![]() |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... "Bart Senior" wrote in message t... The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. This has to be the silliest thing you, or anyone else, has ever said in this forum. Really? Unaccountable corporate greed and malfeasance play no role in their perpetuation? On what planet do you reside? Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"DSK" wrote in message It is however a very common Republican smear tactic. Sort of like the way Maxprop is convinced that I must be a libby-rull because I disagree with his caveman fascism. LOL. I am convinced you are a liberal because you are. Simple, concise, and to the point. Denial, OTOH, is your bailiwick. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"felton" wrote in message My thinking exactly. I am much more comfortable with the White House and the Congress not being controlled by the same party...either party. Amen. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"Vito" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Are you making 10 million a year? If not, then that hasn't been true since the jesus freaks took over the GOP. Reagan spent more money than any democrat before him and The Village Idiot is spending far more than Hillary's front man did. Difference is democrats taxed people making over a $million a year under the Clintoons but Republicans barrow it, leaving our kids and grandkids to pay for our not-so-good times- plus interest. I have no idea what your point is, Vito, but my point was that Hillary said she would take some things away from us, and she meant the tax cuts. I pay less tax now under the current law than I did prior to the cuts. Simple, actually. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
"felton" wrote in message Ultimately every dollar that government spends has to be paid for somehow, by someone sometime. Not really--those dollars just add to the runaway federal debt. But your point is valid: if tax cuts are given, spending should also be cut. A simple premise, really, but seemingly forgotten by everyone in Washington, including democrats. If you think those tax cuts created "free money" you are mistaken. When John McCain says that the current Republican Congress spends money in a way that puts drunken sailors to shame, that should tell you something about the "fiscally responsible" party. Besides, unless you are very well off, most of the Bush tax cuts didn't help you, anyway. They helped me, and I don't consider myself among the ultra-rich, as the dems purport were the only beneficiaries. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Clinton supported NAFTA, as well as most did most economists.
It's been good for the US. You now claim to be anti-free trade, except when it suits you of course? What's the problem with China? I don't get the connection between China and Clinton-bashing. Bush inherited an economy that didn't need a tax cut, that didn't needed to be pushed into a recession. Thanks Bush. The US lost millions of jobs because of him. Thanks for nothing. I don't see him reversing NAFTA if that's what the problem was. Max, get your facts straight before slam me for telling the truth. Bush lied about Iraq, about WMDs, and pretty much abdicated the search for Usama. Instead of putting in 100,000 troops in Afganistan, he put in 10K. He sent the 100K to Iraq, a country that had no WMDs and was contained. Oh, I forgot. Clinton lied about a blow job, and the ensuing right-wing fueled witchhunt cost us $70 million. Too bad because I'm sure Henry Hyde could have paid a hooker $70 or less and got the same thing. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message I'm sorry you lost your job, but your facts are twisted around. Anyone who takes a dispassionate look at the economy would see that Clinton did everything he could for the economy, while Bush did nothing. Clinton supported and signed NAFTA: job losses to Canada and Mexico. The UAW lost over half a million potential and/or real jobs, for example. Most 20th Century presidents have supported most favored nation trade status with China. Where do most of the low-tech goods we buy come from? One guess. Bush inherited the economic slide that was well into the down curve during Clinton's last year in office. Bush also inherited 9/11, which did more to tank the economy than any other factor in the past four years. Bush gave tax cuts, which are the right thing to do, not to mention at least party responsible for the economic upturn. Get your facts straight, Jon. You're spouting liberal diatribe, not facts. Clinton lied about a blow job. Bush lied about WMDs You cannot provide one scintilla of evidence that he lied about WMDs. He was wrong, yes. He was probably misinformed, yes. He probably told his intel providers that he wanted a reason for attacking Iraq, yes. But he lied? Show me the evidence, not just your left-wing dogmatic opinion. and a war that has brought this country nothing but heartache and discrace. This may be true. The final chapter isn't written yet, but my guess is that you're assessment will be correct. Clinton never lied about his lack of service. Bush didn't even bother to show up for his physical. Clinton may be a sex addict, but Bush is addicted to alcohol. So, a recovered alcoholic is not worthy of anything? Good on him that he hasn't had a drink in a long time. I hope he stays sober throughout the rest of his term, although he acts like he's drunk most of the time. He's inarticulate and low brow. He is most certainly inarticulate. Low brow? Hmmm. I'm unaware of anyone with his balance sheet that would be considered "low brow." He picked a liar and a cheat for his VP, Agreed. I strongly dislike Cheney. W should have dumped him this go-round. as well as for most of his cabinet. He picked a guy for attorney general who lost an election to a dead guy and who annointed himself with oil. Again agreed. John Ashcroft is a megalomaniac. He doesn't serve the people, rather himself and his boss. Bart compared Clinton with Bush and proposed that W was more moral and given to greater integrity than WJC. I think they both lack those qualities, but in different areas. They are, after all else, politicians. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Whitewater????? HAahahahahahaha... Clinton lost money you idiot.
