebulous reasons fro
starting a war in Iraq, and pretty much ignored the diverting of funds
earmarked for Afghanistan, ditto giving up on finding Osama Bin Laden,
etc etc etc?

The tax returns of Presidential Vice-Presidential candidates are public
records. Don't believe me, look it up yourself. Unless you're more
comfortable repeating old lies.

DSK

Check into how many food plants Teresa Heinz Kerry has moved from the US to
Mexico. That's caring "about the less fortunate, or even the average person"
Goes along with hubbies pitch about "a better America" and bringing jobs to
America.
S/V Express 30 "Ringmaster"
"No shirt, no skirt, full service"