|
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made.
After Kerry blew-off the U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting in Boston earlier this week, Menino was quoted as saying of Kerry's refusal to appear and subsequent actions, "This is typical of small- minded individuals who have to create controversy." John Kerry has taken some flack over the absence of African Americans among his top campaign advisors and a "certain amount of awkwardness," was reported during his speech at Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH event Tuesday. Jackson had earlier been quoted describing Kerry as "the best we have to work with." "When he was running for Lieutenant Governor in 1982, John Kerry campaigned against planning for state evacuation in the event of a nuclear attack. He actually ran a radio ad saying, 'Someone has to stand up and say 'no' to this madness.'" During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Comments interspersed...
"Bart Senior" wrote in message . net... John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? After Kerry blew-off the U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting in Boston earlier this week, Menino was quoted as saying of Kerry's refusal to appear and subsequent actions, "This is typical of small- minded individuals who have to create controversy." He didn't want to cross a picket line. He's never crossed a picket line. He wants the union votes more than the mayors votes. Seems logical to me. John Kerry has taken some flack over the absence of African Americans among his top campaign advisors and a "certain amount of awkwardness," was reported during his speech at Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH event Tuesday. Jackson had earlier been quoted describing Kerry as "the best we have to work with." Seems like he would be perfect for the racists who don't think minorities should be involved in decision making. So, is this a good or bad thing from your perspective? "When he was running for Lieutenant Governor in 1982, John Kerry campaigned against planning for state evacuation in the event of a nuclear attack. He actually ran a radio ad saying, 'Someone has to stand up and say 'no' to this madness.'" Sounds like it was a huge waste of money. Where are people supposed to go, Canada? During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Jonathan Ganz wrote "Bart Senior" wrote John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Good point Jon. I should be happy he doesn't show up. After Kerry blew-off the U.S. Conference of Mayors meeting in Boston earlier this week, Menino was quoted as saying of Kerry's refusal to appear and subsequent actions, "This is typical of small- minded individuals who have to create controversy." He didn't want to cross a picket line. He's never crossed a picket line. He wants the union votes more than the mayors votes. Seems logical to me. Seems like a lame reason to me. John Kerry has taken some flack over the absence of African Americans among his top campaign advisors and a "certain amount of awkwardness," was reported during his speech at Jesse Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH event Tuesday. Jackson had earlier been quoted describing Kerry as "the best we have to work with." Seems like he would be perfect for the racists who don't think minorities should be involved in decision making. So, is this a good or bad thing from your perspective? So why do you support him? Are you a racist? I'd keep my distance from Jackson. The guy is an idiot. "When he was running for Lieutenant Governor in 1982, John Kerry campaigned against planning for state evacuation in the event of a nuclear attack. He actually ran a radio ad saying, 'Someone has to stand up and say 'no' to this madness.'" Sounds like it was a huge waste of money. Where are people supposed to go, Canada? It had nothing to do with money. "Kerry justified not being prepared by saying a nuclear attack was 'unthinkable.' On 9/11, America learned planning for the 'unthinkable' must be our first priority. Kerry's lack of judgment on preparation for an attack at the height of the Cold War calls into question whether he has the judgment necessary to lead our nation today in a time of terrorist threats. President Bush's leadership in the face of these threats has made our nation safer and more secure." During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... She was talking about taking back tax cuts to give more to the needy zeros. Full Quote: "Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Karl Marx could not have said it better. Hillary Clinton is a communist. If the people in the communist countries recognize the importance of a free market, why don't the liberals? Go live in Russia and see what it is like before you vote liberal and vote to destroy the US. While there is no better place than the 'leftiest big city on the Left Coast' to spout this socialist drivel, this shows why Hillary Clinton is still not quite ready for primetime when it comes to politics. Socialist type phrases "for the common good" don't play very well outside those pockets of liberalism. Getting back on track? Increasing taxes puts us back on track? Putting us back on track would be to stop the out of control spending. taxation is worse in this country than every before--every form of tax is being levied. In Connecticut, you pay taxes on products you return to the store! You pay taxes on used cars--when taxes have already been paid on them mulitple times with eash sale? Why? The bureacracy is getting bigger and bigger, requiring more and more money. It has to stop. Letting liberalism run it's course and we will end up with dead beats voting themselves more benefits at the expense of productive workers, and a crippled economy consisting of mainly lower class incomes. The trend is clear. The middle class is paying for what the Democrats vote for themselves. Not hte rich. The rich move their money to the Cayman Island while working people pay the price. The liberal politicians have sold out America because the job pays well, and it give them an opportunity for graft, and kickbacks, not because they believe in what they say. Look at what happened in California, when worker's comp was increased --2/3 of the industry tax revenue left the state! The world 9th largest economy crumbled, and may never recover. People will not stand around letting themselves be robbed through excessive taxation. If you want to give, then give. Don't mandate that everyone else lose their homes, and what they have just because the poor majority votes themselves more benefits. If this continues, most of the money will leave the US and there will be a crippled US economey and ghost of a tax base. What will the liberals do then? Eat each other? Vote smart. Vote conservative or there won't be any country for your children to enjoy, only oppressive taxation, which history has shown, over and over again to cripple economies. A conservative vote is a vote for freedom and our future. |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job.