Ken Lay, a great friend of GWB made just a couple of bucks I heard. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Bart Senior" wrote in message Fine, write me a check. Clinton took away hundreds of thousand of jobs including mine. Don't blame Bush when you don't have a clue what you are talking about. The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. Don't yell at me, Bart. You're preaching to the choir here. A (perhaps "the") major job loss factor is NAFTA, which was supported by and signed into law by WJClinton. And yes, Whitewater paved the way for unrepentant corporate greed. Odd how the current crop of know-nothing liberals blame Bush for all the above. snip If you want to point the finger at any President. Clinton is the clear winner by being a cheat and greedy himself, he set the example that everyone else followed. And he pardoned those who paid him off. This seems to have been conveniently forgotten by the left. His eleventh hour pardons were legendary in terms of corporate greed, political payoffs, and criminal non-accountability. Shame on you for blaming Bush, who has integrity and morals, things unknown in the Democratic {sell-out} Party. I might have to disagree a bit here. Bush is a politician first, foremost. Politicians want to keep their jobs, and integrity and moral fiber really play an almost invisible role in politics. Money is the moving force in politics, and money doesn't find itself into one's coffers through integrity and morality. Bush and Kerry make the same promises to funds providers. No difference. snip Let's vote for the greediest in the Democratic Party. The nominations are; Hilllary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Jesse Jackson, and John Kerry. You could also field such a list on the right side of the aisle. My comment to Jon's question was that Hillary was referring to taking away our tax cuts, which the dems purport were only for the very rich. Of course John Kerry and his wife should have benefited about as much as anyone, considering they are probably among the top 500 richest folks in the world, if the dems are correct in their accusations. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Simply stupid. So you pay less. Good for you. Except... you obviously
don't give a **** about anyone else. Bush has been bad for the US in many, many ways. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Vito" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote During a Democrat fundraiser in San Francisco Monday, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the audience. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Like illegal drugs? Like WMDs? Like assault rifles? Pretty easy to take things out of context isn't it.... Like money. More and more of our money. Are you making 10 million a year? If not, then that hasn't been true since the jesus freaks took over the GOP. Reagan spent more money than any democrat before him and The Village Idiot is spending far more than Hillary's front man did. Difference is democrats taxed people making over a $million a year under the Clintoons but Republicans barrow it, leaving our kids and grandkids to pay for our not-so-good times- plus interest. I have no idea what your point is, Vito, but my point was that Hillary said she would take some things away from us, and she meant the tax cuts. I pay less tax now under the current law than I did prior to the cuts. Simple, actually. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
Good for you. In that case, you should be voting for Kerry.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "felton" wrote in message My thinking exactly. I am much more comfortable with the White House and the Congress not being controlled by the same party...either party. Amen. Max |
Who is John Kerry? and why he is a loser...
It's true. What about all the pardons?
Bank fraud, financial crimes, and major drug dealing make up the bulk of the list. Al Capone would have made the list if he was alive. Pay off President Clinton and you get a "get out of jail free card." It is the worst sort of corruption. http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/...linton.pardon/ List of criminals http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pardonchartlst.htm Maxprop wrote "Jeff Morris" wrote "Bart Senior" wrote The Clinton's cheating with White Water gave the green light for corporate greed to go crazy. This has to be the silliest thing you, or anyone else, has ever said in this forum. Really? Unaccountable corporate greed and malfeasance play no role in their perpetuation? On what planet do you reside? Max |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com