| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Martin Baxter" wrote in message ... Donal wrote: My (unpalatable) views are based on current scientific thinking. Just which peer reviewed "Scientific" journal should I peruse to read articles which would suggest that "current scientific thinking" is no longer in accordance with the Theory of Evolution"? Sorry about taking so long to reply. I have a huge amount of unread posts to catch up on! I didn't mean to imply that scientists agreed with me. I was trying to say that my arguements are based on scientific thinking. IOW, I am not relying on religious beliefs to back up my contentions. Scientists agree that Man could not have evolved in the available time unless there were periods of *intense* development. They try to suggest that man underwent extreme development during periods of intense radiation. This theory is completely discredited by practical observations. Regards Donal -- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Definition of a troll | General | |||
| SSB Antenna theory | Electronics | |||
| sponsons really work! (BS) | General | |||
| Definition of Express | ASA | |||