"Bobsprit" wrote in message

Sorry you're so willing to put up with another incompetent boob in the
job.



Well at least you've nailed Bush!!! You're right, we need to get him out
ASAP!

Insipid, boring response, Bubbles. Really, you must do better if you want
to hold anyone's interest.

Max

OzOne wrote in message

On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 04:43:52 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:


You're beginning to sound like Bubbles. How about John Kerry for the
next
PM of Oz? Does everyone down under set his sights so low?


"Anything'
that will try and unravel the damage that only one term under GWB and
his overly agressive war machine have done.

Are you deluded by Kerry's anti-Iraq war rhetoric? Do you honestly believe
that he, as Commander-in-Chief, will yank our troops? As long as we have
soldiers in a conflict zone and he is CIC, he's required by law to support
them and their mission. It won't take long to realize that the song was
right: "enter the new boss, same as the old boss."


I don't think particularly highly of Kerry however it's evident that
the man isn't the politics as evident by the US citizens propensity
for electing movie stars and personalities to positions of high
office.

Kerry the man will bring in a new order, one that is determined to
bring peace rather than continually provoke those with whose policies
they don't agree.

Perhaps, but I'd really like someone with a conscience, a sense of direction
(Kerry has shown nothing of this), and a plan. Kerry was quoted recently as
having told Senator Diane Feinstein that "the only notch I still don't have
on the old gunbelt is (the presidency)." Sounds like base-level
politics-as-usual to moi.

Max

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
Does everyone down under set his sights so low?


Nope, US republicans only.

Boring, Bubbles

Max

OzOne wrote in message

On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 04:45:15 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:

While true--and I generally subscribe to that philosophy--I'd rather find
someone with substance and integrity. Of course I'm dreaming where
politics
are concerned.

So you don't regard a man who can stand up and admit he got it wrong
as having substance and integrity?

Depends. If he admits he was in error because he WAS in error, perhaps.
But if he changes his tune only to take the opposition to the incumbent,
then he's little more than a political hack. Joe Lieberman did exactly this
in the 2000 election. He had always been pro-life, but to be on the ticket
with Al Gore he had to flip-flop to pro-choice. Now he's back to pro-life
again. Political hack.


BTW has GWB acknowledged yet that there never were WMD in Iraq at the
time he was planning his invasion (after he was elected that is)

Does this assume that he wasn't planning to invade Iraq prior to the
election? I think it was high on his list if elected.

or
that he and his Govt were wrong in assuming that Iraq posed an threat
to the US, or has he just changed the story to one of saving the
people of Iraq?

Not that I've heard. I bought his pre-war rhetoric, but I also said I'd
curtail my support of him if he were wrong about WMDs. He was wrong, I feel
cheated, and he won't get my vote this November.

Max

"DSK" wrote in message

Maxprop wrote:
Actually I wasn't. Reagan's physicians all concluded that he was
suffering
an unspecified age-related dementia while still in the White House. The
actual term, Alzheimer's, didn't come until later, but he and his
doctors
knew he was ill before the term was applied to his case.

It's possible that Reagan's doctors noticed that he had problems in this
area while he was still in office, after all he perceived reality in a
different way all his life. But he wasn't diagnosed with Alzheimer's
until six years after he was out of office. That's a long gap for a
diagnosis.

You may recall, Doug, that Alzheimer's wasn't exactly a household term
during Reagan's terms. The preponderant body of knowledge concerning it was
amassed during the Nineties, including diagnostic tools and techniques.
Further it's not uncommon for such diagnoses to be made years or even a
decade following the onset of Sx.

Max

Beside you?

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote ...
He wasn't better than Clinton, but he was a decent pres. I didn't
like a lot of his social policies,

as did most other gays.

"Maxprop" wrote

Boring, Bubbles


that's redundant.

On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:43:48 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Beside you?


Are you finally coming out of the closet?



"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote ...
He wasn't better than Clinton, but he was a decent pres. I didn't
like a lot of his social policies,

as did most other gays.



Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Hahahaha... no thanks... I prefer real women.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 06:00:27 -0400, Horvath
scribbled thusly:

On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:43:48 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Beside you?


Are you finally coming out of the closet?

Nah, he just wants to feel your tits.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.