I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Bart Senior" wrote John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. ..... Y'know you might be right - Kerry and his fellow liberal democrats MIGHT ruin the country if elected. But what's the alternative? Bush and the other village idiots running congress are ruining the country right now. Four years ago we were haggling about using the surplus to pay off the national debt and our 401Ks were growing steadily. Now we have two concurrent wars going on, we have people locked down without due process, the surplus was turned into the biggest deficites ever and our 401Ks still haven't recovered from the Bush recession. So what do you suggest? Me? I'm writing in Hillary. She couldn't be worse that Bush or Kerry. BTW did y'all know she was a big Goldwater supporter? Why'd she switch? Cuz the Democrat Party is closer to Barry's 'radical' doctern of fiscal conservatism and government obedience to the Constitution than the barrow-and-spend religious zealots who took over the Republican party. |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Maxprop" wrote
During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Are you making 10 million a year? If not, then that hasn't been true since the jesus freaks took over the GOP. Reagan spent more money than any democrat before him and The Village Idiot is spending far more than Hillary's front man did. Difference is democrats taxed people making over a $million a year under the Clintoons but Republicans barrow it, leaving our kids and grandkids to pay for our not-so-good times- plus interest. |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 08:12:00 -0400, "Vito" wrote:
"Bart Senior" wrote John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. ..... Y'know you might be right - Kerry and his fellow liberal democrats MIGHT ruin the country if elected. But what's the alternative? Bush and the other village idiots running congress are ruining the country right now. snip My thinking exactly. I am much more comfortable with the White House and the Congress not being controlled by the same party...either party. When we have that dreaded "gridlock", the politicians are forced to compromise somewhere in the middle, where most of us find ourselves politically, anyway. Bush is not a hypothetical at this point, he is a proven disaster. I don't know what Kerry could do that could possibly be as misguided as this administration and I would hate to think what this group would do with another four years, as they seem to be on a mission to screw up everything they can get their hands on. |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
what have you got against burger flippers?
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Fine, write me a check.
Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. The economy that began falling with the tech collapse a few years ago, began in Britian when they auctioned off frequency spectrum to the highest telecom bidders, instead of the best qualified companies. The result was that government gained $36 billion instead of the expected $9 billion. Nations around the world got greedy and did the same thing. The companys that got the frequency specturm stood likely to make billions, but not right away. First they had to pay for it, and they didn't have the money. To finance all that, telecom corporations faked growth figures and bankers financed them when they shouldn't. When growth figures were not met, Nokia and other cell makers crashed followed by telecom stocks, then the whole tech sector, then the entire market. If you want to point the finger at any President. Clinton is the clear winner by being a cheat and greedy himself, he set the example that everyone else followed. And he pardoned those who paid him off. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. The Democrats never look at the long picture, their policy is appeasement, like England's Chamberlin in WWII--that never works. It takes toughness and moral intergirty to look after the common good, not personal greedy so prevalent in the Democratic Party. Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. Jonathan Ganz wrote I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:35:27 -0700, Jonathan Ganz wrote:
During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like some of Bush's tax cuts. In context: http://www.sfexaminer.com/article/in...2904n_clintons |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
I eat too many of them.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... what have you got against burger flippers? "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
I'm sorry you lost your job, but your facts are twisted around.
