I looked up the base PHRF ratings for New England.

http://www.phrfne.org/baseh.htm

And I was pleased to see this!

ERICSON 46 72

Similar to this!

SWAN 47 72

Bart Senior wrote:
I looked up the base PHRF ratings for New England.

http://www.phrfne.org/baseh.htm

And I was pleased to see this!

ERICSON 46 72

Similar to this!

SWAN 47 72

Or the Express 37, or the J-35, or the Schock 35, or the Frers 38, or
the J-109, or the Lacoste 42, or the Soverel 39, or the Tartan 46...

You're in pretty good company. OTOH the Corel 45 rates somewhere in the
minusses, and that's a very roomy boat...

Fresh Breezes- Doug King

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:21:03 GMT, "Bart Senior"
wrote this crap:

I looked up the base PHRF ratings for New England.

http://www.phrfne.org/baseh.htm


CAL 20 282


Heh Heh Heh.

With a rating like that, it would take two hours just to leave the
marina.






Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

It would still be faster than your hunter crapola, and I'd actually
make it back.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 15:21:03 GMT, "Bart Senior"
wrote this crap:

I looked up the base PHRF ratings for New England.

http://www.phrfne.org/baseh.htm


CAL 20 282


Heh Heh Heh.

With a rating like that, it would take two hours just to leave the
marina.






Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:25:44 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

It would still be faster than your hunter crapola, and I'd actually
make it back.

Heh Heh Heh. How can you possibly call anybody's boat, "crapola"?
You bought your gay POS at a garbage sale, then had it repainted in
rainbow.




Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Heh Heh Heh. How can you possibly call anybody's boat, "crapola"?
You bought your gay POS at a garbage sale, then had it repainted in
rainbow.


Horvath, in all seriousness, the Hunter marque is among the worst and garners
far less respect than Jonathan's Cal, which is certainly considered "classic
plastic. In the last 3 years Hunter has greatly improved quality control
matching Catalina and exceeding Beneteau, but earlier Hunter's are frowned on
by sailors and surveyors alike. If your Hunter is less than 3 years old, you
may have a reasonable low end boat. If not, you have my sympathy, but then you
should have done your homework before buying.

RB

On 16 Jun 2004 10:32:00 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

Heh Heh Heh. How can you possibly call anybody's boat, "crapola"?
You bought your gay POS at a garbage sale, then had it repainted in
rainbow.


Horvath, in all seriousness, the Hunter marque is among the worst and garners
far less respect than Jonathan's Cal, which is certainly considered "classic
plastic. In the last 3 years Hunter has greatly improved quality control
matching Catalina and exceeding Beneteau, but earlier Hunter's are frowned on
by sailors and surveyors alike. If your Hunter is less than 3 years old, you
may have a reasonable low end boat. If not, you have my sympathy, but then you
should have done your homework before buying.


You know jack **** about boats. My 1980 25' Hunter was a classic.
And my new Hunter 336 is even better. But what do you know? You
don't even know what a whisker pole is.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Horass is right. His hunter is a classic piece of junk.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On 16 Jun 2004 10:32:00 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

Heh Heh Heh. How can you possibly call anybody's boat, "crapola"?
You bought your gay POS at a garbage sale, then had it repainted in
rainbow.


Horvath, in all seriousness, the Hunter marque is among the worst and
garners
far less respect than Jonathan's Cal, which is certainly considered
"classic
plastic. In the last 3 years Hunter has greatly improved quality control
matching Catalina and exceeding Beneteau, but earlier Hunter's are
frowned on
by sailors and surveyors alike. If your Hunter is less than 3 years old,
you
may have a reasonable low end boat. If not, you have my sympathy, but
then you
should have done your homework before buying.


You know jack **** about boats. My 1980 25' Hunter was a classic.
And my new Hunter 336 is even better. But what do you know? You
don't even know what a whisker pole is.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

I've been on lots of Hunters. The very old ones have a bad reputation;
the newer ones are nice boats. I paritcularlly like the 376, except
sleeping the curved settee is uncomfortable.

Horvath wrote .
On 16 Jun 2004 10:32:00 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote this
crap:

Heh Heh Heh. How can you possibly call anybody's boat, "crapola"?
You bought your gay POS at a garbage sale, then had it repainted in
rainbow.


Horvath, in all seriousness, the Hunter marque is among the worst and
garners
far less respect than Jonathan's Cal, which is certainly considered
"classic
plastic. In the last 3 years Hunter has greatly improved quality control
matching Catalina and exceeding Beneteau, but earlier Hunter's are
frowned on
by sailors and surveyors alike. If your Hunter is less than 3 years old,
you
may have a reasonable low end boat. If not, you have my sympathy, but
then you
should have done your homework before buying.


You know jack **** about boats. My 1980 25' Hunter was a classic.
And my new Hunter 336 is even better. But what do you know? You
don't even know what a whisker pole is.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

So what you're saying is that not only are you stuipd but you're blind.

You're the gay boy. You keep mentioning it at every opportunity.

FYI, it's easy to call your boat crapola because of the "owner."

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:25:44 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

It would still be faster than your hunter crapola, and I'd actually
make it back.

Heh Heh Heh. How can you possibly call anybody's boat, "crapola"?
You bought your gay POS at a garbage sale, then had it repainted in
rainbow.




Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!