Anyone who takes a dispassionate look at the economy would see that Clinton did everything he could for the economy, while Bush did nothing. Clinton lied about a blow job. Bush lied about WMDs and a war that has brought this country nothing but heartache and discrace. Clinton never lied about his lack of service. Bush didn't even bother to show up for his physical. Clinton may be a sex addict, but Bush is addicted to alcohol. Good on him that he hasn't had a drink in a long time. I hope he stays sober throughout the rest of his term, although he acts like he's drunk most of the time. He's inarticulate and low brow. He picked a liar and a cheat for his VP, as well as for most of his cabinet. He picked a guy for attorney general who lost an election to a dead guy and who annointed himself with oil. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bart Senior" wrote in message t... Fine, write me a check. Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. The economy that began falling with the tech collapse a few years ago, began in Britian when they auctioned off frequency spectrum to the highest telecom bidders, instead of the best qualified companies. The result was that government gained $36 billion instead of the expected $9 billion. Nations around the world got greedy and did the same thing. The companys that got the frequency specturm stood likely to make billions, but not right away. First they had to pay for it, and they didn't have the money. To finance all that, telecom corporations faked growth figures and bankers financed them when they shouldn't. When growth figures were not met, Nokia and other cell makers crashed followed by telecom stocks, then the whole tech sector, then the entire market. If you want to point the finger at any President. Clinton is the clear winner by being a cheat and greedy himself, he set the example that everyone else followed. And he pardoned those who paid him off. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. The Democrats never look at the long picture, their policy is appeasement, like England's Chamberlin in WWII--that never works. It takes toughness and moral intergirty to look after the common good, not personal greedy so prevalent in the Democratic Party. Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. Jonathan Ganz wrote I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Bart Senior" wrote in message
t... The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. This has to be the silliest thing you, or anyone else, has ever said in this forum. |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 12:44:59 -0400, thunder
wrote: On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:35:27 -0700, Jonathan Ganz wrote: During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like some of Bush's tax cuts. In context: http://www.sfexaminer.com/article/in...2904n_clintons Ultimately every dollar that government spends has to be paid for somehow, by someone sometime. If you think those tax cuts created "free money" you are mistaken. When John McCain says that the current Republican Congress spends money in a way that puts drunken sailors to shame, that should tell you something about the "fiscally responsible" party. Besides, unless you are very well off, most of the Bush tax cuts didn't help you, anyway. |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Bart Senior wrote:
Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. That may be, but the economy as a whole grew at an unprecedented pace. Don't forget that there was a serious Bush Sr recession going on when Clinton took office. If your job was eliminated in the first 3 1/2 years of Clinton's presidency, then according to many pro-Bush folk it must be Bush Sr's fault. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. ??? "Greed Is Good" was the motto of the Reagan '80s. Clinton's venture into Whitewater lost money. It would be a very strange example of corporate greed. The economy that began falling with the tech collapse a few years ago, began in Britian when they auctioned off frequency spectrum to the highest telecom bidders, instead of the best qualified companies. The result was that government gained $36 billion instead of the expected $9 billion. Nations around the world got greedy and did the same thing. Part of Reaganomics, not Clinton's fault. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. You should check out his past, Bart. Do you think his deals with Harken Energy are an example of integrity? How about his deals with the Texas baseball team? His DUIs? His military record? His coziness with ENRON which was plundered by it's corporate officers, robbing many manypeople of their jobs, their savngs, and their future? Maybe you think his smear tactics against McCain in the 2000 campaign are a good example of "integrity & morals"? Frankly I cannot comprehend how you think this of Bush. The Democrats never look at the long picture, their policy is appeasement, like England's Chamberlin in WWII--that never works. Actually, that is not and has never been any part of Democrat policy. http://www-tech.mit.edu/V112/N5/dividend.05w.html It is however a very common Republican smear tactic. Sort of like the way Maxprop is convinced that I must be a libby-rull because I disagree with his caveman fascism. It takes toughness and moral intergirty to look after the common good, not personal greedy so prevalent in the Democratic Party. Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. Maybe Teresa Heinz-Kerry? She is by far the richest of them, but she married into it. They say that's the hardest way to earn it, though.... Hillary is a Socialist, greed is not in their nature. But she has wangled a pretty high lifestyle out of the deal. Billy-Bob is entirely too self centered. Jesse Jackson would probably be greedy if he could attract more contributions. So far, none of them have started a war so that their own companies could profit, as Cheney has done with Halliburton. So far none of them has overcharged the U.S. Gov't approx 80 million dollars (and counting), as Halliburton has done. This is not partisan rhetoric, Bart, it is fact. http://www.halliburton.com/news/arch...cle_121703.jsp http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...2/232434.shtml http://www.construction.com/NewsCent.../20040123a.asp http://www.washtimes.com/business/20...1603-4141r.htm http://houston.bizjournals.com/houst...9/daily45.html And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Or you can, of course, dismiss all the above as wild-eyed leftist propaganda. But somehow, I don't think that Pentagon auditors, much less Halliburton's own news service, are really trying hard to smear mud on the Bush Administration. Regards Doug King |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:29:27 +0000, Bart Senior wrote:
The Democrats never look at the long picture, their policy is appeasement, like England's Chamberlin in WWII--that never works. It takes toughness and moral intergirty to look after the common good, not personal greedy so prevalent in the Democratic Party. Neville Chamberlain was a Conservative. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/PRchamberlain.htm |
Who is John Kerry? He's a former prosecutor.
In desperate need !
If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. The fact that David Sween is responsible for saving Scott Peterson became graphically plain recently, when the disgraced prosecution tried to save the reputation of the incompetent, Detective Allen Brocchini. The detective had gotten a call about how Scott dumped Laci in the ocean on April 19, 2003, a day after Scott Peterson was arrested, but Detective Allen Brocchini did not follow up because, in his words, "I just couldn't corroborate it, and I just didn't put a lot of stock in it." In retrospect, such a call is consistent with the persistent effort to frame Scott Peterson, and investigator, David Sween, had virually made that crystal clear when he wrote the following report: http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm So you see, if David Sween did not methodically and systematically expose every absurd plot to frame Scott Peterson, the prosecution might have fraudulently "cemented" the case against Scott early on, and he may have died in prison, just like Richard Albert Ricci did. The April 19 telephone call tip that Brochini dismissed is the very same one that the prosecution has currently embraced, and that is a clear indication of the fact that earlier efforts to frame Scott Peterson were discarded because David Sween exposed every fraudulent effort to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson. If Scott has a guardian angel looking over his shoulder, his name is David Sween, and I seriously believe that in the absence of his brilliant reporting, Scott Peterson would be dead. _____________________________ this was posted on the nsnews message board and it is worth repeating here ! http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Geez... there are just too many closet gay guys here.
Even innocent remarks turn into this.... sorry, I know it's one of your fantasies, but I'm only interested in women. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com wrote in message ... On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:54:31 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz" wrote: I eat too many of them. You eat burger flippers? Are the Gay Ganzy rumors really true? I always thought it was just people kidding about you. BB -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... what have you got against burger flippers? |
Who is John Kerry? He's a former prosecutor.
What the heck are you talking about????
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Madelin McKinnon" wrote in message om... In desperate need ! If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. The fact that David Sween is responsible for saving Scott Peterson became graphically plain recently, when the disgraced prosecution tried to save the reputation of the incompetent, Detective Allen Brocchini. The detective had gotten a call about how Scott dumped Laci in the ocean on April 19, 2003, a day after Scott Peterson was arrested, but Detective Allen Brocchini did not follow up because, in his words, "I just couldn't corroborate it, and I just didn't put a lot of stock in it." In retrospect, such a call is consistent with the persistent effort to frame Scott Peterson, and investigator, David Sween, had virually made that crystal clear when he wrote the following report: http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm So you see, if David Sween did not methodically and systematically expose every absurd plot to frame Scott Peterson, the prosecution might have fraudulently "cemented" the case against Scott early on, and he may have died in prison, just like Richard Albert Ricci did. The April 19 telephone call tip that Brochini dismissed is the very same one that the prosecution has currently embraced, and that is a clear indication of the fact that earlier efforts to frame Scott Peterson were discarded because David Sween exposed every fraudulent effort to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson. If Scott has a guardian angel looking over his shoulder, his name is David Sween, and I seriously believe that in the absence of his brilliant reporting, Scott Peterson would be dead. _____________________________ this was posted on the nsnews message board and it is worth repeating here ! http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm |
Who is John Kerry? He's a former prosecutor.
Brilliantly insightful!
"Madelin McKinnon" wrote in message om... In desperate need ! If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. The fact that David Sween is responsible for saving Scott Peterson became graphically plain recently, when the disgraced prosecution tried to save the reputation of the incompetent, Detective Allen Brocchini. The detective had gotten a call about how Scott dumped Laci in the ocean on April 19, 2003, a day after Scott Peterson was arrested, but Detective Allen Brocchini did not follow up because, in his words, "I just couldn't corroborate it, and I just didn't put a lot of stock in it." In retrospect, such a call is consistent with the persistent effort to frame Scott Peterson, and investigator, David Sween, had virually made that crystal clear when he wrote the following report: http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm So you see, if David Sween did not methodically and systematically expose every absurd plot to frame Scott Peterson, the prosecution might have fraudulently "cemented" the case against Scott early on, and he may have died in prison, just like Richard Albert Ricci did. The April 19 telephone call tip that Brochini dismissed is the very same one that the prosecution has currently embraced, and that is a clear indication of the fact that earlier efforts to frame Scott Peterson were discarded because David Sween exposed every fraudulent effort to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson. If Scott has a guardian angel looking over his shoulder, his name is David Sween, and I seriously believe that in the absence of his brilliant reporting, Scott Peterson would be dead. _____________________________ this was posted on the nsnews message board and it is worth repeating here ! http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Obviously all wide eyed leftist propaganda you're spewing!
"DSK" wrote in message ... Bart Senior wrote: Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. That may be, but the economy as a whole grew at an unprecedented pace. Don't forget that there was a serious Bush Sr recession going on when Clinton took office. If your job was eliminated in the first 3 1/2 years of Clinton's presidency, then according to many pro-Bush folk it must be Bush Sr's fault. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. ??? "Greed Is Good" was the motto of the Reagan '80s. Clinton's venture into Whitewater lost money. It would be a very strange example of corporate greed. The economy that began falling with the tech collapse a few years ago, began in Britian when they auctioned off frequency spectrum to the highest telecom bidders, instead of the best qualified companies. The result was that government gained $36 billion instead of the expected $9 billion. Nations around the world got greedy and did the same thing. Part of Reaganomics, not Clinton's fault. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. You should check out his past, Bart. Do you think his deals with Harken Energy are an example of integrity? How about his deals with the Texas baseball team? His DUIs? His military record? His coziness with ENRON which was plundered by it's corporate officers, robbing many manypeople of their jobs, their savngs, and their future? Maybe you think his smear tactics against McCain in the 2000 campaign are a good example of "integrity & morals"? Frankly I cannot comprehend how you think this of Bush. The Democrats never look at the long picture, their policy is appeasement, like England's Chamberlin in WWII--that never works. Actually, that is not and has never been any part of Democrat policy. http://www-tech.mit.edu/V112/N5/dividend.05w.html It is however a very common Republican smear tactic. Sort of like the way Maxprop is convinced that I must be a libby-rull because I disagree with his caveman fascism. It takes toughness and moral intergirty to look after the common good, not personal greedy so prevalent in the Democratic Party. Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. Maybe Teresa Heinz-Kerry? She is by far the richest of them, but she married into it. They say that's the hardest way to earn it, though.... Hillary is a Socialist, greed is not in their nature. But she has wangled a pretty high lifestyle out of the deal. Billy-Bob is entirely too self centered. Jesse Jackson would probably be greedy if he could attract more contributions. So far, none of them have started a war so that their own companies could profit, as Cheney has done with Halliburton. So far none of them has overcharged the U.S. Gov't approx 80 million dollars (and counting), as Halliburton has done. This is not partisan rhetoric, Bart, it is fact. http://www.halliburton.com/news/arch...cle_121703.jsp http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...2/232434.shtml http://www.construction.com/NewsCent.../20040123a.asp http://www.washtimes.com/business/20...1603-4141r.htm http://houston.bizjournals.com/houst...9/daily45.html And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Or you can, of course, dismiss all the above as wild-eyed leftist propaganda. But somehow, I don't think that Pentagon auditors, much less Halliburton's own news service, are really trying hard to smear mud on the Bush Administration. Regards Doug King |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
thunder wrote:
Neville Chamberlain was a Conservative. Now don't go pointing out facts to the zealots, likely to cause apoplexy. Cheers\ Marty |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:12:07 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap: Geez... there are just too many closet gay guys here. Even innocent remarks turn into this.... sorry, I know it's one of your fantasies, but I'm only interested in women. Women with penises. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
Who is John Kerry? He's a former prosecutor.
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message link.net...
Brilliantly insightful! "Madelin McKinnon" wrote in message om... In desperate need ! If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. The fact that David Sween is responsible for saving Scott Peterson became graphically plain recently, when the disgraced prosecution tried to save the reputation of the incompetent, Detective Allen Brocchini. The detective had gotten a call about how Scott dumped Laci in the ocean on April 19, 2003, a day after Scott Peterson was arrested, but Detective Allen Brocchini did not follow up because, in his words, "I just couldn't corroborate it, and I just didn't put a lot of stock in it." In retrospect, such a call is consistent with the persistent effort to frame Scott Peterson, and investigator, David Sween, had virually made that crystal clear when he wrote the following report: http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm So you see, if David Sween did not methodically and systematically expose every absurd plot to frame Scott Peterson, the prosecution might have fraudulently "cemented" the case against Scott early on, and he may have died in prison, just like Richard Albert Ricci did. The April 19 telephone call tip that Brochini dismissed is the very same one that the prosecution has currently embraced, and that is a clear indication of the fact that earlier efforts to frame Scott Peterson were discarded because David Sween exposed every fraudulent effort to "cement" the case against Scott Peterson. If Scott has a guardian angel looking over his shoulder, his name is David Sween, and I seriously believe that in the absence of his brilliant reporting, Scott Peterson would be dead. _____________________________ this was posted on the nsnews message board and it is worth repeating here ! http://www.geocities.com/botenth/scott.htm i love the 'unanimous jury' link |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Bart Senior" wrote in message et...
Fine, write me a check. Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. The economy that began falling with the tech collapse a few years ago, began in Britian when they auctioned off frequency spectrum to the highest telecom bidders, instead of the best qualified companies. The result was that government gained $36 billion instead of the expected $9 billion. Nations around the world got greedy and did the same thing. Who did you work for JDS ? Joe The companys that got the frequency specturm stood likely to make billions, but not right away. First they had to pay for it, and they didn't have the money. To finance all that, telecom corporations faked growth figures and bankers financed them when they shouldn't. When growth figures were not met, Nokia and other cell makers crashed followed by telecom stocks, then the whole tech sector, then the entire market. If you want to point the finger at any President. Clinton is the clear winner by being a cheat and greedy himself, he set the example that everyone else followed. And he pardoned those who paid him off. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. The Democrats never look at the long picture, their policy is appeasement, like England's Chamberlin in WWII--that never works. It takes toughness and moral intergirty to look after the common good, not personal greedy so prevalent in the Democratic Party. Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. Jonathan Ganz wrote I think the worst offender is someone who takes away your job. I'd gladly give up some cash to have the job market actually be stable or growing (not talking about burger flippers). Talk to Bu****. He's taken away millions of jobs. Fortunately, despite him, they're starting to come back. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message Comments interspersed... "Bart Senior" wrote in message John Kerry has missed more Senate votes this session than he's made. Are you trying to say that this is a good or bad thing? Works for me. Now if we could just get the other 99 senators to "miss" votes. During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Max |
Who is John Kerry? He's a former prosecutor.
Everyone knows who killed Laci Peterson.
It was John Kerry. See how much fun it is to lie like a liberal! Madelin McKinnon wrote In desperate need ! If it wasn't for the investigative reports of David Sween, who has been one step ahead of the effort to frame an innocent man, Scott Peterson would have been dead and buried by now, just like Richard Albert Ricci was. |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Bwahahahahahahahaaaa...... explains a lot about you Horvat!!
"Horvath" confessed in message | Women with penises. |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Bart Senior" wrote in message Fine, write me a check. Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. Don't yell at me, Bart. You're preaching to the choir here. A (perhaps "the") major job loss factor is NAFTA, which was supported by and signed into law by WJClinton. And yes, Whitewater paved the way for unrepentant corporate greed. Odd how the current crop of know-nothing liberals blame Bush for all the above. snip If you want to point the finger at any President. Clinton is the clear winner by being a cheat and greedy himself, he set the example that everyone else followed. And he pardoned those who paid him off. This seems to have been conveniently forgotten by the left. His eleventh hour pardons were legendary in terms of corporate greed, political payoffs, and criminal non-accountability. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. I might have to disagree a bit here. Bush is a politician first, foremost. Politicians want to keep their jobs, and integrity and moral fiber really play an almost invisible role in politics. Money is the moving force in politics, and money doesn't find itself into one's coffers through integrity and morality. Bush and Kerry make the same promises to funds providers. No difference. snip Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. You could also field such a list on the right side of the aisle. My comment to Jon's question was that Hillary was referring to taking away our tax cuts, which the dems purport were only for the very rich. Of course John Kerry and his wife should have benefited about as much as anyone, considering they are probably among the top 500 richest folks in the world, if the dems are correct in their accusations. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message I'm sorry you lost your job, but your facts are twisted around. Anyone who takes a dispassionate look at the economy would see that Clinton did everything he could for the economy, while Bush did nothing. Clinton supported and signed NAFTA: job losses to Canada and Mexico. The UAW lost over half a million potential and/or real jobs, for example. Most 20th Century presidents have supported most favored nation trade status with China. Where do most of the low-tech goods we buy come from? One guess. Bush inherited the economic slide that was well into the down curve during Clinton's last year in office. Bush also inherited 9/11, which did more to tank the economy than any other factor in the past four years. Bush gave tax cuts, which are the right thing to do, not to mention at least party responsible for the economic upturn. Get your facts straight, Jon. You're spouting liberal diatribe, not facts. Clinton lied about a blow job. Bush lied about WMDs You cannot provide one scintilla of evidence that he lied about WMDs. He was wrong, yes. He was probably misinformed, yes. He probably told his intel providers that he wanted a reason for attacking Iraq, yes. But he lied? Show me the evidence, not just your left-wing dogmatic opinion. and a war that has brought this country nothing but heartache and discrace. This may be true. The final chapter isn't written yet, but my guess is that you're assessment will be correct. Clinton never lied about his lack of service. Bush didn't even bother to show up for his physical. Clinton may be a sex addict, but Bush is addicted to alcohol. So, a recovered alcoholic is not worthy of anything? Good on him that he hasn't had a drink in a long time. I hope he stays sober throughout the rest of his term, although he acts like he's drunk most of the time. He's inarticulate and low brow. He is most certainly inarticulate. Low brow? Hmmm. I'm unaware of anyone with his balance sheet that would be considered "low brow." He picked a liar and a cheat for his VP, Agreed. I strongly dislike Cheney. W should have dumped him this go-round. as well as for most of his cabinet. He picked a guy for attorney general who lost an election to a dead guy and who annointed himself with oil. Again agreed. John Ashcroft is a megalomaniac. He doesn't serve the people, rather himself and his boss. Bart compared Clinton with Bush and proposed that W was more moral and given to greater integrity than WJC. I think they both lack those qualities, but in different areas. They are, after all else, politicians. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... "Bart Senior" wrote in message t... The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. This has to be the silliest thing you, or anyone else, has ever said in this forum. Really? Unaccountable corporate greed and malfeasance play no role in their perpetuation? On what planet do you reside? Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"DSK" wrote in message It is however a very common Republican smear tactic. Sort of like the way Maxprop is convinced that I must be a libby-rull because I disagree with his caveman fascism. LOL. I am convinced you are a liberal because you are. Simple, concise, and to the point. Denial, OTOH, is your bailiwick. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"felton" wrote in message My thinking exactly. I am much more comfortable with the White House and the Congress not being controlled by the same party...either party. Amen. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Vito" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Are you making 10 million a year? If not, then that hasn't been true since the jesus freaks took over the GOP. Reagan spent more money than any democrat before him and The Village Idiot is spending far more than Hillary's front man did. Difference is democrats taxed people making over a $million a year under the Clintoons but Republicans barrow it, leaving our kids and grandkids to pay for our not-so-good times- plus interest. I have no idea what your point is, Vito, but my point was that Hillary said she would take some things away from us, and she meant the tax cuts. I pay less tax now under the current law than I did prior to the cuts. Simple, actually. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"felton" wrote in message Ultimately every dollar that government spends has to be paid for somehow, by someone sometime. Not really--those dollars just add to the runaway federal debt. But your point is valid: if tax cuts are given, spending should also be cut. A simple premise, really, but seemingly forgotten by everyone in Washington, including democrats. If you think those tax cuts created "free money" you are mistaken. When John McCain says that the current Republican Congress spends money in a way that puts drunken sailors to shame, that should tell you something about the "fiscally responsible" party. Besides, unless you are very well off, most of the Bush tax cuts didn't help you, anyway. They helped me, and I don't consider myself among the ultra-rich, as the dems purport were the only beneficiaries. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Clinton supported NAFTA, as well as most did most economists.
It's been good for the US. You now claim to be anti-free trade, except when it suits you of course? What's the problem with China? I don't get the connection between China and Clinton-bashing. Bush inherited an economy that didn't need a tax cut, that didn't needed to be pushed into a recession. Thanks Bush. The US lost millions of jobs because of him. Thanks for nothing. I don't see him reversing NAFTA if that's what the problem was. Max, get your facts straight before slam me for telling the truth. Bush lied about Iraq, about WMDs, and pretty much abdicated the search for Usama. Instead of putting in 100,000 troops in Afganistan, he put in 10K. He sent the 100K to Iraq, a country that had no WMDs and was contained. Oh, I forgot. Clinton lied about a blow job, and the ensuing right-wing fueled witchhunt cost us $70 million. Too bad because I'm sure Henry Hyde could have paid a hooker $70 or less and got the same thing. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message I'm sorry you lost your job, but your facts are twisted around. Anyone who takes a dispassionate look at the economy would see that Clinton did everything he could for the economy, while Bush did nothing. Clinton supported and signed NAFTA: job losses to Canada and Mexico. The UAW lost over half a million potential and/or real jobs, for example. Most 20th Century presidents have supported most favored nation trade status with China. Where do most of the low-tech goods we buy come from? One guess. Bush inherited the economic slide that was well into the down curve during Clinton's last year in office. Bush also inherited 9/11, which did more to tank the economy than any other factor in the past four years. Bush gave tax cuts, which are the right thing to do, not to mention at least party responsible for the economic upturn. Get your facts straight, Jon. You're spouting liberal diatribe, not facts. Clinton lied about a blow job. Bush lied about WMDs You cannot provide one scintilla of evidence that he lied about WMDs. He was wrong, yes. He was probably misinformed, yes. He probably told his intel providers that he wanted a reason for attacking Iraq, yes. But he lied? Show me the evidence, not just your left-wing dogmatic opinion. and a war that has brought this country nothing but heartache and discrace. This may be true. The final chapter isn't written yet, but my guess is that you're assessment will be correct. Clinton never lied about his lack of service. Bush didn't even bother to show up for his physical. Clinton may be a sex addict, but Bush is addicted to alcohol. So, a recovered alcoholic is not worthy of anything? Good on him that he hasn't had a drink in a long time. I hope he stays sober throughout the rest of his term, although he acts like he's drunk most of the time. He's inarticulate and low brow. He is most certainly inarticulate. Low brow? Hmmm. I'm unaware of anyone with his balance sheet that would be considered "low brow." He picked a liar and a cheat for his VP, Agreed. I strongly dislike Cheney. W should have dumped him this go-round. as well as for most of his cabinet. He picked a guy for attorney general who lost an election to a dead guy and who annointed himself with oil. Again agreed. John Ashcroft is a megalomaniac. He doesn't serve the people, rather himself and his boss. Bart compared Clinton with Bush and proposed that W was more moral and given to greater integrity than WJC. I think they both lack those qualities, but in different areas. They are, after all else, politicians. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Whitewater????? HAahahahahahaha... Clinton lost money you idiot.
Ken Lay, a great friend of GWB made just a couple of bucks I heard. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Bart Senior" wrote in message Fine, write me a check. Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. Don't yell at me, Bart. You're preaching to the choir here. A (perhaps "the") major job loss factor is NAFTA, which was supported by and signed into law by WJClinton. And yes, Whitewater paved the way for unrepentant corporate greed. Odd how the current crop of know-nothing liberals blame Bush for all the above. snip If you want to point the finger at any President. Clinton is the clear winner by being a cheat and greedy himself, he set the example that everyone else followed. And he pardoned those who paid him off. This seems to have been conveniently forgotten by the left. His eleventh hour pardons were legendary in terms of corporate greed, political payoffs, and criminal non-accountability. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. I might have to disagree a bit here. Bush is a politician first, foremost. Politicians want to keep their jobs, and integrity and moral fiber really play an almost invisible role in politics. Money is the moving force in politics, and money doesn't find itself into one's coffers through integrity and morality. Bush and Kerry make the same promises to funds providers. No difference. snip Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. You could also field such a list on the right side of the aisle. My comment to Jon's question was that Hillary was referring to taking away our tax cuts, which the dems purport were only for the very rich. Of course John Kerry and his wife should have benefited about as much as anyone, considering they are probably among the top 500 richest folks in the world, if the dems are correct in their accusations. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Simply stupid. So you pay less. Good for you. Except... you obviously
don't give a **** about anyone else. Bush has been bad for the US in many, many ways. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Vito" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Are you making 10 million a year? If not, then that hasn't been true since the jesus freaks took over the GOP. Reagan spent more money than any democrat before him and The Village Idiot is spending far more than Hillary's front man did. Difference is democrats taxed people making over a $million a year under the Clintoons but Republicans barrow it, leaving our kids and grandkids to pay for our not-so-good times- plus interest. I have no idea what your point is, Vito, but my point was that Hillary said she would take some things away from us, and she meant the tax cuts. I pay less tax now under the current law than I did prior to the cuts. Simple, actually. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Good for you. In that case, you should be voting for Kerry.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "felton" wrote in message My thinking exactly. I am much more comfortable with the White House and the Congress not being controlled by the same party...either party. Amen. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
It's true. What about all the pardons?
Bank fraud, financial crimes, and major drug dealing make up the bulk of the list. Al Capone would have made the list if he was alive. Pay off President Clinton and you get a "get out of jail free card." It is the worst sort of corruption. http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/...linton.pardon/ List of criminals http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pardonchartlst.htm Maxprop wrote "Jeff Morris" wrote "Bart Senior" wrote The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. This has to be the silliest thing you, or anyone else, has ever said in this forum. Really? Unaccountable corporate greed and malfeasance play no role in their perpetuation? On what planet do you reside? Max |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com